Scheduling Call for 29 February: New gTLD Subsequent Procedures WG
Dear New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Working Group (WG) members, Per the action item on today’s call, staff have reviewed the GNSO schedule and found that there are no conflicts to hold a call on 29 February at 2200 UTC. Also, after reviewing the chat room transcript there seemed to be support for holding the call at that day and time. Thus, in the interest of getting the call on everyone’s schedule as quickly as possible, we will proceed to have the GNSO Secretariat schedule the call. Kind regards, Julie
Hi, Thanks Julie for sharing this. I would like to highlight that doesn't make sense to poll about next call time only those who could attend today in first place. I hope that we are planning some rotation of confcall times. Best. Rafik On Feb 23, 2016 9:13 AM, "Julie Hedlund via Gnso-newgtld-wg" < gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org> wrote:
Dear New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Working Group (WG) members,
Per the action item on today’s call, staff have reviewed the GNSO schedule and found that there are no conflicts to hold a call on 29 February at 2200 UTC. Also, after reviewing the chat room transcript there seemed to be support for holding the call at that day and time. Thus, in the interest of getting the call on everyone’s schedule as quickly as possible, we will proceed to have the GNSO Secretariat schedule the call.
Kind regards, Julie
_______________________________________________ Gnso-newgtld-wg mailing list Gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg
Dear Rafik, Thank you very much for your helpful comments. As directed in the actions from today’s call staff also is creating a Doodle poll to determine the preference for the rotation of conference call times for the regular meeting schedule following ICANN 55 in Marrakech. Kind regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director From: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@gmail.com> Date: Monday, February 22, 2016 at 7:33 PM To: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@icann.org> Cc: "gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org" <gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Scheduling Call for 29 February: New gTLD Subsequent Procedures WG Hi, Thanks Julie for sharing this. I would like to highlight that doesn't make sense to poll about next call time only those who could attend today in first place. I hope that we are planning some rotation of confcall times. Best. Rafik On Feb 23, 2016 9:13 AM, "Julie Hedlund via Gnso-newgtld-wg" <gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org> wrote: Dear New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Working Group (WG) members, Per the action item on today’s call, staff have reviewed the GNSO schedule and found that there are no conflicts to hold a call on 29 February at 2200 UTC. Also, after reviewing the chat room transcript there seemed to be support for holding the call at that day and time. Thus, in the interest of getting the call on everyone’s schedule as quickly as possible, we will proceed to have the GNSO Secretariat schedule the call. Kind regards, Julie _______________________________________________ Gnso-newgtld-wg mailing list Gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg
+1 The call was re-scheduled so some people who might have attended on the original time couldn’t at the new time If there is to be any kind of poll about call times it should be with the entire group Regards Michele -- Mr Michele Neylon Blacknight Solutions Hosting, Colocation & Domains http://www.blacknight.host/ http://blog.blacknight.com/ http://ceo.hosting/ Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072 Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090 ------------------------------- Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland Company No.: 370845 From: <gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces@icann.org<mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces@icann.org>> on behalf of Rafik Dammak via Gnso-newgtld-wg <gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org<mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org>> Reply-To: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@gmail.com<mailto:rafik.dammak@gmail.com>> Date: Tuesday 23 February 2016 at 00:33 To: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@icann.org<mailto:julie.hedlund@icann.org>> Cc: "gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org<mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org>" <gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org<mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org>> Subject: Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Scheduling Call for 29 February: New gTLD Subsequent Procedures WG Hi, Thanks Julie for sharing this. I would like to highlight that doesn't make sense to poll about next call time only those who could attend today in first place. I hope that we are planning some rotation of confcall times. Best. Rafik On Feb 23, 2016 9:13 AM, "Julie Hedlund via Gnso-newgtld-wg" <gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org<mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org>> wrote: Dear New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Working Group (WG) members, Per the action item on today’s call, staff have reviewed the GNSO schedule and found that there are no conflicts to hold a call on 29 February at 2200 UTC. Also, after reviewing the chat room transcript there seemed to be support for holding the call at that day and time. Thus, in the interest of getting the call on everyone’s schedule as quickly as possible, we will proceed to have the GNSO Secretariat schedule the call. Kind regards, Julie _______________________________________________ Gnso-newgtld-wg mailing list Gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org<mailto:Gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg
Hi Michele, Indeed, there is a poll that Steve Chan has just sent about the rotation of call times post-ICANN 55. It seemed to staff that the sense of today’s call was that since time is so short prior to Marrakech (and people are traveling next week) we should schedule the call for next Monday the 29th at the same time as today’s call — recognizing that the time may not work for some people. Kind regards, Julie From: Michele Neylon - Blacknight <michele@blacknight.com> Date: Monday, February 22, 2016 at 8:05 PM To: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@gmail.com>, Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@icann.org> Cc: "gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org" <gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Scheduling Call for 29 February: New gTLD Subsequent Procedures WG +1 The call was re-scheduled so some people who might have attended on the original time couldn’t at the new time If there is to be any kind of poll about call times it should be with the entire group Regards Michele -- Mr Michele Neylon Blacknight Solutions Hosting, Colocation & Domains http://www.blacknight.host/ http://blog.blacknight.com/ http://ceo.hosting/ Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072 Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090 ------------------------------- Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland Company No.: 370845 From: <gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Rafik Dammak via Gnso-newgtld-wg <gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org> Reply-To: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@gmail.com> Date: Tuesday 23 February 2016 at 00:33 To: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@icann.org> Cc: "gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org" <gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Scheduling Call for 29 February: New gTLD Subsequent Procedures WG Hi, Thanks Julie for sharing this. I would like to highlight that doesn't make sense to poll about next call time only those who could attend today in first place. I hope that we are planning some rotation of confcall times. Best. Rafik On Feb 23, 2016 9:13 AM, "Julie Hedlund via Gnso-newgtld-wg" <gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org> wrote: Dear New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Working Group (WG) members, Per the action item on today’s call, staff have reviewed the GNSO schedule and found that there are no conflicts to hold a call on 29 February at 2200 UTC. Also, after reviewing the chat room transcript there seemed to be support for holding the call at that day and time. Thus, in the interest of getting the call on everyone’s schedule as quickly as possible, we will proceed to have the GNSO Secretariat schedule the call. Kind regards, Julie _______________________________________________ Gnso-newgtld-wg mailing list Gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg
Dear WG Members, Thank you for your continued participation in the Doodle poll regarding the recurring meeting schedule post ICANN55. Separately, regarding the upcoming WG call that is currently scheduled for 29 February at 22:00 UTC, unfortunately, staff missed a conflict with a Special GNSO Council meeting (which I would note Paul McGrady, at least, raised as a concern during the first call). As a result, we have prepared a Doodle poll to select an alternative time, which I am hoping to complete by Wednesday, 23:39 UTC to allow for some advanced notice to WG members. Please note your availability in the poll here and apologies for the confusion: http://doodle.com/poll/gc6k935c9qqzxdm2. Best, Steve From: <gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Julie Hedlund via Gnso-newgtld-wg <gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org> Reply-To: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@icann.org> Date: Monday, February 22, 2016 at 5:16 PM To: Michele Neylon - Blacknight <michele@blacknight.com>, Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@gmail.com> Cc: "gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org" <gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Scheduling Call for 29 February: New gTLD Subsequent Procedures WG Hi Michele, Indeed, there is a poll that Steve Chan has just sent about the rotation of call times post-ICANN 55. It seemed to staff that the sense of today¹s call was that since time is so short prior to Marrakech (and people are traveling next week) we should schedule the call for next Monday the 29th at the same time as today¹s call recognizing that the time may not work for some people. Kind regards, Julie From: Michele Neylon - Blacknight <michele@blacknight.com> Date: Monday, February 22, 2016 at 8:05 PM To: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@gmail.com>, Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@icann.org> Cc: "gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org" <gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Scheduling Call for 29 February: New gTLD Subsequent Procedures WG +1 The call was re-scheduled so some people who might have attended on the original time couldn¹t at the new time If there is to be any kind of poll about call times it should be with the entire group Regards Michele -- Mr Michele Neylon Blacknight Solutions Hosting, Colocation & Domains http://www.blacknight.host/ http://blog.blacknight.com/ http://ceo.hosting/ Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072 Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090 ------------------------------- Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland Company No.: 370845 From: <gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Rafik Dammak via Gnso-newgtld-wg <gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org> Reply-To: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@gmail.com> Date: Tuesday 23 February 2016 at 00:33 To: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@icann.org> Cc: "gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org" <gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Scheduling Call for 29 February: New gTLD Subsequent Procedures WG
Hi,
Thanks Julie for sharing this. I would like to highlight that doesn't make sense to poll about next call time only those who could attend today in first place. I hope that we are planning some rotation of confcall times.
Best.
Rafik
On Feb 23, 2016 9:13 AM, "Julie Hedlund via Gnso-newgtld-wg" <gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org> wrote:
Dear New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Working Group (WG) members,
Per the action item on today¹s call, staff have reviewed the GNSO schedule and found that there are no conflicts to hold a call on 29 February at 2200 UTC. Also, after reviewing the chat room transcript there seemed to be support for holding the call at that day and time. Thus, in the interest of getting the call on everyone¹s schedule as quickly as possible, we will proceed to have the GNSO Secretariat schedule the call.
Kind regards, Julie
_______________________________________________ Gnso-newgtld-wg mailing list Gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg
participants (4)
-
Julie Hedlund -
Michele Neylon - Blacknight -
Rafik Dammak -
Steve Chan