Sadly, I have not received the invitations for this call or the last, could someone please forward the adobe link....I dont want to waste time hacking around guessing. Stephanie On 2015-08-31 11:44, Mary Wong wrote:
Hello everyone,
As you may have seen from the Public Comment Review Tool compiled for this Sub Team, three commenters specifically highlighted the EU E-Commerce Directive (the BC, Unifab and John Nagle/Sitetruth). There may have been other references to it in relation to other recommendations or questions, but as I recall these are the three that were included in the Tool as directly addressing this Sub Team’s topic.
I should also note that each Sub Team was free to select the form of report/summary that they wished to use to present their findings and reports; as such, while some Sub Teams agreed to use a similar format, there was not a standard form prescribed. The documents you now see on this Sub Team’s wiki page are therefore what was prepared, circulated and discussed between 4 August and now.
Cheers Mary
Mary Wong Senior Policy Director Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN) Telephone: +1 603 574 4889 Email: mary.wong@icann.org
From: <gnso-ppsai2-bounces@icann.org <mailto:gnso-ppsai2-bounces@icann.org>> on behalf of Stephanie Perrin <stephanie.perrin@mail.utoronto.ca <mailto:stephanie.perrin@mail.utoronto.ca>> Date: Monday, August 31, 2015 at 23:32 To: "gnso-ppsai2@icann.org <mailto:gnso-ppsai2@icann.org>" <gnso-ppsai2@icann.org <mailto:gnso-ppsai2@icann.org>> Subject: Re: [Gnso-ppsai2] concerns question 2 summary
Indeed, if we are going to use the EU directive on electronic commerce, why not the directive on data protection? they go together... cheers stephanie
On 2015-08-31 11:21, Kathy Kleiman wrote:
Hi All, I've been reading the Question 2 summary and I don't understand it. With so few commenters, why aren't individual points identified with individual commenters? That is the practice done in the other subteams and for transparency purposes.
For example who said we should use the EU Directive on Electronic Commerce? The definition completely contradicts a number of noncommercial protection provisions under US law - including that holding a garage sale in front of your house does not make your house commercial, and selling a bumper sticker for the Democratic National Committee does not make the DNC commercial either.
Linking comments to commenters should be an easy step.
Best, Kathy
:
Thanks to all who responded – by way of this email I’m requesting that the GNSO Secretariat set up the call-in details and AC room. Please watch your inboxes for the information they’ll send around.
Cheers Mary
Mary Wong Senior Policy Director Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN) Telephone: +1 603 574 4889 Email: mary.wong@icann.org
From: "Prosser, Susan" <susan@domaintools.com <mailto:susan@domaintools.com>> Date: Monday, August 31, 2015 at 00:57 To: Terri Stumme <terri.stumme@legitscript.com> Cc: Mary Wong <mary.wong@icann.org>, "gnso-ppsai2@icann.org <mailto:gnso-ppsai2@icann.org>" <gnso-ppsai2@icann.org <mailto:gnso-ppsai2@icann.org>> Subject: Re: [Gnso-ppsai2] PPSAI Sub Team 2 - status update
I can make that work for a call tomorrow.
~~~~ Susan Prosser VP, Client Services DomainTools, LLC
T: (206) 838-9060 E: susan@domaintools.com PGP: A2C4D2A4
On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 8:46 PM, Terri Stumme <terri.stumme@legitscript.com <mailto:terri.stumme@legitscript.com>> wrote:
I can be available for a call on Monday.
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 2:27 PM, Mary Wong <mary.wong@icann.org <mailto:mary.wong@icann.org>> wrote:
Thanks, Lindsay!
All - again, as the subteam is due to provide its report to the full WG this coming Tuesday 1 September, shall we do a call on Monday to discuss the questions/topics set out below?
Is anyone NOT able to do a 1600 UTC call on Monday?
Thanks! Mary
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 27, 2015, at 16:02, Lindsay Hamilton-Reid <Lindsay.Hamilton-Reid@fasthosts.com> wrote:
Hi Mary
Many thanks for this. I can do a call on the Monday.
Kind regards
Lindsay
Sent from my iPhone
On 27 Aug 2015, at 08:56, Mary Wong <mary.wong@icann.org> wrote:
Hello again everyone,
Attached please find proposed language from Kiran and Christian following the last Sub Team call, intended to address the comments from the Save Domain Privacy and Respect Our Privacy petition and emails. As agreed on the Sub Team call, the finalized language will be inserted into the Sub Team’s report to the full WG on Question 1.
If we can get consensus on Question 1 via email, perhaps the call I’d proposed below can then focus on Questions 2 and 3 as well as any notes anyone may have on the remaining comments that I’d previously grouped into a Question 4? Please let me know if that will work and if you think we should convene a call either on Friday or Monday.
Thanks and cheers Mary
Mary Wong Senior Policy Director Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN) Telephone: +1 603 574 4889 <tel:%2B1%20603%20574%204889> Email: mary.wong@icann.org
From: Mary Wong <mary.wong@icann.org> Date: Thursday, August 27, 2015 at 08:48 To: <gnso-ppsai2@icann.org> Subject: PPSAI Sub Team 2 - status update
Hello everyone,
As this Sub Team is due to make its next/final report to the full WG next week (1 September), I thought I’d write to follow up on the “action items” noted after the last call we did on 12 August (below).
On Question 1, I believe that Christian and Kiran will send proposed language to this group for your review and, hopefully consensus.
For Questions 2 & 3, it was agreed that the Sub Team as a whole would likely need to further discuss its conclusions/recommendations. I will note here also that we have not yet discussed Question 4, though in that regard perhaps I can suggest that staff take a stab at summarizing them for your review. This suggestion is based on the fact that these represent a collection of comments that relate generally to our topic rather than specific responses to Questions 1, 2 or 3.
As such, would it make sense for the Sub Team to try to do a call to go over the above, perhaps on Friday 28 August or Monday 31 August, presuming that everyone will have had a chance to send and/or read the latest documents by then?
Thanks and cheers Mary
Mary Wong Senior Policy Director Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN) Telephone: +1 603 574 4889 <tel:%2B1%20603%20574%204889> Email: mary.wong@icann.org
From: Mary Wong <mary.wong@icann.org> Date: Saturday, August 15, 2015 at 04:53 To: <gnso-ppsai2@icann.org> Subject: Follow up from Sub Team call today
Hello Sub Team members,
For the benefit of those who could not join us on the Sub Team call earlier today and to document next steps for this group, here are the “action items” that were agreed on by those on the call:
_Approach to the Save Domain Privacy and Respect Our Privacy petition, comments and statements_:
* Kiran and Christian will work on draft suggested language for the Sub Team in respect of Question 1. While everyone agreed that these comments show a huge wave of support for user privacy to be respected and against restricting privacy services based on the word “commercial” used as a distinction, there was no agreement that this general support is totally dispositive of the various specific issues and options that had been raised by the Working Group in our Initial Report. * ADDITIONAL NOTE: I went and prepared a general summary on the additional comments that accompanied the Save Domain Privacy petition i.e. the additional comments that the organizers sent in, containing specific comments from many of the signatories. I’ll circulate this separately, in the hope that this summary will be helpful as you finalize the Sub Team’s recommendations.
_Treating Question 1 as a “threshold” question to Questions 2 and 3_:
* It was agreed that this may not be possible, since some comments noted that the answer to Question 1 might depend on the answer to Question 2. It was suggested that Question 2 might in fact be a more appropriate “threshold” question, although that was not how it was framed in the Initial Report.
_Next steps_:
* Sub Team to discuss draft language from Kiran and Christian (next week?) * Sub Team to continue review of the summary analysis to Questions 1 & 2, and possibly also 3 as well
Please note that the WG Work Plan currently has this Sub Team scheduled to provide its final recommended actions on Section 1.3.3 to the full WG on *1 September* (i.e. about two and a half weeks from now). Assuming you think that is a realistic deadline, this would seem to call for at least one call late next week or early the following week, prior to which hopefully you will have had the chance to review all the documents prepared by Lindsay and Terri, and the forthcoming proposed language from Kiran and Christian.
Thanks and cheers Mary
Mary Wong Senior Policy Director Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN) Telephone: +1 603 574 4889 <tel:%2B1%20603%20574%204889> Email: mary.wong@icann.org
<Sub Team 2 - proposed language on SDP & ROP comments - updated 27 August.docx> _______________________________________________ Gnso-ppsai2 mailing list Gnso-ppsai2@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai2
_______________________________________________ Gnso-ppsai2 mailing list Gnso-ppsai2@icann.org <mailto:Gnso-ppsai2@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai2
-- /Terri Stumme/ /Intelligence Analyst/
_______________________________________________ Gnso-ppsai2 mailing list Gnso-ppsai2@icann.org <mailto:Gnso-ppsai2@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai2
_______________________________________________ Gnso-ppsai2 mailing list Gnso-ppsai2@icann.orghttps://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai2
_______________________________________________ Gnso-ppsai2 mailing list Gnso-ppsai2@icann.orghttps://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai2
_______________________________________________ Gnso-ppsai2 mailing list Gnso-ppsai2@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai2