- Initial Report Excerpts Red-lines and Updated Preamble
Dear WG Members, As noted by Jeff a short while ago, the red-lined excerpts have all been made available on the Wiki here: https://community.icann.org/x/NwUhB. On this page, you will a full set of red-lined excerpts, all sections in a single document. You will also find extracts of each section as well. All of these documents are available in Word and PDF. Included as well on this page is the latest version of the remaining elements of the Initial Report, which includes edits suggested by WG members to the Preamble. The next steps from the staff side are to complete some of the remaining elements in the Initial Report, as well as to begin integrating the excerpts into the report. If you have any questions, please do let us know. Best, Steve, Emily, and Julie Steven Chan Policy Director, GNSO Support ICANN 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536 steve.chan@icann.org mobile: +1.310.339.4410 office tel: +1.310.301.5800 office fax: +1.310.823.8649 Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages. Follow @GNSO on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ICANN_GNSO Follow the GNSO on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/icanngnso/ http://gnso.icann.org/en/
Thanks Steve. Just to clarify what Steve has said below, when he refers to the”remaining elements in the Initial Report” he is referring to purely administrative items such as (a) insertion of the participant list in the applicable Annex, (b) copying the preliminary recommendations and the questions for community input and putting them in the appropriate Annexes, (c) ensuring that the font is the same throughout the report, (d) ensuring consistency with how we refer to the Applicant Guidebook, the 2007 GNSO Final Report, and other terms, etc. He is not referring to substantive sections that have to be written which would need Working Group review. Thanks. Best regards, Jeffrey J. Neuman Senior Vice President Com Laude USA / Valideus USA 1751 Pinnacle Dr., Suite 600 McLean, VA 22102 Jeff.Neuman@comlaude.com<mailto:Jeff.Neuman@comlaude.com> +1 (202) 549-5079 On Jun 20, 2018, at 1:30 AM, Steve Chan <steve.chan@icann.org<mailto:steve.chan@icann.org>> wrote: Dear WG Members, As noted by Jeff a short while ago, the red-lined excerpts have all been made available on the Wiki here: https://community.icann.org/x/NwUhB. On this page, you will a full set of red-lined excerpts, all sections in a single document. You will also find extracts of each section as well. All of these documents are available in Word and PDF. Included as well on this page is the latest version of the remaining elements of the Initial Report, which includes edits suggested by WG members to the Preamble. The next steps from the staff side are to complete some of the remaining elements in the Initial Report, as well as to begin integrating the excerpts into the report. If you have any questions, please do let us know. Best, Steve, Emily, and Julie Steven Chan Policy Director, GNSO Support ICANN 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536 steve.chan@icann.org<mailto:steve.chan@icann.org> mobile: +1.310.339.4410 office tel: +1.310.301.5800 office fax: +1.310.823.8649 Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses<applewebdata://310CAD3E-E244-4690-A938-C2655DD44BDE/learn.icann.org/courses/gnso> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages<http://gnso.icann.org/sites/gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/presentations/policy-e...>. Follow @GNSO on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ICANN_GNSO Follow the GNSO on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/icanngnso/ http://gnso.icann.org/en/ _______________________________________________ Gnso-newgtld-wg mailing list Gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org<mailto:Gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg
Thanks Jeff. Is there a particular time when we will have the complete, entire redlined draft report including Annexes with the all the questions in one document? (That would be handy.) Anne E. Aikman-Scalese Of Counsel 520.629.4428 office 520.879.4725 fax AAikman@lrrc.com<mailto:AAikman@lrrc.com> _____________________________ [cid:image003.png@01D408BE.55AF5770] Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP One South Church Avenue, Suite 2000 Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 lrrc.com<http://lrrc.com/> From: Gnso-newgtld-wg [mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Neuman Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2018 4:03 AM To: Steve Chan Cc: gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org Subject: Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] - Initial Report Excerpts Red-lines and Updated Preamble Thanks Steve. Just to clarify what Steve has said below, when he refers to the”remaining elements in the Initial Report” he is referring to purely administrative items such as (a) insertion of the participant list in the applicable Annex, (b) copying the preliminary recommendations and the questions for community input and putting them in the appropriate Annexes, (c) ensuring that the font is the same throughout the report, (d) ensuring consistency with how we refer to the Applicant Guidebook, the 2007 GNSO Final Report, and other terms, etc. He is not referring to substantive sections that have to be written which would need Working Group review. Thanks. Best regards, Jeffrey J. Neuman Senior Vice President Com Laude USA / Valideus USA 1751 Pinnacle Dr., Suite 600 McLean, VA 22102 Jeff.Neuman@comlaude.com<mailto:Jeff.Neuman@comlaude.com> +1 (202) 549-5079 On Jun 20, 2018, at 1:30 AM, Steve Chan <steve.chan@icann.org<mailto:steve.chan@icann.org>> wrote: Dear WG Members, As noted by Jeff a short while ago, the red-lined excerpts have all been made available on the Wiki here: https://community.icann.org/x/NwUhB. On this page, you will a full set of red-lined excerpts, all sections in a single document. You will also find extracts of each section as well. All of these documents are available in Word and PDF. Included as well on this page is the latest version of the remaining elements of the Initial Report, which includes edits suggested by WG members to the Preamble. The next steps from the staff side are to complete some of the remaining elements in the Initial Report, as well as to begin integrating the excerpts into the report. If you have any questions, please do let us know. Best, Steve, Emily, and Julie Steven Chan Policy Director, GNSO Support ICANN 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536 steve.chan@icann.org<mailto:steve.chan@icann.org> mobile: +1.310.339.4410 office tel: +1.310.301.5800 office fax: +1.310.823.8649 Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses<applewebdata://310CAD3E-E244-4690-A938-C2655DD44BDE/learn.icann.org/courses/gnso> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages<http://gnso.icann.org/sites/gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/presentations/policy-e...>. Follow @GNSO on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ICANN_GNSO Follow the GNSO on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/icanngnso/ http://gnso.icann.org/en/ _______________________________________________ Gnso-newgtld-wg mailing list Gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org<mailto:Gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg ________________________________ This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
+1 ________________________________ Von: Aikman-Scalese, Anne <AAikman@lrrc.com> Datum: 21. Juni 2018 um 02:45:13 MESZ An: 'Jeff Neuman' <jeff.neuman@comlaude.com>, Steve Chan <steve.chan@icann.org> Cc: gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org <gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org> Betreff: Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] - Initial Report Excerpts Red-lines and Updated Preamble Thanks Jeff. Is there a particular time when we will have the complete, entire redlined draft report including Annexes with the all the questions in one document? (That would be handy.) Anne E. Aikman-Scalese Of Counsel 520.629.4428 office 520.879.4725 fax AAikman@lrrc.com<mailto:AAikman@lrrc.com> _____________________________ [cid:image003.png@01D408BE.55AF5770] Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP One South Church Avenue, Suite 2000 Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 lrrc.com<http://lrrc.com/> From: Gnso-newgtld-wg [mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Neuman Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2018 4:03 AM To: Steve Chan Cc: gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org Subject: Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] - Initial Report Excerpts Red-lines and Updated Preamble Thanks Steve. Just to clarify what Steve has said below, when he refers to the”remaining elements in the Initial Report” he is referring to purely administrative items such as (a) insertion of the participant list in the applicable Annex, (b) copying the preliminary recommendations and the questions for community input and putting them in the appropriate Annexes, (c) ensuring that the font is the same throughout the report, (d) ensuring consistency with how we refer to the Applicant Guidebook, the 2007 GNSO Final Report, and other terms, etc. He is not referring to substantive sections that have to be written which would need Working Group review. Thanks. Best regards, Jeffrey J. Neuman Senior Vice President Com Laude USA / Valideus USA 1751 Pinnacle Dr., Suite 600 McLean, VA 22102 Jeff.Neuman@comlaude.com<mailto:Jeff.Neuman@comlaude.com> +1 (202) 549-5079 On Jun 20, 2018, at 1:30 AM, Steve Chan <steve.chan@icann.org<mailto:steve.chan@icann.org>> wrote: Dear WG Members, As noted by Jeff a short while ago, the red-lined excerpts have all been made available on the Wiki here: https://community.icann.org/x/NwUhB. On this page, you will a full set of red-lined excerpts, all sections in a single document. You will also find extracts of each section as well. All of these documents are available in Word and PDF. Included as well on this page is the latest version of the remaining elements of the Initial Report, which includes edits suggested by WG members to the Preamble. The next steps from the staff side are to complete some of the remaining elements in the Initial Report, as well as to begin integrating the excerpts into the report. If you have any questions, please do let us know. Best, Steve, Emily, and Julie Steven Chan Policy Director, GNSO Support ICANN 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536 steve.chan@icann.org<mailto:steve.chan@icann.org> mobile: +1.310.339.4410 office tel: +1.310.301.5800 office fax: +1.310.823.8649 Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages<http://gnso.icann.org/sites/gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/presentations/policy-e...>. Follow @GNSO on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ICANN_GNSO Follow the GNSO on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/icanngnso/ http://gnso.icann.org/en/ _______________________________________________ Gnso-newgtld-wg mailing list Gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org<mailto:Gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg ________________________________ This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
Anne, To be honest, the Annexes which are going to literally copy word from word from the main body of the document (like the preliminary recommendations and the things we are soliciting for public comment), we were not planning to do a draft of for version control reasons. We didn’t want to have a separate Annex now, then have to fix changes in both versions if there are changes to either of those. I will discuss with staff today to see what we can do. Jeffrey J. Neuman Senior Vice President |Valideus USA | Com Laude USA 1751 Pinnacle Drive, Suite 600 Mclean, VA 22102, United States E: jeff.neuman@valideus.com or jeff.neuman@comlaude.com T: +1.703.635.7514 M: +1.202.549.5079 @Jintlaw -----Original Message----- From: Jorge.Cancio@bakom.admin.ch <Jorge.Cancio@bakom.admin.ch> Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2018 2:46 AM To: AAikman@lrrc.com; Jeff Neuman <jeff.neuman@comlaude.com>; steve.chan@icann.org Cc: gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org Subject: Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] - Initial Report Excerpts Red-lines and Updated Preamble +1 ________________________________ Von: Aikman-Scalese, Anne <AAikman@lrrc.com> Datum: 21. Juni 2018 um 02:45:13 MESZ An: 'Jeff Neuman' <jeff.neuman@comlaude.com>, Steve Chan <steve.chan@icann.org> Cc: gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org <gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org> Betreff: Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] - Initial Report Excerpts Red-lines and Updated Preamble Thanks Jeff. Is there a particular time when we will have the complete, entire redlined draft report including Annexes with the all the questions in one document? (That would be handy.) Anne E. Aikman-Scalese Of Counsel 520.629.4428 office 520.879.4725 fax AAikman@lrrc.com<mailto:AAikman@lrrc.com> _____________________________ [cid:image003.png@01D408BE.55AF5770] Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP One South Church Avenue, Suite 2000 Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 lrrc.com<http://lrrc.com/> From: Gnso-newgtld-wg [mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Neuman Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2018 4:03 AM To: Steve Chan Cc: gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org Subject: Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] - Initial Report Excerpts Red-lines and Updated Preamble Thanks Steve. Just to clarify what Steve has said below, when he refers to the”remaining elements in the Initial Report” he is referring to purely administrative items such as (a) insertion of the participant list in the applicable Annex, (b) copying the preliminary recommendations and the questions for community input and putting them in the appropriate Annexes, (c) ensuring that the font is the same throughout the report, (d) ensuring consistency with how we refer to the Applicant Guidebook, the 2007 GNSO Final Report, and other terms, etc. He is not referring to substantive sections that have to be written which would need Working Group review. Thanks. Best regards, Jeffrey J. Neuman Senior Vice President Com Laude USA / Valideus USA 1751 Pinnacle Dr., Suite 600 McLean, VA 22102 Jeff.Neuman@comlaude.com<mailto:Jeff.Neuman@comlaude.com> +1 (202) 549-5079 On Jun 20, 2018, at 1:30 AM, Steve Chan <steve.chan@icann.org<mailto:steve.chan@icann.org>> wrote: Dear WG Members, As noted by Jeff a short while ago, the red-lined excerpts have all been made available on the Wiki here: https://community.icann.org/x/NwUhB. On this page, you will a full set of red-lined excerpts, all sections in a single document. You will also find extracts of each section as well. All of these documents are available in Word and PDF. Included as well on this page is the latest version of the remaining elements of the Initial Report, which includes edits suggested by WG members to the Preamble. The next steps from the staff side are to complete some of the remaining elements in the Initial Report, as well as to begin integrating the excerpts into the report. If you have any questions, please do let us know. Best, Steve, Emily, and Julie Steven Chan Policy Director, GNSO Support ICANN 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536 steve.chan@icann.org<mailto:steve.chan@icann.org> mobile: +1.310.339.4410 office tel: +1.310.301.5800 office fax: +1.310.823.8649 Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages<http://gnso.icann.org/sites/gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/presentations/policy-e...>. Follow @GNSO on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ICANN_GNSO Follow the GNSO on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/icanngnso/ http://gnso.icann.org/en/ _______________________________________________ Gnso-newgtld-wg mailing list Gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org<mailto:Gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg ________________________________ This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
Jeff and Cheryl, Thanks for the redlined versions and the opportunity to comment further to make sure the draft accurately reflects discussion in the Works Tracks. I have only two requested additions. Although there are appropriate references to the Council of Europe’s emphasis on Freedom of Expression, the issue discussed in Work Track 3 about the definition of Community in relation to the Principle of Applicant's Freedom of Expression has not been made clear in the draft of 1.9.1. The following changes are needed: 1. in Section f. Deliberations, the following language in red should be added to the current language in black: "One suggestion is that protecting minority or disadvantaged communities' “identity” and their ability to self-identify, self-associate, and organize in the domain name system is among the goals of the “community” process. The Work Track developed a draft definition that has been discussed with the wider community, but it received minimal support.[1] As a next step towards establishing a definition, the WT will take input from the community to better understand the purpose and goal of having community-based applications in the New gTLD Program. However, concern was also expressed that any limitation on the existing broad definition of "community", would (1) violate the Principle of Applicant Freedom of Expression and (2) involve ICANN in the evaluation and regulation of content to a degree that exceeds its mission. Second Item: ADD TO Question 1. on which WG is seeking input: (It is noted that this question has several questions in the text and would be easier to understand if divided.) Or else make this Question 2: Do you agree or disagree that the definition of "community" that applied in the 2012 round should be modified? (link to definition from the 2012 round) Separately, I support the change to Deliberations requested by Jamie Baxter in relation to the definition of community. Thank you, Anne Anne E. Aikman-Scalese Of Counsel 520.629.4428 office 520.879.4725 fax AAikman@lrrc.com _____________________________ Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP One South Church Avenue, Suite 2000 Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 lrrc.com -----Original Message----- From: Jeff Neuman [mailto:jeff.neuman@comlaude.com] Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2018 9:20 AM To: Jorge.Cancio@bakom.admin.ch; Aikman-Scalese, Anne; steve.chan@icann.org Cc: gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org Subject: RE: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] - Initial Report Excerpts Red-lines and Updated Preamble Anne, To be honest, the Annexes which are going to literally copy word from word from the main body of the document (like the preliminary recommendations and the things we are soliciting for public comment), we were not planning to do a draft of for version control reasons. We didn’t want to have a separate Annex now, then have to fix changes in both versions if there are changes to either of those. I will discuss with staff today to see what we can do. Jeffrey J. Neuman Senior Vice President |Valideus USA | Com Laude USA 1751 Pinnacle Drive, Suite 600 Mclean, VA 22102, United States E: jeff.neuman@valideus.com<mailto:jeff.neuman@valideus.com> or jeff.neuman@comlaude.com<mailto:jeff.neuman@comlaude.com> T: +1.703.635.7514 M: +1.202.549.5079 @Jintlaw -----Original Message----- From: Jorge.Cancio@bakom.admin.ch<mailto:Jorge.Cancio@bakom.admin.ch> <Jorge.Cancio@bakom.admin.ch<mailto:Jorge.Cancio@bakom.admin.ch>> Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2018 2:46 AM To: AAikman@lrrc.com<mailto:AAikman@lrrc.com>; Jeff Neuman <jeff.neuman@comlaude.com<mailto:jeff.neuman@comlaude.com>>; steve.chan@icann.org<mailto:steve.chan@icann.org> Cc: gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org<mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] - Initial Report Excerpts Red-lines and Updated Preamble +1 ________________________________ Von: Aikman-Scalese, Anne <AAikman@lrrc.com<mailto:AAikman@lrrc.com>> Datum: 21. Juni 2018 um 02:45:13 MESZ An: 'Jeff Neuman' <jeff.neuman@comlaude.com<mailto:jeff.neuman@comlaude.com>>, Steve Chan <steve.chan@icann.org<mailto:steve.chan@icann.org>> Cc: gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org<mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org> <gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org<mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org>> Betreff: Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] - Initial Report Excerpts Red-lines and Updated Preamble Thanks Jeff. Is there a particular time when we will have the complete, entire redlined draft report including Annexes with the all the questions in one document? (That would be handy.) Anne E. Aikman-Scalese Of Counsel 520.629.4428 office 520.879.4725 fax AAikman@lrrc.com<mailto:AAikman@lrrc.com<mailto:AAikman@lrrc.com%3cmailto:AAikman@lrrc.com>> _____________________________ [cid:image003.png@01D408BE.55AF5770] Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP One South Church Avenue, Suite 2000 Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 lrrc.com<http://lrrc.com/> From: Gnso-newgtld-wg [mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Neuman Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2018 4:03 AM To: Steve Chan Cc: gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org<mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] - Initial Report Excerpts Red-lines and Updated Preamble Thanks Steve. Just to clarify what Steve has said below, when he refers to the”remaining elements in the Initial Report” he is referring to purely administrative items such as (a) insertion of the participant list in the applicable Annex, (b) copying the preliminary recommendations and the questions for community input and putting them in the appropriate Annexes, (c) ensuring that the font is the same throughout the report, (d) ensuring consistency with how we refer to the Applicant Guidebook, the 2007 GNSO Final Report, and other terms, etc. He is not referring to substantive sections that have to be written which would need Working Group review. Thanks. Best regards, Jeffrey J. Neuman Senior Vice President Com Laude USA / Valideus USA 1751 Pinnacle Dr., Suite 600 McLean, VA 22102 Jeff.Neuman@comlaude.com<mailto:Jeff.Neuman@comlaude.com<mailto:Jeff.Neuman@comlaude.com%3cmailto:Jeff.Neuman@comlaude.com>> +1 (202) 549-5079 On Jun 20, 2018, at 1:30 AM, Steve Chan <steve.chan@icann.org<mailto:steve.chan@icann.org<mailto:steve.chan@icann.org%3cmailto:steve.chan@icann.org>>> wrote: Dear WG Members, As noted by Jeff a short while ago, the red-lined excerpts have all been made available on the Wiki here: https://community.icann.org/x/NwUhB. On this page, you will a full set of red-lined excerpts, all sections in a single document. You will also find extracts of each section as well. All of these documents are available in Word and PDF. Included as well on this page is the latest version of the remaining elements of the Initial Report, which includes edits suggested by WG members to the Preamble. The next steps from the staff side are to complete some of the remaining elements in the Initial Report, as well as to begin integrating the excerpts into the report. If you have any questions, please do let us know. Best, Steve, Emily, and Julie Steven Chan Policy Director, GNSO Support ICANN 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536 steve.chan@icann.org<mailto:steve.chan@icann.org<mailto:steve.chan@icann.org%3cmailto:steve.chan@icann.org>> mobile: +1.310.339.4410 office tel: +1.310.301.5800 office fax: +1.310.823.8649 Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages<http://gnso.icann.org/sites/gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/presentations/policy-e...>. Follow @GNSO on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ICANN_GNSO Follow the GNSO on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/icanngnso/ http://gnso.icann.org/en/ _______________________________________________ Gnso-newgtld-wg mailing list Gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org<mailto:Gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org<mailto:Gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org%3cmailto:Gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg ________________________________ This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521. ________________________________ This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
Dear Steve and WG Members, A few follow up comments about the latest redline version: 1.9 - Community Applications: (e) Questions After the second sentence in bullet #1, I believe the following should be inserted so as to not lead others into presumption that the Working Group fully agreed that the current definition of “community” is deficient, or that the overriding problem we are trying to address lies exclusively with the existing definition. I pointed this out on the June 18 call and I believe it was accepted as an additional question for this section. My suggestion would be something like (in RED): · … but no definition was universally agreed upon. Do you believe the current definition of “community” in the AGB is sufficiently clear and flexible to represent the intentions of existing policy about community applications and the various types of communities that may seek priority in the new gTLD program? If not, how would you define “community” for the purposes of community-based … My rationale for this was that existing policy and language seems quite inviting to varying types of communities, yet it was the evaluators that offered little flexibility in the way they addressed the various types of communities that applied for new gTLDs. Reflection on the 2012 round shows clear bias in favor of those community applicants representing an industry or commercial interest, yet that approach was not based in any legitimate reflection or interpretation of 1) the definition of “community” or 2) criteria provided in the AGB. Communities should not be at the short end of the stick in being awarded new gTLDs simply because evaluators are unable or unwilling to consider the various perspectives by which the AGB language and instruction have been interpreted and applied in context with the actual communities that community applications represent. (f) Deliberations The second bullet point is still factually incorrect. It needs to be clear that the CPE providers only published their CPE Guidelines after applications were submitted to ICANN. As I pointed out in a prior email on 6/13/18, the bullet should read: · Evaluation procedures for applications were only developed after the 2012 application window had already closed; I also reminded about the following deliberation point via email that appears to have been in part rejected in the latest redline. · Concern about contractual agreements ICANN knowingly made with CPE providers that prevented transparency of CPE documents and other related materials (as evidenced by recent threats by EIU to sue ICANN if information was released). What is missing is the transparency of contractual agreements ICANN makes with third party evaluators, specifically if ICANN should be allowed to make such agreements conducive to avoiding transparency. I would request that bullet #4 is further edited as follows: · Lack of transparency and predictability of Community Priority Evaluation (CPE), in terms of the process, documentation, third party evaluator contracts, and outcomes; Additionally, from an email I submitted on 6/13/18, the following points appear to have been partially rejected as part of deliberation points I previously raised in the WG. I request they be added to the record unless someone can provide me with rationale for not including them. 1. Concerns about processes described in the AGB and the CPE Guidelines that were not adhered to by the CPE Providers, or were not adhered to as strictly as the language provided for in published materials: a. Verification of support/opposition letters – all were to require verified, many were not verified without reason b. Party responsible for verification letters – was described by the CPE Provider in their own guidelines as a responsibility of one of the two CPE panelists, but actually done by CPE support staff 2. Concerns about the lack of oversight during CPE which resulted in poor performance of the CPE Providers: a. Verification emails were sent to endorsing organizations that contained response date requirements that had already expired. When reported to ICANN, no email correction was sent to the effected parties and ICANN instructed applicant to carry the burden of informing endorsing organizations to respond to emails anyway, despite the expired due date b. CPE Providers falling short on letter verification duties The only deliberation point currently reflecting any portion of these concerns is that final bullet point in the redline: · Concerns about process for reviewing support/opposition letter (e.g., scope of review, party performing review). I do not believe the full extent of concerns/experiences I have shared during deliberations are fully captured by this single bullet addition. Specifically missing are the overriding concerns I have raised in bullet #1 & #2 above which speak to the action/behavior of the CPE Providers and ICANN specifically as they relate to published standards and overall performance in CPE. Much thanks Jamie Jamie Baxter dotgay LLC <mailto:jamie@dotgay.com> jamie@dotgay.com <http://www.dotgay.com/> www.dotgay.com A Certified LGBT Business Enterprise (LGBTBE) Please join us on Facebook at <http://www.facebook.dotgay.com/> www.facebook.dotgay.com and follow us at <http://www.twitter.com/dotgay> www.twitter.com/dotgay From: Gnso-newgtld-wg [mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Steve Chan Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2018 1:30 AM To: gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org Subject: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] - Initial Report Excerpts Red-lines and Updated Preamble Dear WG Members, As noted by Jeff a short while ago, the red-lined excerpts have all been made available on the Wiki here: https://community.icann.org/x/NwUhB. On this page, you will a full set of red-lined excerpts, all sections in a single document. You will also find extracts of each section as well. All of these documents are available in Word and PDF. Included as well on this page is the latest version of the remaining elements of the Initial Report, which includes edits suggested by WG members to the Preamble. The next steps from the staff side are to complete some of the remaining elements in the Initial Report, as well as to begin integrating the excerpts into the report. If you have any questions, please do let us know. Best, Steve, Emily, and Julie Steven Chan Policy Director, GNSO Support ICANN 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536 steve.chan@icann.org mobile: +1.310.339.4410 office tel: +1.310.301.5800 office fax: +1.310.823.8649 Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses <applewebdata://310CAD3E-E244-4690-A938-C2655DD44BDE/learn.icann.org/courses/gnso> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages <http://gnso.icann.org/sites/gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/presentations/policy-e...> . Follow @GNSO on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ICANN_GNSO Follow the GNSO on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/icanngnso/ http://gnso.icann.org/en/ --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
With the caveat that I may have missed something (and, in that case, my comments on the transcript take precedence), attached and copied below is a chart of my redline comments. Section Comment 2.2.2.2.e.1 (Clarity of Application Process) Change question to: Is ICANN organization capable of scaling to handle application volume and, if not, what would have to happen in order for ICANN organization to scale? 2.2.4.e, bullet 1 (Different TLD Types) Add as last sentence to bullet: If so, which categories 2.2.4.f (Different TLD Types) Change last word in “validated registry” bullet from verified to validated 2.2.6.f (Accreditation Programs) Change “A new RSP must be evaluated prior to the ultimate selection of the Applicant to manage one or more specific TLDs.” to “A new RSP must be evaluated before the Applicant signs the Registry Agreement for the applied-for TLD(s).” 2.5.1.e, bullet 1 (Application Fees) Drop footnote to define “warehousing” and “squatting” Fn 219 Suggest deleting the link to my letter to John Jeffrey. (Link to decision in IO Community Objection against .AMAZON applications already included) K From: Gnso-newgtld-wg [mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Steve Chan Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2018 12:30 AM To: gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org Subject: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] - Initial Report Excerpts Red-lines and Updated Preamble Dear WG Members, As noted by Jeff a short while ago, the red-lined excerpts have all been made available on the Wiki here: https://community.icann.org/x/NwUhB. On this page, you will a full set of red-lined excerpts, all sections in a single document. You will also find extracts of each section as well. All of these documents are available in Word and PDF. Included as well on this page is the latest version of the remaining elements of the Initial Report, which includes edits suggested by WG members to the Preamble. The next steps from the staff side are to complete some of the remaining elements in the Initial Report, as well as to begin integrating the excerpts into the report. If you have any questions, please do let us know. Best, Steve, Emily, and Julie Steven Chan Policy Director, GNSO Support ICANN 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536 steve.chan@icann.org<mailto:steve.chan@icann.org> mobile: +1.310.339.4410 office tel: +1.310.301.5800 office fax: +1.310.823.8649 Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses<applewebdata://310CAD3E-E244-4690-A938-C2655DD44BDE/learn.icann.org/courses/gnso> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages<http://gnso.icann.org/sites/gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/presentations/policy-e...>. Follow @GNSO on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ICANN_GNSO Follow the GNSO on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/icanngnso/ http://gnso.icann.org/en/
Hi Kristina, Thank you very much for these helpful and detailed edits. Based on our review they all very clear and we don’t have any questions. We will integrate them. Kind regards, Julie From: Gnso-newgtld-wg <gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of "Rosette, Kristina via Gnso-newgtld-wg" <gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org> Reply-To: "Rosette, Kristina" <rosettek@amazon.com> Date: Thursday, June 28, 2018 at 3:11 PM To: Steve Chan <steve.chan@icann.org>, "gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org" <gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] - Initial Report Excerpts Red-lines and Updated Preamble With the caveat that I may have missed something (and, in that case, my comments on the transcript take precedence), attached and copied below is a chart of my redline comments. SectionComment 2.2.2.2.e.1 (Clarity of Application Process)Change question to: Is ICANN organization capable of scaling to handle application volume and, if not, what would have to happen in order for ICANN organization to scale? 2.2.4.e, bullet 1 (Different TLD Types)Add as last sentence to bullet: If so, which categories 2.2.4.f (Different TLD Types)Change last word in “validated registry” bullet from verified to validated 2.2.6.f (Accreditation Programs)Change “A new RSP must be evaluated prior to the ultimate selection of the Applicant to manage one or more specific TLDs.” to “A new RSP must be evaluated before the Applicant signs the Registry Agreement for the applied-for TLD(s).” 2.5.1.e, bullet 1 (Application Fees)Drop footnote to define “warehousing” and “squatting” Fn 219Suggest deleting the link to my letter to John Jeffrey. (Link to decision in IO Community Objection against .AMAZON applications already included) K From: Gnso-newgtld-wg [mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Steve Chan Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2018 12:30 AM To: gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org Subject: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] - Initial Report Excerpts Red-lines and Updated Preamble Dear WG Members, As noted by Jeff a short while ago, the red-lined excerpts have all been made available on the Wiki here: https://community.icann.org/x/NwUhB. On this page, you will a full set of red-lined excerpts, all sections in a single document. You will also find extracts of each section as well. All of these documents are available in Word and PDF. Included as well on this page is the latest version of the remaining elements of the Initial Report, which includes edits suggested by WG members to the Preamble. The next steps from the staff side are to complete some of the remaining elements in the Initial Report, as well as to begin integrating the excerpts into the report. If you have any questions, please do let us know. Best, Steve, Emily, and Julie Steven Chan Policy Director, GNSO Support ICANN 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536 steve.chan@icann.org mobile: +1.310.339.4410 office tel: +1.310.301.5800 office fax: +1.310.823.8649 Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages. Follow @GNSO on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ICANN_GNSO Follow the GNSO on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/icanngnso/ http://gnso.icann.org/en/
participants (7)
-
Aikman-Scalese, Anne -
Jamie Baxter -
Jeff Neuman -
Jorge.Cancio＠bakom.admin.ch -
Julie Hedlund -
Rosette, Kristina -
Steve Chan