Hi Don, I still do not think "overwhelming majority" is an appropriate descriptor (and potentially not accurate) given that the GNSO has terms for properly determined levels of consensus (and a procedure by which to determine them). We discussed this last week and Marika provided a link to the GNSO guidelines. Talk to you all on the call. Thanks, Kiran Kiran Malancharuvil Internet Policy Counselor MarkMonitor 415-419-9138 (m) Sent from my mobile, please excuse any typos.
On May 19, 2014, at 9:04 AM, "Don Blumenthal" <dblumenthal@pir.org> wrote:
Hello,
Steve, Graeme, Marika, Mary, and I have gone back and forth a few times developing a template to capture Category C discussions. We see a lot of agreement within the WG but capturing the disagreements properly presented challenges.
As a result, I am sending draft template language covering the threshold through C.2 instead of the usual completed grid. Please review it carefully and respond on the list as much as possible. Discussion tomorrow hopefully will focus on C.3 and D.1. That’s easy for me to say, as I will be on an airplane tomorrow morning (again). :) Graeme also has to miss the call.
Regards,
Don
<Proposed Template Language for Cat C Threshold Question - 20140518.docx> _______________________________________________ Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg