Hi Kathy, 1) In your example the US Registrar is not aware that you will use Blacknights P/P service and tries to prevent their P/P data ending up at Blacknight. We have a simmilar thing going on with .DE transfers, to avoid our Admin C contact being used with domain names not under our management we force the registrant to provide a new Admin C contact when requesting an authcode. 2) Good point, looks like the policy when a registrar loses it's accreditation needs to be changed. Regards Theo ----- Oorspronkelijk bericht ----- Van: "Kathy Kleiman" <kathy@kathykleiman.com> Aan: gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg@icann.org Verzonden: Maandag 21 april 2014 22:53:15 Onderwerp: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] last transfer thoughts Hi All, I wanted to point out two other transfer scenarios where not publishing the Whois information of a proxy/privacy customer makes sense and seems fair: 1) I decide to transfer all my domain names to Blacknight from a US Registrar and its affiliated proxy/privacy service. In doing so, I sign up at transfer for Blacknight's proxy/privacy service. Why shouldn't my personal data be protected in that transfer -- with the Whois shifting from one proxy/privacy service provider to another, both with my underlying personal data? 2) My Registrar loses its accreditation and all domain names are transferred to Tucows. I sign up right away for Tucows privacy service. Why should my personal data be published in this already-difficult situation? Why should potentially thousands or even millions of registrants lose their privacy? Best and tx, Kathy _______________________________________________ Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg