Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Proposed Agenda - New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG - Thursday, 28 May at 20:00 UTC for 90 Minutes
Dear all, The Co-Chairs will reference one additional document on today’s call, available here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CYOruGqewTsu5ejL_zoom0ol6VA1xMLX2FXW2VAy... This short document contains draft definitions of terms that are used in the draft Final Report sections, including Affirmation, Affirmation with modification, Recommendation, Implementation Guidance, and No Agreement. It also discusses use of the terms “should” and “must.” Kind regards, Emily From: Gnso-newgtld-wg <gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@icann.org> Date: Tuesday, 26 May 2020 at 20:56 To: "gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org" <gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org> Subject: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Proposed Agenda - New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG - Thursday, 28 May at 20:00 UTC for 90 Minutes Dear all, Please find below the proposed agenda for the call on Thursday, 28 May 2020 at 20:00 UTC for 90 minutes. Proposed Agenda: 1. Review Agenda/Updates to Statements of Interest 2. Discussion of Final Report Topics: a. Review "Can't Live With" comments on packages 1-3: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Hh8Wj3IwXvi91Am1k4Zoooct2zmPOmVe1pLmjQLu... [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_documen...> b. Review Category 1/Verified TLDs in 2.3.2 Registry commitments / Public Interest Commitments: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1kUlmZH8nxWTgfcRluA5FxLheMm4XhhOwkRt7om52... [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_documen...>, page 139; see also the ICANN46 Beijing Communique’ at: https://gac.icann.org/contentMigrated/icann46-beijing-communique [gac.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gac.icann.org_contentMi...> 1. AOB If you need a dial out or would like to submit an apology, please email gnso-secs@icann.org<mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org>. Kind regards, Julie
Thank you, Emily. Jeff and Cheryl, do we take from this document that all Recommendations are meant to be “MUST” and all Implementation Guidance is meant to be “SHOULD”? (If so, don’t we have some recommendations which state something the ICANN Board should do (which cannot say MUST) cause neither we nor Council has that level of authority over the Board, which is bound by its own fiduciary duties. Regarding the “No Agreement” section in the document linked below, could you please give us some examples on the call of the “very few” areas where the WG did not reach agreement? In that definition, are you getting at the issue of “agreement” or the issue of “consensus”? Thank you, Anne From: Gnso-newgtld-wg <gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of Emily Barabas Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2020 10:42 AM To: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@icann.org>; gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org Subject: Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Proposed Agenda - New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG - Thursday, 28 May at 20:00 UTC for 90 Minutes [EXTERNAL] ________________________________ Dear all, The Co-Chairs will reference one additional document on today’s call, available here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CYOruGqewTsu5ejL_zoom0ol6VA1xMLX2FXW2VAy... This short document contains draft definitions of terms that are used in the draft Final Report sections, including Affirmation, Affirmation with modification, Recommendation, Implementation Guidance, and No Agreement. It also discusses use of the terms “should” and “must.” Kind regards, Emily From: Gnso-newgtld-wg <gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces@icann.org<mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces@icann.org>> on behalf of Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@icann.org<mailto:julie.hedlund@icann.org>> Date: Tuesday, 26 May 2020 at 20:56 To: "gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org<mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org>" <gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org<mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org>> Subject: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Proposed Agenda - New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG - Thursday, 28 May at 20:00 UTC for 90 Minutes Dear all, Please find below the proposed agenda for the call on Thursday, 28 May 2020 at 20:00 UTC for 90 minutes. Proposed Agenda: 1. Review Agenda/Updates to Statements of Interest 2. Discussion of Final Report Topics: a. Review "Can't Live With" comments on packages 1-3: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Hh8Wj3IwXvi91Am1k4Zoooct2zmPOmVe1pLmjQLu... [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_documen...> b. Review Category 1/Verified TLDs in 2.3.2 Registry commitments / Public Interest Commitments: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1kUlmZH8nxWTgfcRluA5FxLheMm4XhhOwkRt7om52... [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_documen...>, page 139; see also the ICANN46 Beijing Communique’ at: https://gac.icann.org/contentMigrated/icann46-beijing-communique [gac.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gac.icann.org_contentMi...> 1. AOB If you need a dial out or would like to submit an apology, please email gnso-secs@icann.org<mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org>. Kind regards, Julie ________________________________ This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
Good questions. Can we address these on the call in about 20 minutes? Jeff Neuman Senior Vice President Com Laude | Valideus D: +1.703.635.7514 E: jeff.neuman@comlaude.com<mailto:jeff.neuman@comlaude.com> From: Gnso-newgtld-wg <gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of Aikman-Scalese, Anne Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2020 2:02 PM To: Emily Barabas <emily.barabas@icann.org>; Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@icann.org>; gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org Subject: Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Proposed Agenda - New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG - Thursday, 28 May at 20:00 UTC for 90 Minutes Thank you, Emily. Jeff and Cheryl, do we take from this document that all Recommendations are meant to be “MUST” and all Implementation Guidance is meant to be “SHOULD”? (If so, don’t we have some recommendations which state something the ICANN Board should do (which cannot say MUST) cause neither we nor Council has that level of authority over the Board, which is bound by its own fiduciary duties. Regarding the “No Agreement” section in the document linked below, could you please give us some examples on the call of the “very few” areas where the WG did not reach agreement? In that definition, are you getting at the issue of “agreement” or the issue of “consensus”? Thank you, Anne From: Gnso-newgtld-wg <gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces@icann.org<mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces@icann.org>> On Behalf Of Emily Barabas Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2020 10:42 AM To: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@icann.org<mailto:julie.hedlund@icann.org>>; gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org<mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Proposed Agenda - New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG - Thursday, 28 May at 20:00 UTC for 90 Minutes [EXTERNAL] ________________________________ Dear all, The Co-Chairs will reference one additional document on today’s call, available here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CYOruGqewTsu5ejL_zoom0ol6VA1xMLX2FXW2VAy... This short document contains draft definitions of terms that are used in the draft Final Report sections, including Affirmation, Affirmation with modification, Recommendation, Implementation Guidance, and No Agreement. It also discusses use of the terms “should” and “must.” Kind regards, Emily From: Gnso-newgtld-wg <gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces@icann.org<mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces@icann.org>> on behalf of Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@icann.org<mailto:julie.hedlund@icann.org>> Date: Tuesday, 26 May 2020 at 20:56 To: "gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org<mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org>" <gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org<mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org>> Subject: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Proposed Agenda - New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG - Thursday, 28 May at 20:00 UTC for 90 Minutes Dear all, Please find below the proposed agenda for the call on Thursday, 28 May 2020 at 20:00 UTC for 90 minutes. Proposed Agenda: 1. Review Agenda/Updates to Statements of Interest 2. Discussion of Final Report Topics: * Review "Can't Live With" comments on packages 1-3: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Hh8Wj3IwXvi91Am1k4Zoooct2zmPOmVe1pLmjQLu... [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_documen...> * Review Category 1/Verified TLDs in 2.3.2 Registry commitments / Public Interest Commitments: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1kUlmZH8nxWTgfcRluA5FxLheMm4XhhOwkRt7om52... [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_documen...>, page 139; see also the ICANN46 Beijing Communique’ at: https://gac.icann.org/contentMigrated/icann46-beijing-communique [gac.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gac.icann.org_contentMi...> 3. AOB If you need a dial out or would like to submit an apology, please email gnso-secs@icann.org<mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org>. Kind regards, Julie ________________________________ This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521. ________________________________ The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential to the intended recipient. They may not be disclosed, used by or copied in any way by anyone other than the intended recipient. If you have received this message in error, please return it to the sender (deleting the body of the email and attachments in your reply) and immediately and permanently delete it. Please note that the Com Laude Group does not accept any responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan or otherwise check this email and any attachments. The Com Laude Group does not accept liability for statements which are clearly the sender's own and not made on behalf of the group or one of its member entities. The Com Laude Group includes Nom-IQ Limited t/a Com Laude, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 5047655 and registered office at 28-30 Little Russell Street, London, WC1A 2HN England; Valideus Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 06181291 and registered office at 28-30 Little Russell Street, London, WC1A 2HN England; Demys Limited, a company registered in Scotland with company number SC197176, having its registered office at 33 Melville Street, Edinburgh, Lothian, EH3 7JF Scotland; Consonum, Inc. dba Com Laude USA and Valideus USA, headquartered at 1751 Pinnacle Drive, Suite 600, McLean, VA 22102, USA; Com Laude (Japan) Corporation, a company registered in Japan having its registered office at Suite 319,1-3-21 Shinkawa, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0033, Japan. For further information see www.comlaude.com<https://comlaude.com>
participants (3)
-
Aikman-Scalese, Anne -
Emily Barabas -
Jeff Neuman