July 2016 - Gnso-newgtld-wg

Proposed Agenda
by Steve Chan Aug. 1, 2016

Aug. 1, 2016

Dear WG Members, Below, please find the proposed agenda for the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures WG meeting scheduled for Monday, 1 August 2016 at 1300 UTC. 1. Welcome/Review Agenda 2. SOIs 3. Work Track (Sub Team) discussion and planning 4. Competition, Consumer Trust & Consumer Choice Review Team (CCT-RT) – Possible input to their draft applicant survey (if possible, please review the attached document before the WG meeting) with CCT-RT Chair Jonathan Zuck 5. CC1/Overarching Issues Preliminary Findings (https://docs.google.com/document/d/16Sd6mpO5MqHl7BHOl9HBENDgUvcqQ04QumbVNfV…) 6. Accreditation Programs cont. 7. AOB Best, Steven Chan  Sr. Policy Manager   ICANN 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536  steve.chan(a)icann.org direct: +1.310.301.3886  mobile: +1.310.339.4410 tel: +1.310.301.5800 fax: +1.310.823.8649 Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages. Follow @GNSO on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ICANN_GNSO Follow the GNSO on Facebook: https://twitter.com/ICANN_GNSO http://gnso.icann.org/en/

5 4

[gnso-newgtld-wg] - Letter from Thomas Schneider (Chair, GAC) in response to CC1
by Steve Chan July 31, 2016

July 31, 2016

Dear WG Members, Attached, please find the response to CC1 from Thomas Schneider, Chair of the Governmental Advisory Committee (GAC). Staff has posted this letter on the Wiki, where all future responses from ICANN Supporting Organizations and Advisory Committees, as well as GNSO Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies, will be posted: https://community.icann.org/x/3B6OAw Best, Steve Steven Chan  Sr. Policy Manager   ICANN 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536  steve.chan(a)icann.org direct: +1.310.301.3886  mobile: +1.310.339.4410 tel: +1.310.301.5800 fax: +1.310.823.8649 Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages. Follow @GNSO on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ICANN_GNSO Follow the GNSO on Facebook: https://twitter.com/ICANN_GNSO http://gnso.icann.org/en/

2 1

REMINDER: Call for Volunteers – Subsequent Procedures PDP WG Work Track Sub Teams
by Julie Hedlund July 26, 2016

July 26, 2016

Dear PDP WG members, This is a reminder for the Call for Volunteers for participants and observers in the four PDP WG Work Track Sub Teams (with links to descriptions in the wikis): Track 1 – Overall Process/Support/Outreach Issues Track 2 – Legal/Regulatory Issues Track 3 – String Contention, Objections & Disputes Track 4 – IDNs/Technical & Operations There are two ways to volunteer: · As an active participant who wishes to engage in the day-to-day discussions of the particular topic. Each active participant is expected to spend at least 1-3 hours per week on Sub -Team work and will have posting rights to the mailing list. · As an observer who wishes to follow the topic discussion but not actively participate at the Sub-Team level. Observers are not expected to spend time on Sub-Team work and will not have posting rights to the mailing list. If you are interested in being a participant or observer in any of the Work Tracks please enter your name and email in the Google Drive Document at: https://docs.google.com/document/d/146fl7TfrHAkA5Cw0VfoTdGcmeZtimnMBDpXQj-2…. If for whatever reason, you are unable to access the Google Drive Document, please contact staff and we will be happy to add your name on your behalf. Using the blue and orange boxes in the Google Doc, please enter your name and email address into the Work Tracks you have an interest in volunteering in. Entering your name in the blue box means you’d like to volunteer as an active participant. Entering your name in the orange box means you’d like to volunteer as an observer. Highlight your name in yellow if you are interested in serving as the Sub Team's rapporteur(s). It would be very helpful if you could provide your information by Friday, 22 July, so that we can provide an update on the Work Track Sub Team participants at the meeting on 25 July. Please do not hesitate to let us know if you have questions. Kind regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director

4 7

Actions/Discussion Notes: New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG 18 July 2016
by Julie Hedlund July 22, 2016

July 22, 2016

Dear PDP WG members, Please see below the action items and discussion notes captured by staff from the meeting on 18 July. These high-level notes are designed to help PDP WG members navigate through the content of the call and are not meant as a substitute for the transcript. The MP3, transcript, and chat are provided separately and are posted on the wiki at: https://community.icann.org/display/NGSPP/1.+WG+Meetings. Kind regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director Actions/Discussion Notes: New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG Meeting, 18 July 2016 1. Co-Chairs Notes: · Stephen Coates is stepping down as Co-Chair. · Agreement that there is no need for a third Co-Chair at this time, in addition to Jeff Neuman and Avri Doria as Co-Chairs. 2. Sub-Team Discussion (sign-up sheet https://docs.google.com/document/d/146fl7TfrHAkA5Cw0VfoTdGcmeZtimnMBDpXQj-2…) Notes: A reminder was sent 18 July. Please sign up by 22 July. Volunteers so far: Track 1 -- Overall Process/Support/Outreach Issues -- Participants: 24; Observers: 11 Track 2 -- Legal/Regulatory Issues -- Participants: 20; Observers: 10 Track 3 -- String Contention, Objections & Disputes -- Participants: 17; Observers: 11 Track 4 -- IDNs/Technical & Operations -- Participants: 13; Observers: 10 · Staff have updated the track descriptions based on the conversations from ICANN 56. · Leadership talked about a possible plan for how the Work Track Sub Teams would meet. Suggested rotation: week 1--Tracks 1 and 2, week 2--Tracks 3 and 4 + Full Committee. · Work on creating the community comments requests based on the information we need. Could be done like CC1 or in some other way. 2. CC1 reminder/Discuss draft conclusions document Action Items: 1. Urge your groups to complete the CC1 responses (extension until 01 August). 2. Review the draft conclusions document at: https://docs.google.com/document/d/16Sd6mpO5MqHl7BHOl9HBENDgUvcqQ04QumbVNfV… Notes: · Deadline: 25 July. Received so far: Re: Statements -- 7 received; Re: CC1 -- None received. · Noted the complexity of answering the questions and that some groups may need more time. Suggest allowing until the next meeting on 01 August (25 July is canceled). · Draft conclusions document is a staff summation on the overarching subjects. May change as CC1 responses are received. 3. Resolution on Policy Items/Implementation Plan(s) Notes: · Example: Accreditation of back-end providers (Work Track 1) -- included from the Discussion Group, but analysis of policy versus implementation has not been done. · Consider establishing an implementation group to develop criteria, taking into consideration policy issues. · Develop pros and cons for the program. · Would like to see discussion on topics like this on the list. Send further comments to the list.

9 11

Please participate - doodle poll on possible F2F session at ICANN57
by Steve Chan July 21, 2016

July 21, 2016

Dear WG Members, This email is to inform you the GNSO Council is currently considering if and when PDP Face-to-Face (F2F) Working Group meetings can take place during ICANN57. The current thinking is that such a F2F meeting could take place on day 1 of ICANN57 (Thursday 3 November) in the form of a full day or half-day session. In order to assess the availability of WG members to participate in such a meeting either in person or remotely, please complete the following poll: http://doodle.com/poll/cdr7uwun3byfu288. This information will be used by the GNSO Council to make a determination if such a meeting will be scheduled and for which PDP WG(s). Of course, we know that at this stage it may be difficult for you to confirm your attendance, but hopefully by capturing the intent we’ll get a rough idea of the availability of WG members to potentially participate in such a meeting. Best, Steve Steven Chan  Sr. Policy Manager   ICANN 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536  steve.chan(a)icann.org direct: +1.310.301.3886  mobile: +1.310.339.4410 tel: +1.310.301.5800 fax: +1.310.823.8649 Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages. Follow @GNSO on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ICANN_GNSO Follow the GNSO on Facebook: https://twitter.com/ICANN_GNSO http://gnso.icann.org/en/

5 8

Attendance, Mp3 & AC Chat from New gTLD Subsequent Procedures WG Call 18 July 2016 22:00 UTC
by Michelle DeSmyter July 19, 2016

July 19, 2016

Dear All, Please find the attendance of the call attached to this email and the MP3 recording below for the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Working Group call held on Monday, 18 July 2016 at 22:00 UTC. Attendance of the calls is also posted on the agenda wiki page: https://community.icann.org/x/NAKbAw MP3: http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-new-gtld-subsequent-18jul16-en.mp3 <http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-new-gtld-subsequent-18jul16-en.mp3> <http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-new-gtld-subsequent-16may16-en.mp3> <http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-new-gtld-subsequent-09may16-en.mp3http://a…> The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page: http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar<http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar#nov> ** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list ** Mailing list archives: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg/ Wiki page: https://community.icann.org/x/NAKbAw Thank you. Kind regards, Michelle DeSmyter ------------------------------- Adobe Connect chat transcript for Monday, 18 July 2016 Michelle DeSmyter:Dear All, Welcome to the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures WG held on Monday, 18 July 2016 at 22:00 UTC Rubens Kuhl:Good <time of day> everyone! Greg Shatan:x = evening Guillemaut Frederic SafeBrands:Good evening Carlos:Hello Freida Tallon (.Sky):Good Evening All Paul McGrady:Howdee! Robin Gross:Good afternoon from foggy San Francisco! Vanda Scartezini:hi all Carlos:Thanks jeff, ther eis a LACRALO call in one hour and will have to move Vanda Scartezini:me too already informed and apologized Carlos:@Vanda +1 :) Paul McGrady:+1 Jeff. Agree with that approach. Rubens Kuhl:Fine by me. Vanda Scartezini:ok Justine Chew:Yes, agreed Martin Sutton:me too Samantha Demetriou:+1 Klaus Stoll:Fine Robin Gross:I agree also. Paul McGrady:Hi Cheryl! Phil Buckingham:good evening Steve Coates:Sorry for running late. Rubens Kuhl:Guilty of signing-up for all 4. Carlos:Zika is well represented then.... Sara Bockey:I'm I the only one that has lost audio? Paul McGrady:@Jeff, it will be important that the meeting times don't overlap Rubens Kuhl:Sara, audio is OK here. Carlos:uxio ok Carlos:audio ok Robin Gross:a - ok Christa Taylor:yes we can hear you Vanda Scartezini:i have sent to Julie today my preference Rodolfo Mesa:Audio Ok Steve Chan:https://community.icann.org/x/FT2AAw Steve Chan:https://community.icann.org/x/7AObAw Carlton Samuels:Howdy all Carlton Samuels:Apologies for late joinging Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):Finally i the AC room... No more 'judt verbl' interventions from me now Jeff ;-) Steve Chan:Example for Work Track Scheduling: Week 1 - WT 1, 2; Week 2 - WT 3, 4, Full Group; Week 3 - WT 1, 2; Week 4 - WT 3, 4, Full Group Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):makes sence Steve Susan Payne:My mike isn't working. I will type Susan Payne:but carry on Richard Padilla:Hi all Carlton Samuels:For the record, Carlton Samuels is volunteering for Track 1 - Overall Process/Support/Outreach Issues Steve Coates:As an FYI, I have stepped down from the BC due to my employment change that will go into effect next month. Susan Payne:It was justb a point on the new item for WT3 - PICDRP/RRDRP. I think they may be more suitable to WT2. WT3 seems to be top level issues, whereas compliance and other issues at 2nd level have been allocated to WT2 Rubens Kuhl:Agree with Susan regarding PICDRP/RRDRP. Carlton Samuels:I Will Observe on Track 3. Steve Chan:FYI, responses for outreach are being tracked here: https://community.icann.org/x/2R6OAw Karen Day (SAS):Also agree with Susan re: PICDRP & RRDRP Steve Chan:And for CC1: https://community.icann.org/x/3B6OAw Cecilia Smith:I have sent a follow-up to the BC and will provide an update. Tom Dale (ACIG GAC Secretariat):The GAC is aiming to finalise its response to CC1 by the deadline next week, or close to it. Vanda Scartezini:may be one week Samantha Demetriou:The Registries could probably use an additional week Steve Chan:@Susan, Rubens, Karen - I can move to track 2 Susan Payne:Thanks Steve Robin Gross:I suspect NCSG could use the extra time. Greg Shatan:Please sir, may I have some more (time)? Greg Shatan:Thank you, sire! Tom Dale (ACIG GAC Secretariat):Having great expectations. Greg Shatan:(IPC = poor downtrodden urchins) Robin Gross:Better than "Les Miserables" Avri Doria:and waht was the answer Oliver got when he asked for more? Jeff Neuman:You know I am a sucker for musical references Jeff Neuman:Avri - the response was utter amazement that he asked for more Richard Padilla:I will like to volunteer as an observer on track 4 Tom Dale (ACIG GAC Secretariat):Of course Oliver was a literary character before he sang. Just like Alexander Hamilton was a Treasury Secretary before he was a musical. Carlos:would be nice to have the full doc as a pdf (and I´m not Dr. Liese by any way) Steve Chan:@Jeff, I tried to make that point as well :) Carlos::) Steve Coates:+1 Carlos:txs Steve Chan:@ Carlos, Steve Coates, sure thing Greg Shatan:What the Dickens, Jeff? Carlos:in the mailing list please Steve Ch. Steve Chan:@ Carlos, I will add to the WIki and share with the mailing list as well Carlos:@Steve Danke! Rubens Kuhl:I would just add that back-end accreditation allows for not only have a pre-defined set of approved back-ends, but also the possibility of choosing a back-end only at contract signing time, provide applicant agrees to only use accredited providers. Rubens Kuhl:So the reference to sets is defining an outcome yet to be chosen by the WG. Donna Austin, Neustar:so perhaps we should do that analysis Greg Shatan:"Please, sir, I want some more." The master was a fat, healthy man; but he turned very pale. He gazed in stupefied astonishment on the small rebel for some seconds, and then clung for support to the copper. The assistants were paralysed with wonder; the boys with fear. "What!" said the master at length, in a faint voice. "Please, sir," replied Oliver, "I want some more." The master aimed a blow at Oliver's head with the ladle; pinioned him in his arms; and shrieked aloud for the beadle. Donna Austin, Neustar:I feel it's implementation associated with some of the challenges associated with technical questions. Rubens Kuhl:The policy issue is whether one is required to show the technical capacity beforehand, at application time, or after. Donna Austin, Neustar:@Rubens, but there may be other possibilities to solve the problem. I don't see accreditation as the only answer. Rubens Kuhl:Donna, it doesn't need to be. Accreditation is just an option, but the same process can be used to have a greenfield operator start from zero. Heather Forrest:Picking up on @Rubens' point, would it encourage applicants (particularly in underserved areas/communities/interests) to apply if satisfying tech requirements was a separate step that came after the application submission? Donna Austin, Neustar:@Rubens, I think that's a good point, we're largely talking about greenfield operators. those that have passed necessary test and are in compliance with regsitry agreements probably don't need accreditation. Rubens Kuhl:If accreditation doesn't work, then registrars are already an issue for ICANN... Carlos:agree with heather Paul McGrady:+1 Heather. Agree that this is important for geo diversity. Carlos:sorry, Dr. H. Forrest Karen Day (SAS):As an applicant involved in a contention, it would have been preferable to pick a back end after the contention was resolved Paul McGrady:HRH Dr. H. Forrest... Martin Sutton:could simplify, reduce costs and create predictability Carlos:In which WGroup would this issues be dealt with? Carlos:@Paul :) Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):Makes sense to me Heather Christa Taylor:Good idea and it makes a lot of sense Heather Forrest:I thought I killed it Susan Payne:I like that idea - would be a strong argument for an acreditation Vanda Scartezini:to me too. in del=veloping areas mostly are under back end aalready known services.. Carlos:<Question> which WS or WG would deal with this issue? Donna Austin, Neustar:Wouldn't ICANN need assurances that the applicant has technical capability before they approve and application? Heather Forrest:Seems like it would encourage some of the types of applicants that we struggled to get in 2012 Karen Day (SAS):I think I just lost audio... Karen Day (SAS):will dial back in Steve Chan:@Carlos, it's currently in Track 1 Robin Gross:I hear Christa Taylor:works here Vanda Scartezini:no problems here Carlos:@Steve leave it there Rubens Kuhl:Looks fine in both. Which is why I'm glad tracks 1 and 4 wont' have conflicting schedules... Karen Day (SAS):im back Donna Austin, Neustar:I would hope that there is no PDT if there is an accreditation process. Greg Shatan:Now the Sprint Guy. Rubens Kuhl:ICANN does a lot of work before signing the agreement, like background checking... adding the back-end at this point would be a very small addition to the sign-up process. Donna Austin, Neustar:@Karen, in that context it makes sense. Karen Day (SAS):@Greg - true Donna Austin, Neustar:@Jeff, if this is in work track 1, wouldn't the discussion happen in that work team? Paul McGrady:@Jeff, funny that we think it is the flip now! Steve Chan:@Jeff, I was just taking a note to dig around in ICANN Justine Chew:Donna +1 Donna Austin, Neustar:@Jeff, agree on the reasons for trying to do it this way, just trying to find a way to make it efficient. Rubens Kuhl:Accreditation is an implementation that can affect already established registries. Phil Marano (Mayer Brown):Regarding backend accreditation, it looks like certain technical Application Questions shared a nexus between the envisaged Registry Services and “business components of each proposed service.” In particular, Question 23 asked applicants to “describe whether any of [the customary services] are intended to be offered in a manner unique to the TLD” and advised that “additional proposed registry services that are unique to the registry must also be described.” It may be worthwhile to explore how that nexus could / should be addressed through a backend accreditation program. Perhaps accreditation would apply only to customary services, e.g. dissemination of zone files, registration data, IDNs and DNSSEC, and not any unique or unforseen services… Just flagging the issue for consideration. Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):you men provide the Board with a pcjkage that inludes "some implementataion guidelines" Jeff?? Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):and Sorry my AC keeps dropping Vanda Scartezini:unhappily LACRALO is starting and I need to close this session and enter into LACRALO. apologize to all Greg Shatan:@CLO, it's not just men.... Rubens Kuhl:@Phil Marano: most of the services you described could be added via an RSEP process, so the what's not common ground can be added after contract signing thru RSEP without having it specified at application time. Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):OK Jeff that is clear, ecause I to am concerned abut seeming to be puttng 'cart before horse' herre and overstepping our Charter Heather Forrest:@Phil - good points! This highlights Jeff's comment much earlier that we would have to have something in place of PDT to essentially sign off on the package of standard and non-standard services Rubens Kuhl:@Phil Marano: application time is needed when it might decided who gets a string, or when the applicant wants assurance some usage model would be approved. Phil Buckingham:@ Phil - yes agreed it is a question of which questions can be standardised Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):Yes Alan +++ Avri Doria:We had thought about them and discussed them with staff. We just never wrote down what we beleived had been agreed to on implementation. Christa Taylor:Agreed on implementation vs recommendation Justine Chew:Agree with Alan's point. Carlos:Sorry Folks, have to move to a LACRALO call. Alan Greenberg:@avri, yes, we talked about some of them, and others were just omitted. Alan Greenberg:I have to leave now as well. Thanks for interesting call. Heather Forrest:Thanks Jeff, great call with very interesting discussion Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):Bye for now then... talk again soon Paul McGrady:Thanks Jeff! Thanks Avri! Christa Taylor:Enjoy your vacation!! Sara Bockey 2:thanks all Rubens Kuhl:Bye all! Phil Marano (Mayer Brown):Thanks all! Alexander Schubert:bye Tom Dale (ACIG GAC Secretariat):Thank you Christa Taylor:bye Guillemaut Frederic SafeBrands:bye Phil Buckingham:LOL Cecilia Smith:Thanks! Greg Shatan:Bye all! Richard Padilla:Bye all have a good vacation for those going on such later Freida Tallon (.Sky):Bye Bye All Susan Payne:thanks all Phil Buckingham:thanks .

1 0

- Preliminary Findings for Overarching Issues
by Steve Chan July 19, 2016

July 19, 2016

Dear WG Members, As requested on the WG call that just took place, staff is distributing a PDF version of a set of preliminary conclusions regarding the 6 Overarching Issues that have been discussed. The Google Doc and the PDF can also be found on the Wiki here: https://community.icann.org/x/VQSbAw In distributing this, I would like to stress a few points that were made on the call: · This is merely a staff summary for WG consideration and corrections or other edits are of course welcomed and encouraged. · The presence of this draft document should not be considered to diminish the impact that CC1 responses may have on deliberations or final outcomes. Best, Steve Steven Chan  Sr. Policy Manager   ICANN 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536  steve.chan(a)icann.org direct: +1.310.301.3886  mobile: +1.310.339.4410 tel: +1.310.301.5800 fax: +1.310.823.8649 Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages. Follow @GNSO on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ICANN_GNSO Follow the GNSO on Facebook: https://twitter.com/ICANN_GNSO http://gnso.icann.org/en/

1 0

- Proposed Agenda
by Steve Chan July 15, 2016

July 15, 2016

Dear WG Members, Below, please find the proposed agenda for the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures WG meeting scheduled for Monday, 18 July 2016 at 22:00 UTC. 1. Review Agenda 2. Roll Call/SOIs 3. Sub-Team Discussion (sign-up sheet https://docs.google.com/document/d/146fl7TfrHAkA5Cw0VfoTdGcmeZtimnMBDpXQj-2…) 4. CC1 reminder/Discuss draft conclusions document (https://docs.google.com/document/d/16Sd6mpO5MqHl7BHOl9HBENDgUvcqQ04QumbVNfV…) 5. AOB Those signed up as Members to this PDP WG should have received meeting information from the GNSO Secretariat. If you did not receive these participation details, please contact the GNSO Secretariat for assistance (gnso-secs(a)icann.org) Best, Steve Steven Chan  Sr. Policy Manager   ICANN 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536  steve.chan(a)icann.org direct: +1.310.301.3886  mobile: +1.310.339.4410 tel: +1.310.301.5800 fax: +1.310.823.8649 Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages. Follow @GNSO on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ICANN_GNSO Follow the GNSO on Facebook: https://twitter.com/ICANN_GNSO http://gnso.icann.org/en/

1 0

Call for Volunteers – Subsequent Procedures PDP WG Work Track Sub Teams
by Julie Hedlund July 13, 2016

July 13, 2016

Dear PDP WG members, This is a Call for Volunteers for participants and observers in the four PDP WG Work Track Sub Teams (with links to descriptions in the wikis): Track 1 – Overall Process/Support/Outreach Issues Track 2 – Legal/Regulatory Issues Track 3 – String Contention, Objections & Disputes Track 4 – IDNs/Technical & Operations There are two ways to volunteer: · As an active participant who wishes to engage in the day-to-day discussions of the particular topic. Each active participant is expected to spend at least 1-3 hours per week on Sub -Team work and will have posting rights to the mailing list. · As an observer who wishes to follow the topic discussion but not actively participate at the Sub-Team level. Observers are not expected to spend time on Sub-Team work and will not have posting rights to the mailing list. If you are interested in being a participant or observer in any of the Work Tracks please enter your name and email in the Google Drive Document at: https://docs.google.com/document/d/146fl7TfrHAkA5Cw0VfoTdGcmeZtimnMBDpXQj-2…. If for whatever reason, you are unable to access the Google Drive Document, please contact staff and we will be happy to add your name on your behalf. Using the blue and orange boxes in the Google Doc, please enter your name and email address into the Work Tracks you have an interest in volunteering in. Entering your name in the blue box means you’d like to volunteer as an active participant. Entering your name in the orange box means you’d like to volunteer as an observer. Highlight your name in yellow if you are interested in serving as the Sub Team's rapporteur(s). It would be very helpful if you could provide your information by Friday, 22 July, so that we can provide an update on the Work Track Sub Team participants at the meeting on 25 July. Please do not hesitate to let us know if you have questions. Kind regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director

2 2

Call for RSVPs: GNSO Working Group Communication Tools Classroom | 26 July 2016 at 13:00 UTC
by Nathalie Peregrine July 12, 2016

July 12, 2016

GNSO Working Group Communication Tools Classroom | July 26 2016 | 13:00 UTC Please RSVP via this form<http://goo.gl/forms/mR4HD9XNZU> by 25 July 2016. Are you a new GNSO Working Group Member? Do you have questions you never asked about Adobe Connect or other participation tools that are used to facilitate Working Group deliberations? The upcoming Communication Tools Classroom is the place to look for answers to these and any other questions you may have in relation to Working Group tools. Please join the SO/AC Support team on July 26, 2016 at 13:00 UTC for the Communication Tools Classroom. In an informal setting, new Working Group members will be familiarized with the communication tools they will be using when taking part in GNSO Working Groups. Agenda: 1. Welcome 2. Introduction to the SO/AC Support team & Policy Support Staff 3. Where to find relevant information: a. GNSO Master Calendar b. Individual Working Group Wiki pages. 4. Working Group Mailing lists: a. Difference between statuses (Observer/ Member) 5. Working Group Members a. Statements of Interests b. Email invitations c. Calendar invitations 6. Adobe Connect room 7. Questions This session will be recorded and the recordings will be made available on the GNSO Calendar<http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar>. We look forward to your participation! Please RSVP via this form<http://goo.gl/forms/mR4HD9XNZU> by 25 July 2016.

1 0