September 2015 - Gnso-ppsai4

Combined templates
by Kathy Kleiman Sept. 19, 2015

Sept. 19, 2015

Hi All, Here is the combined template, comments 1-30 and 46-76. Tx for all your work! I am working on a draft summary now... Best, Kathy

1 0

Re: [Gnso-ppsai4] My template
by Kathy Kleiman Sept. 19, 2015

Sept. 19, 2015

Tx so much, Victoria. All, I am putting together a combination template of all of our individual templates and will circulate. I'll also take a first stab at a summary documentary and will circulate also for comments and edits. Stephanie, I know much is taking place in your household. Will it be possible to have your summary? Tx, Kathy : > Here is my first run through the comments 1-15. I may have amendments later. > > -----Original Message----- > From: gnso-ppsai4-bounces(a)icann.org [mailto:gnso-ppsai4-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Kathy Kleiman > Sent: Friday, September 18, 2015 1:11 PM > To: gnso-ppsai4(a)icann.org > Subject: [Gnso-ppsai4] My template > > Hi All, > Here is my template for comments 61-76, and I have also received Paul's template. If you need any assistance, please let me know sooner rather than later (now would be good) as I have a bit of time in the office today to help. > > Best, > Kathy

1 0

My template
by Kathy Kleiman Sept. 18, 2015

Sept. 18, 2015

Hi All, Here is my template for comments 61-76, and I have also received Paul's template. If you need any assistance, please let me know sooner rather than later (now would be good) as I have a bit of time in the office today to help. Best, Kathy

1 0

Subteam 4 - Handing out comments
by Kathy Kleiman Sept. 18, 2015

Sept. 18, 2015

Hi Victoria, James, Stephanie and Paul, Tx for taking on the mantle of comment review! I have divided up the comments//in #2 below and here are two documents to assist us with our work: 1) PART 4: created by Staff, this is 76 substantive comments that Staff identified that seem to contain ideas, concerns and suggestions not yet reflected in the work of subteams 1, 2 and 3. Staff has excerpted comments that they think add new ideas to our process. But Paul and I asked Mary, and she provided links to the full comments themselves (tx you, Mary!) This is to allow you to check the comment in full, in context, where you may find additional ideas, suggestions and concerns to add to your template. PART 4 at: */https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=54691542&preview=/54691542/56135563/PCRT%20Part%204%20-%20updated%2014%20Sept.docx/* 2) SUBTEAM 4 TEMPLATE: There is a blank template attached which is a slight variation of the templates of subteams 1-3. It has some of the same fields plus additional fields to capture and categorize the new ideas submitted to the WG. Hopefully, the categories will be helpful for us and the WG. Category A, for example, is comments re: Law Enforcement access to Customer data (e.g, whether it should track Annex E (private persons access) or be different. Category b is for comments that ask the WG to create additional processes to oversee and monitor the accreditation program once created. Etc. There are six other specific categories (A-F) and one catch-all category for anything we've forgotten ( Category G). I've divided the comments into six parts -- using the 76 comments from "Part 4" in #1. a) Victoria - comments 1-15 in PART 4, Section I(a) b) James - comments 16-30 (same) c) Stephanie - comments 31-45 (same) d) Paul - comments 46-60 (same) e) Kathy - comments 61-76 (same) ** _Please edit the first column of your template document attached to a) have your name on it and b) renumber column 1, titled "#", to reflect Your Comment Numbers._** (currently listed as 1-15). /If you need any assistance in understanding categories or reading comments you can't get to, please let me know. For the first time in months, I have a little extra time this week.// / /*We need to report to the WG on Tuesday, so if you could have your templates back by _this __Friday afternoon_, Paul and I can put them together into a report. **Should we try to have a call on Friday afternoon too? */* * /Best, Kathy (working with Paul) Link: To PART 4 (with 76 comments summarized, and links to them) -- https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=54691542&preview=/… Attached: SUBTEAM 4 TEMPLATE / On 9/16/2015 11:46 AM, Victoria Sheckler wrote: > > Yes I can do some > > *From:*gnso-ppsai4-bounces@icann.org > [mailto:gnso-ppsai4-bounces@icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Kathy Kleiman > *Sent:* Wednesday, September 16, 2015 7:13 AM > *To:* gnso-ppsai4(a)icann.org > *Subject:* [Gnso-ppsai4] Subteam's 4 moment - and a timely question > > Hi All, > It's Subteam 4's time to hit the books (the comments really) and > report back. Our reporting date is this Tuesday and we have a lot of > work to do - but not as much as you might think. there are about 76 > comments in the "no comment left behind" category and we want to > divide them up. /Who has some time this week? Who can take on the > review of a subset of comments? > > /Please let me know as soon as possible (by 1pm Eastern, if possible) > and we will divvy up the 76 comments among the people who respond. We > have some great tools that Mary has created -- including easy links, > templates and summaries. I'll send those out at 1pm too. > > But please let us know if you can devote a few hours to this on or > before the end of the week - your time is much appreciated! > Best, > Kathy and Paul >

5 11

CALL ON MONDAY for Sub Team 4
by Mary Wong Sept. 17, 2015

Sept. 17, 2015

Hello all, By way of this note I¹m asking the GNSO Secretariat to arrange the usual call-in and AC details for the proposed Sub Team 4 call on Monday 21 September at 1500 UTC (11 a.m. US Eastern time). Thanks and cheers Mary Mary Wong Senior Policy Director Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN) Telephone: +1 603 574 4889 Email: mary.wong(a)icann.org From: <gnso-ppsai4-bounces(a)icann.org> on behalf of Kathy Kleiman <kathy(a)kathykleiman.com> Date: Thursday, September 17, 2015 at 05:02 To: "McGrady, Paul D." <PMcGrady(a)winston.com> Cc: "gnso-ppsai4(a)icann.org" <gnso-ppsai4(a)icann.org> Subject: Re: [Gnso-ppsai4] Subteam 4 - Handing out comments > Sure, Paul! How's Monday at 11am Eastern, All? If not, please suggest a good > time. > > I would still like to keep a deadline of Friday for comment template > summaries. Over the weekend, I'll put them together so that we have a document > to review on Monday - and hopefully present on Tuesday! Does that make work? > > Enjoy Vienna, > Kathy > > On 9/16/2015 4:48 PM, James Gannon wrote: >> If it works for the group I would be ok for either day. >> >> -j >> >>> On 16 Sep 2015, at 21:40, McGrady, Paul D. <PMcGrady(a)winston.com> wrote: >>> >>> Thanks Kathy! >>> >>> Any chance we could have the team call on Monday instead? I am in Vienna >>> this week and pretty fully booked already for Friday. If not, please >>> proceed without me. I will get started on my comment set! >>> >>> Best, >>> Paul >>> >>> >>> >>> From: <mailto:gnso-ppsai4-bounces@icann.org> gnso-ppsai4-bounces(a)icann.org >>> [ <mailto:gnso-ppsai4-bounces@icann.org> >>> mailto:gnso-ppsai4-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of James Gannon >>> Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2015 1:49 PM >>> To: Kathy Kleiman >>> Cc: <mailto:gnso-ppsai4@icann.org> gnso-ppsai4(a)icann.org; Victoria Sheckler >>> Subject: Re: [Gnso-ppsai4] Subteam 4 - Handing out comments >>> >>> Hey Kathy I agree I think we can get started as we have a limited time >>> window to get this work completed, much thanks to you and Paul for >>> shepherding us through this critical piece of work and Mary and staff for >>> your assistance! >>> >>> -James >>> >>> >>>> On 16 Sep 2015, at 19:39, Kathy Kleiman < <mailto:kathy@KATHYKLEIMAN.COM> >>>> kathy(a)KATHYKLEIMAN.COM> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Mary, >>>> I have not heard back from Amr and Frank, and so I am assuming they are >>>> busy. In the interest of moving forward, let's work with those who >>>> responded and if they have time, great! >>>> >>>> Re: categories, we took yours and revised them to more easily reflect >>>> certain patterns we are seeing in various comments we scanned. It is >>>> inclusive: yours plus a few others. >>>> >>>> Unless you have any further objections, I recommend we move forward -- with >>>> tx again to all who volunteered today! >>>> Best, >>>> Kathy >>>> >>>> >>>> On 9/16/2015 2:17 PM, Mary Wong wrote: >>>>> Thanks, Kathy and everyone just two points of clarification for your >>>>> information as you all begin the review exercise: >>>>> >>>>> (1) There are actually seven WG participants who volunteered for this Sub >>>>> Team; so in addition to Kathy, Paul, Vicky, James and Stephanie there is >>>>> also Amr Elsadr and Frank Michlick (who should both be subscribed to this >>>>> PPSAI-4 mailing list as well). >>>>> >>>>> (2) Kathy I notice that your template document differs from the one >>>>> staff had prepared and distributed after the Sub Team call in mid-August. >>>>> Where that had five categories (or ³buckets²) based on the gist of the >>>>> discussion during the call, the current template now has seven. Obviously, >>>>> staff is not saying that the earlier template is better in any way, but we >>>>> do want to caution against trying to fill in a template that has more >>>>> rather than fewer categories. Moreover, it may not be clear what the >>>>> dividing lines might be for instance, what would the new category >>>>> labeled ³Issues involving Law Enforcement² cover that is not within the >>>>> scope of, say, Sub Team 1? Would it be easier and less confusing for >>>>> whoever comes across such a comment in their assignments to simply >>>>> highlight it for forwarding to Sub Team 1? >>>>> >>>>> (3) As noted on the call with the WG co-chairs last Friday, there is >>>>> another group of comments in Part 4 of the Public Comment Review Tool that >>>>> does not individually list separate comments (as these number in the >>>>> hundreds, if not thousands). Rather, they are all summarized into several >>>>> categories of concerns surrounding largely a loss of privacy. The Sub Team >>>>> was to also look at these categories, to see if any of them required >>>>> further discussion by the WG. How would the Sub Team wish to approach this >>>>> other exercise? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks and cheers >>>>> Mary >>>>> >>>>> Mary Wong >>>>> Senior Policy Director >>>>> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN) >>>>> Telephone: +1 603 574 4889 >>>>> Email: <mailto:mary.wong@icann.org> mary.wong(a)icann.org >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> From: < <mailto:gnso-ppsai4-bounces@icann.org> >>>>> gnso-ppsai4-bounces(a)icann.org> on behalf of Kathy Kleiman < >>>>> <mailto:kathy@kathykleiman.com> kathy(a)kathykleiman.com> >>>>> Date: Thursday, September 17, 2015 at 01:32 >>>>> To: Victoria Sheckler <vsheckler(a)riaa.com <mailto:vsheckler@riaa.com> >, >>>>> "gnso-ppsai4(a)icann.org <mailto:gnso-ppsai4@icann.org> " >>>>> <gnso-ppsai4(a)icann.org <mailto:gnso-ppsai4@icann.org> > >>>>> Subject: [Gnso-ppsai4] Subteam 4 - Handing out comments >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Victoria, James, Stephanie and Paul, >>>>>> Tx for taking on the mantle of comment review! I have divided up the >>>>>> commentsin #2 below and here are two documents to assist us with our >>>>>> work: >>>>>> >>>>>> 1) PART 4: created by Staff, this is 76 substantive comments that Staff >>>>>> identified that seem to contain ideas, concerns and suggestions not yet >>>>>> reflected in the work of subteams 1, 2 and 3. Staff has excerpted >>>>>> comments that they think add new ideas to our process. But Paul and I >>>>>> asked Mary, and she provided links to the full comments themselves (tx >>>>>> you, Mary!) This is to allow you to check the comment in full, in >>>>>> context, where you may find additional ideas, suggestions and concerns to >>>>>> add to your template. >>>>>> >>>>>> PART 4 at: >>>>>> <https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=54691542&previe >>>>>> w=/54691542/56135563/PCRT%20Part%204%20-%20updated%2014%20Sept.docx> >>>>>> https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=54691542&preview >>>>>> =/54691542/56135563/PCRT%20Part%204%20-%20updated%2014%20Sept.docx >>>>>> >>>>>> 2) SUBTEAM 4 TEMPLATE: There is a blank template attached which is a >>>>>> slight variation of the templates of subteams 1-3. It has some of the >>>>>> same fields plus additional fields to capture and categorize the new >>>>>> ideas submitted to the WG. Hopefully, the categories will be helpful for >>>>>> us and the WG. Category A, for example, is comments re: Law Enforcement >>>>>> access to Customer data (e.g, whether it should track Annex E (private >>>>>> persons access) or be different. Category b is for comments that ask the >>>>>> WG to create additional processes to oversee and monitor the >>>>>> accreditation program once created. Etc. >>>>>> >>>>>> There are six other specific categories (A-F) and one catch-all category >>>>>> for anything we've forgotten ( Category G). >>>>>> >>>>>> I've divided the comments into six parts -- using the 76 comments from >>>>>> "Part 4" in #1. >>>>>> a) Victoria - comments 1-15 in PART 4, Section I(a) >>>>>> b) James - comments 16-30 (same) >>>>>> c) Stephanie - comments 31-45 (same) >>>>>> d) Paul - comments 46-60 (same) >>>>>> e) Kathy - comments 61-76 (same) >>>>>> >>>>>> ** Please edit the first column of your template document attached to a) >>>>>> have your name on it and b) renumber column 1, titled "#", to reflect >>>>>> Your Comment Numbers.** (currently listed as 1-15). If you need any >>>>>> assistance in understanding categories or reading comments you can't get >>>>>> to, please let me know. For the first time in months, I have a little >>>>>> extra time this week. >>>>>> >>>>>> We need to report to the WG on Tuesday, so if you could have your >>>>>> templates back by this Friday afternoon, Paul and I can put them together >>>>>> into a report. Should we try to have a call on Friday afternoon too? >>>>>> >>>>>> Best, >>>>>> Kathy (working with Paul) >>>>>> >>>>>> Link: To PART 4 (with 76 comments summarized, and links to them) -- >>>>>> <https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=54691542&previe >>>>>> w=/54691542/56135563/PCRT%20Part%204%20-%20updated%2014%20Sept.docx> >>>>>> https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=54691542&preview >>>>>> =/54691542/56135563/PCRT%20Part%204%20-%20updated%2014%20Sept.docx >>>>>> Attached: SUBTEAM 4 TEMPLATE >>>>>> >>>>>> On 9/16/2015 11:46 AM, Victoria Sheckler wrote: >>>>>>> Yes I can do some >>>>>>> >>>>>>> From: <mailto:gnso-ppsai4-bounces@icann.org> >>>>>>> gnso-ppsai4-bounces(a)icann.org [mailto:gnso-ppsai4-bounces@icann.org >>>>>>> <mailto:gnso-ppsai4-bounces@icann.org> ] On Behalf Of Kathy Kleiman >>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2015 7:13 AM >>>>>>> To: <mailto:gnso-ppsai4@icann.org> gnso-ppsai4(a)icann.org >>>>>>> Subject: [Gnso-ppsai4] Subteam's 4 moment - and a timely question >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi All, >>>>>>> It's Subteam 4's time to hit the books (the comments really) and report >>>>>>> back. Our reporting date is this Tuesday and we have a lot of work to do >>>>>>> - but not as much as you might think. there are about 76 comments in the >>>>>>> "no comment left behind" category and we want to divide them up. Who >>>>>>> has some time this week? Who can take on the review of a subset of >>>>>>> comments? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Please let me know as soon as possible (by 1pm Eastern, if possible) and >>>>>>> we will divvy up the 76 comments among the people who respond. We have >>>>>>> some great tools that Mary has created -- including easy links, >>>>>>> templates and summaries. I'll send those out at 1pm too. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> But please let us know if you can devote a few hours to this on or >>>>>>> before the end of the week - your time is much appreciated! >>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>> Kathy and Paul >>>>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Gnso-ppsai4 mailing list >>>> Gnso-ppsai4(a)icann.org >>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai4 >>> >>> >>> The contents of this message may be privileged and confidential. Therefore, >>> if this message has been received in error, please delete it without reading >>> it. Your receipt of this message is not intended to waive any applicable >>> privilege. Please do not disseminate this message without the permission of >>> the author. >> >

2 1

Subteam's 4 moment - and a timely question
by Kathy Kleiman Sept. 16, 2015

Sept. 16, 2015

Hi All, It's Subteam 4's time to hit the books (the comments really) and report back. Our reporting date is this Tuesday and we have a lot of work to do - but not as much as you might think. there are about 76 comments in the "no comment left behind" category and we want to divide them up. /Who has some time this week? Who can take on the review of a subset of comments? /Please let me know as soon as possible (by 1pm Eastern, if possible) and we will divvy up the 76 comments among the people who respond. We have some great tools that Mary has created -- including easy links, templates and summaries. I'll send those out at 1pm too. But please let us know if you can devote a few hours to this on or before the end of the week - your time is much appreciated! Best, Kathy and Paul

3 3

Transcription chairs-Sub Team 4 conveners-staff call 4 - Friday, 11 September 2015 at 13:00 UTC
by Terri Agnew Sept. 11, 2015

Sept. 11, 2015

Dear All, Please find attached the transcription of the PPSAI Subteam 4 call held on 11 September 2015. Kind regards Terri Agnew

1 0

MP3 PPSAI WG chairs-Sub Team 4 conveners-staff call 4 - Friday, 11 September 2015 at 13:00 UTC
by Terri Agnew Sept. 11, 2015

Sept. 11, 2015

Dear All, Please find below the attendance and MP3 recording for the PPSAI WG chairs-Sub Team 4 conveners-staff call 4 - Friday, 11 September 2015 at 13:00 UTC Transcript will follow upon receipt. MP3: https://icann.box.com/shared/static/pbiz12wazc96etbg2ho1bno91wm89rtd.mp3<http://mailer.samanage.com/wf/click?upn=zZ8xDDIU4PY795Cika7Nmy-2FNugFnAwo9a…> Attendees: Kathy Kleiman NCSG Paul McGrady IPC Frank Michlick Individual Steve Metalitz - IPC Graeme Bunton RrSG Apologies: None ICANN staff: Marika Konings Mary Wong Terri Agnew Thank you. Kind regards, Terri Agnew ------------------------------- Adobe Connect chat transcript for Monday, 11 September 2015 Terri Agnew:Welcome to the PPSAI WG chairs-Sub Team 4 conveners-staff call on 11 September 2015 Kathy:Hi All, What is the callin passcode? the one I have did not work Marika Konings:PPSAI Terri Agnew:SubTeam 4 or PPSAI will work Frank Michlick:Hello everyone. I might have to leave this call early, will let you know if that is the case. Kathy:on hold on phone Kathy:waiting to come in... Kathy:still on hold... Kathy:still on hold.... Terri Agnew:@Kathy, alerting op Frank Michlick:I've got mute on my mic Paul McGrady:Is that better? Frank Michlick:yes Paul McGrady:That's right Marika Konings:@Paul, Kathy, this sounds to me as exactly what you were asking for? Marika Konings:as Mary said, at the end of the day, it is the responsibility of the WG to ensure that all comments are considered and reviewed. Staff can assist in making this easier through the tools that are provided, but that doesn 't take away the responsibility of the WG to ensure that everything has been considered. Graeme Bunton:You're a bit quiet, Steve Frank Michlick:I have to jump off, sorry Kathy:Part II?? Kathy:Summary of Additional Comments? Mary Wong:yes Kathy:Sure Paul McGrady:Yay! Paul McGrady:Sounds great! Thanks everyone! Kathy:I cab't read the text files Kathy:Aren't they in Mac format? Mary Wong:rtf Kathy:good point, Graeme Paul McGrady:See ya bye!

1 0