Don , Should we consider some kind of dispute resolution system for conflicts and rules for avoiding or punishing those parties that try to game the system? Hector Héctor Ariel Manoff Vitale, Manoff & Feilbogen Viamonte 1145 10º Piso C1053ABW Buenos Aires República Argentina Te: (54-11) 4371-6100 Fax: (54-11) 4371-6365 E-mail: amanoff@vmf.com.ar Web: <http://www.vmf.com.ar> http://www.vmf.com.ar De: gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org] En nombre de Don Blumenthal Enviado el: jueves, 23 de enero de 2014 17:46 Para: PPSAI Asunto: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Latest Questions Groupings Document Good afternoon, We have done some more tweaking over the last couple of days. We tried to incorporate all suggestions that we received or heard on calls. However, some specific points were left out because they struck us as redundant. Dont hesitate to say put it back because it meant something else in a different group. The document still needs work: substance, organization, specific language, typos, and more. However, we are pushing it out now so that WG members have time to examine, comment, and edit. As I wrote before, the list will be a fluid document as we continue our work. Ill add a high level note. Our basic mission is to develop an accreditation system for p/p providers. Some might even argue that anything more is beyond our remit. Taking an expansive view, rules for use of p/p, or a determination that there should be no restrictions, will be part of developing the accreditation system. On the other hand, that p/p will continue strikes me as having been established by ICANN. I look forward to continuing our work. Regards, Don --- Este mensaje no contiene virus ni malware porque la protección de avast! Antivirus está activa. http://www.avast.com