Hello everyone, thanks for the quick responses from those in time zones friendly to rapid replies at this time!
From the responses so far, we can have a call tomorrow (Thursday) at 1500 but then Terri won’t be able to make it, or we can have the call on Friday at 1500 but then we won’t have Christian.
Kathy / Stephanie / David can you do either time? (I assume Susan will not be able to join) All should we try for Monday or Tuesday next week instead to see if everyone can make it? If there’s general consensus that this would be better, then I’ll send around a quick Doodle poll. Please let us know at your earliest convenience. Thank you! Cheers Mary Mary Wong Senior Policy Director Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN) Telephone: +1 603 574 4889 Email: mary.wong@icann.org From: Christian Dawson <dawson@i2coalition.com> Date: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 at 17:47 To: Lindsay Hamilton-Reid <Lindsay.Hamilton-Reid@fasthosts.com> Cc: Mary Wong <mary.wong@icann.org>, "gnso-ppsai2@icann.org" <gnso-ppsai2@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Gnso-ppsai2] Call to discuss next steps for Sub Team 2?
I can participate at the times listed Friday but not tomorrow.
Christian Dawson Chairman & Co-founder Internet Infrastructure Coalition (i2C) c: 703 623 2612 http://i2coalition.com <http://i2coalition.com/>
On Aug 12, 2015, at 5:40 PM, Lindsay Hamilton-Reid <Lindsay.Hamilton-Reid@fasthosts.com> wrote:
Hi Mary
Thanks for organising. I can do tomorrow any time and Friday at 1500 UTC.
I am on holiday for two weeks from Monday but I will be able to join group calls and do any work that is required.
Thanks
Lindsay
Sent from my iPhone
On 12 Aug 2015, at 21:41, Mary Wong <mary.wong@icann.org> wrote:
Dear all,
Just following up on previous threads regarding doing a call amongst the Sub Team members this week I am not sure if you will be available either tomorrow (Thursday) or Friday, but I thought it was incumbent on me to ask.
As we have different members in different time zones, finding one perfect time may be tricky, but may I start by suggesting either tomorrow, Thursday 13 August at either 1400 or 1500 UTC, or Friday 14 August at 1300, 1400 or 1500 UTC? Please reply to indicate which, if any, of these slots might work for you. If none works for most, I will send out a Doodle poll for next week.
For a proposed agenda, how does the following look? 1. Decide if and where to place the statement from the Save Domain Privacy petition that supports “the use of privacy services by all, for all legal purposes, regardless of whether the website is “commercial”.” 2. Review Summary of Answers to Question 1** 3. Decide if it will be necessary to move to analyze Questions 2** and 3 4. Decide appropriate treatment of additional, non-categorized responses**
** NOTE: I’ve updated the numbers in Lindsay’s and Terri’s summaries for Questions 1 & 2 to take into account the comments that were contained in answers to other preliminary recommendations but that, following the WG call two weeks ago, were moved to our Sub Team. I’m glad to say that these were few, and I do not think they change the analysis. For Agenda Item #4, these are essentially what was originally included as Question 4 in the Review Tool and that have not yet been reviewed by the Sub Team. I’ve now broken them out and uploaded it as a separate document on the wiki for ease of reference).
All the updated documents are here on the wiki: https://community.icann.org/x/0YZCAw
Thanks, everyone!
Cheers Mary
Mary Wong Senior Policy Director Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN) Telephone: +1 603 574 4889 Email: mary.wong@icann.org
From: Mary Wong <mary.wong@icann.org> Date: Thursday, August 6, 2015 at 12:46 To: Kathy Kleiman <kathy@kathykleiman.com> Cc: "gnso-ppsai2@icann.org" <gnso-ppsai2@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Gnso-ppsai2] A possible approach (Re: Proposed call)
Hi again Kathy and everyone,
We can check with Steve to make sure, but I thought that his request to the Sub Team was for the team to consider whether or not they believe, following analysis of Question 1, that there is a need to further analyze/make recommended changes resulting from responses to the other questions. To my mind that seemed different from actually collating and looking through those other responses in the first place, since it may be (for instance) that some comments in those other responses could be helpful either to another part of the Sub Team’s analysis or to another Sub Team. Of course, since staff has already compiled the responses to Questions 2 and 3 and a more general set of related comments (as Question 4), the Sub Team could agree that this is sufficient for the moment. However, it may still be helpful for someone to go through Question 4 (the general comments) to see if they belong anywhere else or if there is anything there to bring back to the WG.
As such, the Sub Team can proceed to decide on two things one, discuss and agree on whether the community’s answer to Question 1 is Yes or No; and two, discuss and agree then on whether or not to analyze rather than simply acknowledge the responses to Questions 2 and 3, and possibly the general non-categorized comments as well. This could be the agenda for the Sub Team call next week.
What do you think?
Cheers Mary
Mary Wong Senior Policy Director Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN) Telephone: +1 603 574 4889 Email: mary.wong@icann.org
From: Kathy Kleiman <kathy@kathykleiman.com> Date: Thursday, August 6, 2015 at 11:33 To: Mary Wong <mary.wong@icann.org> Cc: "gnso-ppsai2@icann.org" <gnso-ppsai2@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Gnso-ppsai2] A possible approach (Re: Proposed call)
Hi Mary, Tx you for your email, but I'm just the messenger. It was our co-chair, Steve M, who made the recommendation for time-saving reasons. Best, Kathy :
Hi Kathy - staff will defer to the Sub Team and the Working Group's decisions but nevertheless we would say that at minimum the comments and responses to all questions would merit some collation and consideration, even if ultimately the consensus is that the outcome of a threshold question is such as to render other questions and responses thereto either moot or not requiring modifications to what's in the Initial Report, for instance.
As such, we would respectfully suggest that at least a preliminary sweep through these other questions and responses be conducted, so that as a Working Group we can document that the group did indeed review and consider all input received per the expectations of the GNSO's PDP manual.
Cheers Mary
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 5, 2015, at 20:36, Kathy Kleiman <kathy@kathykleiman.com> wrote:
> Hi Mary and All, > Steve M. raised an interesting question when he was chairing the call on > Tuesday. As I heard it, he asked: if Question 1 is a threshold question, > and if there is an overwhelming response (as it was reported there was), > then do we even need to analyze the additional questions that follow > only if question #1 had a clear response the other way? > > It is a good question, and perhaps one we could discuss on our call next > week? It might save all of us a lot of work... > > Best, > Kathy > > : > Hello everyone, > > Going back to Lindsay’s original email suggestion and given everyone’s > commitments and schedules, how does the following approach sound? > > First, let’s get some volunteers to take on the preliminary review of > Questions 3 and 4 (which have many fewer responses than Questions 1 and > 2, > which Lindsay and Terri have already covered). The summary/analysis can > be > based on either Terri’s or Lindsay’s document formats. A possible “due > date” for these documents could be a week from now, i.e. Wednesday 12 > August. > > Secondly, the Sub Team can convene a call next week to discuss your > collective agreement on what recommendations to make to the full WG in > respect of Questions 1 & 2. Assuming that any additional entries to > these > questions (based on the forthcoming staff collation of comments for the > WG’s recommendations #10-20) can be provided to you all by the end of > this > week, perhaps this call can take place next Wednesday or Thursday? > > Thirdly, a similar discussion/call on Questions 3 and 4, plus an overall > assessment of the Sub Team’s recommendations on all the questions, can > be > scheduled for the week following, to give everyone a chance to review > what’s been done. The final consensus can then be compiled into a single > report for the full WG following this. > > I hope the above suggestions are useful, even if they are merely a > starting point for this group to decide when and how best you’d like to > proceed, and who is to volunteer for what. > > Cheers > > Mary > > Mary Wong > Senior Policy Director > Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN) > Telephone: +1 603 574 4889 > Email: mary.wong@icann.org > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: <gnso-ppsai2-bounces@icann.org> > <mailto:gnso-ppsai2-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Stephanie Perrin > <stephanie.perrin@mail.utoronto.ca> > <mailto:stephanie.perrin@mail.utoronto.ca> > Date: Wednesday, August 5, 2015 at 14:51 > To: "gnso-ppsai2@icann.org" <mailto:gnso-ppsai2@icann.org> > <gnso-ppsai2@icann.org> <mailto:gnso-ppsai2@icann.org> > Subject: Re: [Gnso-ppsai2] Proposed call > > I dont think it makes sense to meet if the ladies doing the work so far > cant be there. Can we push to next week? > Stephanie > > On 2015-08-05 13:43, Kiran Malancharuvil wrote: > I'm speaking at a conference on Friday, and won't be available. > > Kiran Malancharuvil > Policy Counselor > MarkMonitor > 415-419-9138 (m) > > Sent from my mobile, please excuse any typos. > > On Aug 5, 2015, at 10:42 AM, Mary Wong <mary.wong@icann.org> > <mailto:mary.wong@icann.org> wrote: > > Hello all, > > Based on 4 responses to the Doodle poll, it looks like this Friday 7 > August at either 1400 UTC or 1500 UTC will work for 3 out of the 4 > responders. I note, however, that none of the proposed times work for > BOTH > Lindsay and Terri, who have led the work so far on Questions 1 and 2. > > Can folks confirm whether they still want to go ahead with a meeting > this > Friday (largely administrative, as noted further below) or should we > try > to sort out the administrative issues/tasks by email first? > > > FYI the Sub Team wiki page has now been updated with all the latest > documents - the revised Public Comment Review Tool for Section 1.3.3, > and > Lindsay’s and Terri’s latest Summary Documents for Questions 1 & 2: > https://community.icann.org/x/0YZCAw. > > Thanks and cheers > Mary > > Mary Wong > Senior Policy Director > Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN) > Telephone: +1 603 574 4889 > Email: mary.wong@icann.org > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mary Wong <mary.wong@icann.org> <mailto:mary.wong@icann.org> > Date: Tuesday, August 4, 2015 at 12:41 > Cc: "gnso-ppsai2@icann.org" <mailto:gnso-ppsai2@icann.org> > <gnso-ppsai2@icann.org> <mailto:gnso-ppsai2@icann.org> > Subject: Re: [Gnso-ppsai2] Approach and coordination; further update to > Review Tool > > Hi Kiran and everyone, > > As I understand it, the purpose of the call will be mostly > administrative, > i.e. general discussion as to whether there’s agreement on how to move > forward, and how; whether to appoint a convenor or two; agree on > remaining > tasks and work assignments (including agreement on handling the > petitions > and mass comments). Hopefully having such a call relatively soon will > clarify timelines and tasks for everyone. > > Following from the WG call a while ago, I’ve gone back through the 20 > July > overall Public Comment Review Tool for Recommendations #1 through #9, > and > picked out those comments made by submitters that are directly > relevant to > this Sub Team (even if the submitters made those comments in apparent > response to other questions/recommendations). I’ve highlighted the > additions in yellow in the attached updated Review Tool for this Sub > Team > - basically, there are four additional rows for Question 1 and two > additional rows for Question 2 (sorry, Lindsay and Terri - I can help > with > incorporating them into your existing summary documents if you > prefer). > > It may be that there will be more such moves and additions as I > complete > the overall Review Tool for the remainder of the WG’s preliminary > recommendations. I’ll try to do that as quickly as I can this week, > and of > course will alert your group if there are to be further additions to > your > material. I’ll upload each update to the Sub Team wiki as well, so > everyone can see what the latest documents from everyone else is. > > Thanks and cheers > > Mary > > Mary Wong > Senior Policy Director > Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN) > Telephone: +1 603 574 4889 > Email: mary.wong@icann.org > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Kiran Malancharuvil <Kiran.Malancharuvil@markmonitor.com> > <mailto:Kiran.Malancharuvil@markmonitor.com> > Date: Tuesday, August 4, 2015 at 11:30 > To: Mary Wong <mary.wong@icann.org> <mailto:mary.wong@icann.org> > Cc: Lindsay Hamilton-Reid <Lindsay.Hamilton-Reid@fasthosts.com> > <mailto:Lindsay.Hamilton-Reid@fasthosts.com> , > "gnso-ppsai2@icann.org" <mailto:gnso-ppsai2@icann.org> > <gnso-ppsai2@icann.org> <mailto:gnso-ppsai2@icann.org> > Subject: Re: [Gnso-ppsai2] Approach and coordination > > Thanks all. Sorry for not being on the call this morning. I will > listen > to the recording asap. With so many people traveling this week or > out, > can we push our work to next week? I know we're on a time crunch but > this > train seems to be getting away from us. > > I > > Kiran Malancharuvil > Policy Counselor > MarkMonitor > 415-419-9138 (m) > > Sent from my mobile, please excuse any typos. > > On Aug 4, 2015, at 8:26 AM, Mary Wong > <mary.wong@icann.org<mailto:mary.wong@icann.org>> wrote: > > Hello Lindsay and all, > > I’ve created a Doodle poll for a possible Sub Team call this week: > http://doodle.com/728gsr7dg52x3fhb. > > As we’ll be recording it (as we have done for other Sub Team calls), > I’ll > need to check that we will also have Secretariat support once a > couple of > times seem likely, so hopefully everyone can fill in the poll at > their > earliest convenience (especially if tomorrow turns out to be a > popular > option!) > > Thanks and cheers > Mary > > Mary Wong > Senior Policy Director > Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN) > Telephone: +1 603 574 4889 > Email: mary.wong@icann.org<mailto:mary.wong@icann.org> > > > > From: Lindsay Hamilton-Reid > > <Lindsay.Hamilton-Reid@fasthosts.com<mailto:Lindsay.Hamilton-Reid@fast > hos > t > s.com> <mailto:Lindsay.Hamilton-Reid@fasthosts.com> > > Date: Tuesday, August 4, 2015 at 10:49 > To: Mary Wong <mary.wong@icann.org<mailto:mary.wong@icann.org>> > Cc: "gnso-ppsai2@icann.org<mailto:gnso-ppsai2@icann.org>" > <gnso-ppsai2@icann.org<mailto:gnso-ppsai2@icann.org>> > Subject: RE: [Gnso-ppsai2] Approach and coordination > > Hi all > > While we are on topic, we should arrange a call to discuss how to > deal > with these extra comments and have a general catch up. I am not even > sure who is convening this group but it would be good to decide how > we > move forward. > > Can we all give times when we would be available? Perhaps set up a > poll? > > Thanks > > Lindsay > > Lindsay Hamilton-Reid > Legal Counsel > Direct: +44 (0)1452 509145 | Mobile: 07720 091147 | > > Email:Lindsay.Hamilton-Reid@1and1.co.uk<mailto:Lindsay.Hamilton-Reid@1 > and > 1 > .co.uk> <mailto:Lindsay.Hamilton-Reid@1and1.co.uk> www.fasthosts.co.uk > <http://www.fasthosts.co.uk/> > <http://www.fasthosts.co.uk/>www.1and1.co.uk <http://www.1and1.co.uk/> > <http://www.1and1.co.uk/> > > [fh-1and1] > > > ? 2015 All rights reserved. Fasthosts is the trading name of > Fasthosts > Internet Limited. Company registration no. 03656438. Registered in > England and Wales. Registered office: Discovery House, 154 Southgate > Street, Gloucester, GL1 2EX. VAT no. 720821857. 1&1 is the trading > name > of 1&1 Internet Limited. Company registration no. 03953678. > Registered in > England and Wales. Registered office: Discovery House, 154 Southgate > Street, Gloucester, GL1 2EX. VAT no. 752539027. > > This message (including any attachments) is confidential and may be > legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you > should not > disclose, copy or use any part of it - please delete all copies > immediately and notify 1&1 on 0844 335 1211 or Fasthosts on 0333 0142 > 700. Any statements, opinions or information in this message are > provided > by the author, not on behalf of 1&1 and/or Fasthosts, unless > subsequently > confirmed by an individual who is authorised to represent 1&1 and/or > Fasthosts. > > > > From: > gnso-ppsai2-bounces@icann.org<mailto:gnso-ppsai2-bounces@icann.org> > [mailto:gnso-ppsai2-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Mary Wong > Sent: 03 August 2015 21:32 > Cc: gnso-ppsai2@icann.org<mailto:gnso-ppsai2@icann.org> > Subject: Re: [Gnso-ppsai2] Approach and coordination > > Hi Kiran and everyone, > > You can take a look at the current summary documents from Sub Team 1 > (for > Section 1.3.2): https://community.icann.org/x/zoZCAw. FWIW Sub Team 3 > (for Annex E) is adopting a similar approach of dividing its work > into > “buckets” based on the questions, and having different people sign > up for > each “bucket”. For now, Sub Team 3 is using the template provided by > staff, though re-organizing into their “buckets”. They also plan on > preparing some statistics (e.g. X number of people answered No, Y > number > of people answered No with this specific condition, etc.) for their > report to the WG. > > Please feel free to adopt whichever approach and documentation works > best > for this group. Staff will compile the final output from each Sub > Team > and organize them into a consistent format (which is why we hope the > staff-provided template will be useful!) > > Cheers > Mary > > Mary Wong > Senior Policy Director > Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN) > Telephone: +1 603 574 4889 > Email: mary.wong@icann.org<mailto:mary.wong@icann.org> > > > From: Kiran Malancharuvil > > <Kiran.Malancharuvil@markmonitor.com<mailto:Kiran.Malancharuvil@markmo > nit > o > r.com> <mailto:Kiran.Malancharuvil@markmonitor.com> > > Date: Monday, August 3, 2015 at 14:06 > To: Mary Wong <mary.wong@icann.org<mailto:mary.wong@icann.org>>, > Lindsay > Hamilton-Reid > > <Lindsay.Hamilton-Reid@fasthosts.com<mailto:Lindsay.Hamilton-Reid@fast > hos > t > s.com> <mailto:Lindsay.Hamilton-Reid@fasthosts.com> >, Terri Stumme > <terri.stumme@legitscript.com<mailto:terri.stumme@legitscript.com>> > Cc: "gnso-ppsai2@icann.org<mailto:gnso-ppsai2@icann.org>" > <gnso-ppsai2@icann.org<mailto:gnso-ppsai2@icann.org>> > Subject: RE: [Gnso-ppsai2] Approach and coordination > > Is there a template for preparing written summaries? I’m sorry for > lagging on this, but I am traveling this week. > > K > > From: Mary Wong [mailto:mary.wong@icann.org] > Sent: Monday, August 03, 2015 8:08 AM > To: Lindsay Hamilton-Reid; Terri Stumme > Cc: Kiran Malancharuvil; > gnso-ppsai2@icann.org<mailto:gnso-ppsai2@icann.org> > Subject: Re: [Gnso-ppsai2] Approach and coordination > > Thank you both; it is a lot of work so we really appreciate that in > addition to an oral update you may well have written summaries too. > Please send them to me for uploading to the WG/Sub Team wiki and (if > appropriate) to the WG’s AC room for the meeting tomorrow when you > are > ready; thanks so much! > > Cheers > Mary > > Mary Wong > Senior Policy Director > Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN) > Telephone: +1 603 574 4889 > Email: mary.wong@icann.org<mailto:mary.wong@icann.org> > > > From: Lindsay Hamilton-Reid > > <Lindsay.Hamilton-Reid@fasthosts.com<mailto:Lindsay.Hamilton-Reid@fast > hos > t > s.com> <mailto:Lindsay.Hamilton-Reid@fasthosts.com> > > Date: Monday, August 3, 2015 at 10:35 > To: Mary Wong <mary.wong@icann.org<mailto:mary.wong@icann.org>>, > Terri > Stumme > <terri.stumme@legitscript.com<mailto:terri.stumme@legitscript.com>> > Cc: Kiran Malancharuvil > > <Kiran.Malancharuvil@markmonitor.com<mailto:Kiran.Malancharuvil@markmo > nit > o > r.com> <mailto:Kiran.Malancharuvil@markmonitor.com> >, > "gnso-ppsai2@icann.org<mailto:gnso-ppsai2@icann.org>" > <gnso-ppsai2@icann.org<mailto:gnso-ppsai2@icann.org>> > Subject: RE: [Gnso-ppsai2] Approach and coordination > > Hi Mary > > I should be ready to discuss the comments verbally, although I also > hope > to have the document up and running too. > > Many thanks > > Lindsay > > Lindsay Hamilton-Reid > Legal Counsel > Direct: +44 (0)1452 509145 | Mobile: 07720 091147 | > > Email:Lindsay.Hamilton-Reid@1and1.co.uk<mailto:Lindsay.Hamilton-Reid@1 > and > 1 > .co.uk> <mailto:Lindsay.Hamilton-Reid@1and1.co.uk> www.fasthosts.co.uk > <http://www.fasthosts.co.uk/> > <http://www.fasthosts.co.uk/>www.1and1.co.uk <http://www.1and1.co.uk/> > <http://www.1and1.co.uk/> > > [fh-1and1] > > > ? 2015 All rights reserved. Fasthosts is the trading name of > Fasthosts > Internet Limited. Company registration no. 03656438. Registered in > England and Wales. Registered office: Discovery House, 154 Southgate > Street, Gloucester, GL1 2EX. VAT no. 720821857. 1&1 is the trading > name > of 1&1 Internet Limited. Company registration no. 03953678. > Registered in > England and Wales. Registered office: Discovery House, 154 Southgate > Street, Gloucester, GL1 2EX. VAT no. 752539027. > > This message (including any attachments) is confidential and may be > legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you > should not > disclose, copy or use any part of it - please delete all copies > immediately and notify 1&1 on 0844 335 1211 or Fasthosts on 0333 0142 > 700. Any statements, opinions or information in this message are > provided > by the author, not on behalf of 1&1 and/or Fasthosts, unless > subsequently > confirmed by an individual who is authorised to represent 1&1 and/or > Fasthosts. > > > > From: Mary Wong [mailto:mary.wong@icann.org] > Sent: 03 August 2015 14:54 > To: Lindsay Hamilton-Reid > > <Lindsay.Hamilton-Reid@fasthosts.com<mailto:Lindsay.Hamilton-Reid@fast > hos > t > s.com> <mailto:Lindsay.Hamilton-Reid@fasthosts.com> >; Terri Stumme > <terri.stumme@legitscript.com<mailto:terri.stumme@legitscript.com>> > Cc: Kiran Malancharuvil > > <Kiran.Malancharuvil@markmonitor.com<mailto:Kiran.Malancharuvil@markmo > nit > o > r.com> <mailto:Kiran.Malancharuvil@markmonitor.com> >; > gnso-ppsai2@icann.org<mailto:gnso-ppsai2@icann.org> > Subject: Re: [Gnso-ppsai2] Approach and coordination > > Hello everyone thanks, Terri and Lindsay, for volunteering to take > on > Question 1 (which does have the most and rather voluminous > comments). If > it’s not asking too much, do you think you’ll be in a position to > give a > brief update (even orally) to the WG on the call tomorrow? > > Assuming Terri and Lindsay are fine with reviewing Question 1 as a > team > of two, perhaps the next step would be for this Sub Team to discuss > their > findings/summaries (following the WG call tomorrow), and for others > to do > the same type of review/summary for the remaining questions? Again, > please let me know if you will be needing any assistance from staff > in > this process. > > Thanks and cheers > Mary > > Mary Wong > Senior Policy Director > Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN) > Telephone: +1 603 574 4889 > Email: mary.wong@icann.org<mailto:mary.wong@icann.org> > > > From: Lindsay Hamilton-Reid > > <Lindsay.Hamilton-Reid@fasthosts.com<mailto:Lindsay.Hamilton-Reid@fast > hos > t > s.com> <mailto:Lindsay.Hamilton-Reid@fasthosts.com> > > Date: Monday, August 3, 2015 at 09:45 > To: Terri Stumme > <terri.stumme@legitscript.com<mailto:terri.stumme@legitscript.com>> > Cc: Kiran Malancharuvil > > <Kiran.Malancharuvil@markmonitor.com<mailto:Kiran.Malancharuvil@markmo > nit > o > r.com> <mailto:Kiran.Malancharuvil@markmonitor.com> >, Mary Wong > <mary.wong@icann.org<mailto:mary.wong@icann.org>>, > "gnso-ppsai2@icann.org<mailto:gnso-ppsai2@icann.org>" > <gnso-ppsai2@icann.org<mailto:gnso-ppsai2@icann.org>> > Subject: RE: [Gnso-ppsai2] Approach and coordination > > Hi Terri > > Well I have not started yet so I will take comments 40 to 87 then on > question 1. As the comments have already been sorted into the > relevant > questions, I will summarise the responses in a word document then. > > Many thanks > > Lindsay > > Lindsay Hamilton-Reid > Legal Counsel > Direct: +44 (0)1452 509145 | Mobile: 07720 091147 | > > Email:Lindsay.Hamilton-Reid@1and1.co.uk<mailto:Lindsay.Hamilton-Reid@1 > and > 1 > .co.uk> <mailto:Lindsay.Hamilton-Reid@1and1.co.uk> www.fasthosts.co.uk > <http://www.fasthosts.co.uk/> > <http://www.fasthosts.co.uk/>www.1and1.co.uk <http://www.1and1.co.uk/> > <http://www.1and1.co.uk/> > > [fh-1and1] > > > ? 2015 All rights reserved. Fasthosts is the trading name of > Fasthosts > Internet Limited. Company registration no. 03656438. Registered in > England and Wales. Registered office: Discovery House, 154 Southgate > Street, Gloucester, GL1 2EX. VAT no. 720821857. 1&1 is the trading > name > of 1&1 Internet Limited. Company registration no. 03953678. > Registered in > England and Wales. Registered office: Discovery House, 154 Southgate > Street, Gloucester, GL1 2EX. VAT no. 752539027. > > This message (including any attachments) is confidential and may be > legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you > should not > disclose, copy or use any part of it - please delete all copies > immediately and notify 1&1 on 0844 335 1211 or Fasthosts on 0333 0142 > 700. Any statements, opinions or information in this message are > provided > by the author, not on behalf of 1&1 and/or Fasthosts, unless > subsequently > confirmed by an individual who is authorised to represent 1&1 and/or > Fasthosts. > > > > From: Terri Stumme [mailto:terri.stumme@legitscript.com] > Sent: 03 August 2015 14:27 > To: Lindsay Hamilton-Reid > > <Lindsay.Hamilton-Reid@fasthosts.com<mailto:Lindsay.Hamilton-Reid@fast > hos > t > s.com> <mailto:Lindsay.Hamilton-Reid@fasthosts.com> > > Cc: Kiran Malancharuvil > > <Kiran.Malancharuvil@markmonitor.com<mailto:Kiran.Malancharuvil@markmo > nit > o > r.com> <mailto:Kiran.Malancharuvil@markmonitor.com> >; Mary Wong > <mary.wong@icann.org<mailto:mary.wong@icann.org>>; > gnso-ppsai2@icann.org<mailto:gnso-ppsai2@icann.org> > Subject: Re: [Gnso-ppsai2] Approach and coordination > > I have actually started going through question 1, and it is taking > longer > than I anticipated. I'm sorting the responses and have made it to > response #15. > > Should I continue on this path so as to complete by tomorrow's call? > > On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 8:30 AM, Lindsay Hamilton-Reid > > <Lindsay.Hamilton-Reid@fasthosts.com<mailto:Lindsay.Hamilton-Reid@fast > hos > t > s.com> <mailto:Lindsay.Hamilton-Reid@fasthosts.com> > wrote: > > Hi Kiran > > > > I am happy to look at question 1 today and summarise but as I have no > idea what anyone else is doing, I could take on a different > question. I > should have an initial summary by the call tomorrow but this is > going to > take a lot more work. What about everyone else? What has been done > so > far? > > > > Many thanks > > > > Lindsay > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: > gnso-ppsai2-bounces@icann.org<mailto:gnso-ppsai2-bounces@icann.org> > > [mailto:gnso-ppsai2-bounces@icann.org<mailto:gnso-ppsai2-bounces@icann > .or > g > ] On Behalf Of Kiran Malancharuvil > Sent: 31 July 2015 22:38 > To: Mary Wong <mary.wong@icann.org<mailto:mary.wong@icann.org>> > Cc: gnso-ppsai2@icann.org<mailto:gnso-ppsai2@icann.org> > Subject: Re: [Gnso-ppsai2] Approach and coordination > > > > Dear All, > > > > It's my opinion that we need more time to explore the comments and > the > implications on permissible use. > > > > Has anyone started the work on this? > > > > Kiran > > > > Kiran Malancharuvil > > Policy Counselor > > MarkMonitor > > 415-419-9138<tel:415-419-9138> (m) > > > > Sent from my mobile, please excuse any typos. > > > > On Jul 31, 2015, at 1:38 PM, Mary Wong > <mary.wong@icann.org<mailto:mary.wong@icann.org>> wrote: > Hello everyone, at the risk of being pesky I thought I’d change the > subject title in case you didn’t see my earlier email (below) > suggesting a possible approach to the work of this Sub Team. Please > accept my apologies if you’ve already begun your work and so don’t > need > this reminder! > If you should need to do a Sub Team call, especially if you are > scheduling one before the next WG meeting on Tuesday, staff would > greatly appreciate your letting us know as soon as possible since we > will need to set up the recording and (if you need one) the AC room. > Thanks again, and have a great weekend, > Mary > Mary Wong > Senior Policy Director > Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN) > Telephone: +1 603 574 4889<tel:%2B1%20603%20574%204889> > Email: mary.wong@icann.org<mailto:mary.wong@icann.org> > -----Original Message----- > From: Mary Wong <mary.wong@icann.org<mailto:mary.wong@icann.org>> > Date: Thursday, July 30, 2015 at 19:37 > To: "gnso-ppsai2@icann.org<mailto:gnso-ppsai2@icann.org>" > <gnso-ppsai2@icann.org<mailto:gnso-ppsai2@icann.org>> > Subject: Re: [Gnso-ppsai2] testing > Loud and clear, Stephanie - thanks, and welcome, everyone, to Sub > Team 2 (dealing with Section 1.3.3 of the WG Initial Report)! > It will be much appreciated if you can move all future email > discussions to this mailing list. > Please note also that I have noticed - in going over the comments > received again - that one comment relevant to your topic seems to > have been edited over in my formatting of the original Word > document. > This is a comment from Web.com <http://web.com/> <http://Web.com> > <http://web.com/> , which I have now > added > as ROW 85 on > page 30. No other changes have been made to the original document > circulated previously. > I¹ll update the wiki page accordingly. > Given the extensive nature of the comments (especially for the more > general Question 1) and the fact that there are 7 members of this > Sub > Team, would it be a good idea for this Sub Team to divide the work > such that 3 people (for instance) can do the first sweep through > Question 1 (perhaps taking 25-30 comments each), 2 take on > Question 2 > (dividing the comments in half), 1 person do Question 3 and the > last > person do the remaining general comments? > This could be the first phase, and each person could use the same > format to ensure consistency - whether that be the template > provided > or something like what Sub Team 1 (for Section 1.3.2) is doing, per > this week¹s report. > Following this initial phase, the Sub Team can then come together > (having read one another¹s submissions) to agree on recommendations > to be made by the Sub Team as a whole to the WG. > If this approach makes sense, perhaps we can take volunteers for > each > ³sub part² so that there will be something to report back to the > full > WG with this coming Tuesday? > Thanks and cheers > Mary > Mary Wong > Senior Policy Director > Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN) > Telephone: +1 603 574 4889<tel:%2B1%20603%20574%204889> > Email: mary.wong@icann.org<mailto:mary.wong@icann.org> > -----Original Message----- > From: > > <gnso-ppsai2-bounces@icann.org<mailto:gnso-ppsai2-bounces@icann.org> > on behalf of Stephanie Perrin > > <stephanie.perrin@mail.utoronto.ca<mailto:stephanie.perrin@mail.utor > ont > o > .ca> <mailto:stephanie.perrin@mail.utoronto.ca> > > Date: Thursday, July 30, 2015 at 19:14 > To: "gnso-ppsai2@icann.org<mailto:gnso-ppsai2@icann.org>" > <gnso-ppsai2@icann.org<mailto:gnso-ppsai2@icann.org>> > Subject: [Gnso-ppsai2] testing > testing > SP > _______________________________________________ > Gnso-ppsai2 mailing list > Gnso-ppsai2@icann.org<mailto:Gnso-ppsai2@icann.org>https://mm.icann.org/ > mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai2 > _______________________________________________ > Gnso-ppsai2 mailing list > Gnso-ppsai2@icann.org<mailto:Gnso-ppsai2@icann.org>https://mm.icann.org/ > mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai2 > _______________________________________________ > > Gnso-ppsai2 mailing list > > Gnso-ppsai2@icann.org<mailto:Gnso-ppsai2@icann.org>https://mm.icann.org/ > mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai2 > > _______________________________________________ > Gnso-ppsai2 mailing list > Gnso-ppsai2@icann.org<mailto:Gnso-ppsai2@icann.org>https://mm.icann.org/ > mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai2 > > > > -- > Terri Stumme > Intelligence Analyst > <image001.jpg> > _______________________________________________ > Gnso-ppsai2 mailing list > Gnso-ppsai2@icann.org<mailto:Gnso-ppsai2@icann.org>https://mm.icann.org/ > mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai2 > _______________________________________________ > Gnso-ppsai2 mailing list > Gnso-ppsai2@icann.orghttps://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai2 > _______________________________________________ > Gnso-ppsai2 mailing list > Gnso-ppsai2@icann.orghttps://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai2 > _______________________________________________ > Gnso-ppsai2 mailing list > Gnso-ppsai2@icann.orghttps://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai2 > > > _______________________________________________ > Gnso-ppsai2 mailing list > Gnso-ppsai2@icann.orghttps://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai2 > > _______________________________________________ > Gnso-ppsai2 mailing list > Gnso-ppsai2@icann.org > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai2
Gnso-ppsai2 mailing list Gnso-ppsai2@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai2
Gnso-ppsai2 mailing list Gnso-ppsai2@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai2