Don and all, As we suggested earlier, and discussed in the last Group teleconference, it might be helpful, as a next step, if we reached a consensus on the groups of questions before sending them out to SO/ACs and SG/Cs. This would involve two steps: First, agreeing on the name of each group; and second, streamlining the questions in each group. In the first step, we could consider alternative headings (perhaps REGISTRATION instead of MAINTENANCE). And in the second step, we could remove duplicative or vague questions. This crystallization would make the questions more approachable, and encourage better responses. I hope these ideas are helpful. Best, Jim James L. Bikoff Silverberg, Goldman & Bikoff, LLP 1101 30th Street, NW Suite 120 Washington, DC 20007 Tel: 202-944-3303 Fax: 202-944-3306 jbikoff@sgbdc.com<mailto:jbikoff@sgbdc.com> From: Don Blumenthal <dblumenthal@pir.org<mailto:dblumenthal@pir.org>> Date: January 14, 2014 11:09:23 AM EST To: PPSAI <gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg@icann.org<mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg@icann.org>> Subject: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Carlton's closing chat question Carlton posted an issue that shouldn't wait a week: "John came up with 4 groups. Do we have a notion that others might be extracted? And where do we include/modify questions to address Stephanie's issue?" Jim had four groups and an umbrella Main category, which may be instructive in itself in guiding how we proceed organizationally. Regardless, the consensus of commenters has been that his document is a significant improvement over where we were before, and I suggest that we use it as a baseline. However, we still have work to do on it. Feel free to suggest modifications. Don _______________________________________________ Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg@icann.org<mailto:Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg