Letter to Greg DiBiase and Council
Dear Standing Committee, As discussed on our call last week, please find attached my proposed letter to Greg and Council suggesting/inviting Council or the Requestor+Responder communities directly, to further the more political questions of what constitute requests; allowing to focus on our Pilot Monitoring mandate. Please review and comment. Absent any changes I will send it following our call Monday. Kindly, Sebastien Ducos GoDaddy Registry | Senior Client Services Manager [signature_1642351011] +33612284445 France & Australia sebastien@registry.godaddy<mailto:sebastien@registry.godaddy>
Good move! Thanks. Steve On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 8:33 AM Sebastien--- via Gnso-rdrs-sc < gnso-rdrs-sc@icann.org> wrote:
Dear Standing Committee,
As discussed on our call last week, please find attached my proposed letter to Greg and Council suggesting/inviting Council or the Requestor+Responder communities directly, to further the more political questions of what constitute requests; allowing to focus on our Pilot Monitoring mandate.
Please review and comment. Absent any changes I will send it following our call Monday.
Kindly,
*Sebastien Ducos*
GoDaddy Registry | Senior Client Services Manager
[image: signature_1642351011]
+33612284445
France & Australia
sebastien@registry.godaddy
_______________________________________________ Gnso-rdrs-sc mailing list -- gnso-rdrs-sc@icann.org To unsubscribe send an email to gnso-rdrs-sc-leave@icann.org
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-- Sent by a Verified [image: Sent by a Verified sender] <https://wallet.unumid.co/authenticate?referralCode=tcp16fM4W47y> sender
Seb, Thanks for doing this! I made some revisions in the attached. John From: Sebastien--- via Gnso-rdrs-sc <gnso-rdrs-sc@icann.org> Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2024 8:33 AM To: gnso-rdrs-sc@icann.org Subject: [Gnso-rdrs-sc] Letter to Greg DiBiase and Council Dear Standing Committee, As discussed on our call last week, please find attached my proposed letter to Greg and Council suggesting/inviting Council or the Requestor+Responder communities directly, to further the more political questions of Dear Standing Committee, As discussed on our call last week, please find attached my proposed letter to Greg and Council suggesting/inviting Council or the Requestor+Responder communities directly, to further the more political questions of what constitute requests; allowing to focus on our Pilot Monitoring mandate. Please review and comment. Absent any changes I will send it following our call Monday. Kindly, Sebastien Ducos GoDaddy Registry | Senior Client Services Manager [signature_1642351011] +33612284445 France & Australia sebastien@registry.godaddy<mailto:sebastien@registry.godaddy> Confidentiality Notice This message is intended exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure. If you are not the named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately either by phone (800-237-2000) or reply to this e-mail and delete all copies of this message.
Hi Sebastien, thanks for drafting this! I'm good with the overall sentiment, but I'm not sure that we would all agree to this paragraph:
/Through these exchanges during ICANN79 & 80, it has become clearly apparent to us that the Requestor and Respondent Communities need more permanent fora to share and discuss their respective needs and the others’ capacity to respond to them, to potentially find a middle ground in a set of best practices or policy./
I think there are already permanent fora to develop policy, we've been through a whole PDP WG on specifically that topic which led us to this Standing Committee. We should remove "or policy" from that paragraph. Thank you, *Sarah Wyld, CIPP/E* Policy & Privacy Manager Pronouns: she/they swyld@tucows.com On 2024-06-27 8:32 a.m., Sebastien--- via Gnso-rdrs-sc wrote:
Dear Standing Committee,
As discussed on our call last week, please find attached my proposed letter to Greg and Council suggesting/inviting Council or the Requestor+Responder communities directly, to further the more political questions of what constitute requests; allowing to focus on our Pilot Monitoring mandate.
Please review and comment. Absent any changes I will send it following our call Monday.
Kindly,
*Sebastien Ducos*
GoDaddy Registry | Senior Client Services Manager
signature_1642351011
+33612284445
France & Australia
sebastien@registry.godaddy <mailto:sebastien@registry.godaddy>
_______________________________________________ Gnso-rdrs-sc mailing list --gnso-rdrs-sc@icann.org To unsubscribe send an email tognso-rdrs-sc-leave@icann.org
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Sarah, I disagree. The Requestors (Respondents) do not have a venue that is as organized and as resourced as the Registrars. Neither the Requestors nor the Registrars are well served under the existing arrangement. Steve On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 9:36 AM Sarah Wyld via Gnso-rdrs-sc < gnso-rdrs-sc@icann.org> wrote:
Hi Sebastien, thanks for drafting this!
I'm good with the overall sentiment, but I'm not sure that we would all agree to this paragraph:
*Through these exchanges during ICANN79 & 80, it has become clearly apparent to us that the Requestor and Respondent Communities need more permanent fora to share and discuss their respective needs and the others’ capacity to respond to them, to potentially find a middle ground in a set of best practices or policy.*
I think there are already permanent fora to develop policy, we've been through a whole PDP WG on specifically that topic which led us to this Standing Committee. We should remove "or policy" from that paragraph.
Thank you,
*Sarah Wyld, CIPP/E*
Policy & Privacy Manager Pronouns: she/they
swyld@tucows.com On 2024-06-27 8:32 a.m., Sebastien--- via Gnso-rdrs-sc wrote:
Dear Standing Committee,
As discussed on our call last week, please find attached my proposed letter to Greg and Council suggesting/inviting Council or the Requestor+Responder communities directly, to further the more political questions of what constitute requests; allowing to focus on our Pilot Monitoring mandate.
Please review and comment. Absent any changes I will send it following our call Monday.
Kindly,
*Sebastien Ducos*
GoDaddy Registry | Senior Client Services Manager
[image: signature_1642351011]
+33612284445
France & Australia
sebastien@registry.godaddy
_______________________________________________ Gnso-rdrs-sc mailing list -- gnso-rdrs-sc@icann.org To unsubscribe send an email to gnso-rdrs-sc-leave@icann.org
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
_______________________________________________ Gnso-rdrs-sc mailing list -- gnso-rdrs-sc@icann.org To unsubscribe send an email to gnso-rdrs-sc-leave@icann.org
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-- Sent by a Verified [image: Sent by a Verified sender] <https://wallet.unumid.co/authenticate?referralCode=tcp16fM4W47y> sender
I guess we'll continue to disagree on this. We are all part of the ICANN Community and all have our places in the multi-stakeholder policy development process. Thank you, *Sarah Wyld, CIPP/E* Policy & Privacy Manager Pronouns: she/they swyld@tucows.com On 2024-06-27 9:44 a.m., Steve Crocker wrote:
Sarah,
I disagree. The Requestors (Respondents) do not have a venue that is as organized and as resourced as the Registrars. Neither the Requestors nor the Registrars are well served under the existing arrangement.
Steve
On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 9:36 AM Sarah Wyld via Gnso-rdrs-sc <gnso-rdrs-sc@icann.org> wrote:
Hi Sebastien, thanks for drafting this!
I'm good with the overall sentiment, but I'm not sure that we would all agree to this paragraph:
> /Through these exchanges during ICANN79 & 80, it has become clearly apparent to us that the Requestor and Respondent Communities need more permanent fora to share and discuss their respective needs and the others’ capacity to respond to them, to potentially find a middle ground in a set of best practices or policy./
I think there are already permanent fora to develop policy, we've been through a whole PDP WG on specifically that topic which led us to this Standing Committee. We should remove "or policy" from that paragraph.
Thank you,
*Sarah Wyld, CIPP/E*
Policy & Privacy Manager Pronouns: she/they
swyld@tucows.com
On 2024-06-27 8:32 a.m., Sebastien--- via Gnso-rdrs-sc wrote:
Dear Standing Committee,
As discussed on our call last week, please find attached my proposed letter to Greg and Council suggesting/inviting Council or the Requestor+Responder communities directly, to further the more political questions of what constitute requests; allowing to focus on our Pilot Monitoring mandate.
Please review and comment. Absent any changes I will send it following our call Monday.
Kindly,
*Sebastien Ducos*
GoDaddy Registry | Senior Client Services Manager
signature_1642351011
+33612284445
France & Australia
sebastien@registry.godaddy <mailto:sebastien@registry.godaddy>
_______________________________________________ Gnso-rdrs-sc mailing list --gnso-rdrs-sc@icann.org To unsubscribe send an email tognso-rdrs-sc-leave@icann.org
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
_______________________________________________ Gnso-rdrs-sc mailing list -- gnso-rdrs-sc@icann.org To unsubscribe send an email to gnso-rdrs-sc-leave@icann.org
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-- Sent by a Verified Sent by a Verified sender <https://wallet.unumid.co/authenticate?referralCode=tcp16fM4W47y> sender
Heh, heh. Some have their places in the ICANN version of a multi-stakeholder community; some do not. Or, perhaps more precisely, some have first class places in the ICANN version of a multi-stakeholder community; others are left to figure out how to have their voices heard. Steve On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 9:46 AM Sarah Wyld <swyld@tucows.com> wrote:
I guess we'll continue to disagree on this. We are all part of the ICANN Community and all have our places in the multi-stakeholder policy development process.
Thank you,
*Sarah Wyld, CIPP/E*
Policy & Privacy Manager Pronouns: she/they
swyld@tucows.com On 2024-06-27 9:44 a.m., Steve Crocker wrote:
Sarah,
I disagree. The Requestors (Respondents) do not have a venue that is as organized and as resourced as the Registrars. Neither the Requestors nor the Registrars are well served under the existing arrangement.
Steve
On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 9:36 AM Sarah Wyld via Gnso-rdrs-sc < gnso-rdrs-sc@icann.org> wrote:
Hi Sebastien, thanks for drafting this!
I'm good with the overall sentiment, but I'm not sure that we would all agree to this paragraph:
*Through these exchanges during ICANN79 & 80, it has become clearly apparent to us that the Requestor and Respondent Communities need more permanent fora to share and discuss their respective needs and the others’ capacity to respond to them, to potentially find a middle ground in a set of best practices or policy.*
I think there are already permanent fora to develop policy, we've been through a whole PDP WG on specifically that topic which led us to this Standing Committee. We should remove "or policy" from that paragraph.
Thank you,
*Sarah Wyld, CIPP/E*
Policy & Privacy Manager Pronouns: she/they
swyld@tucows.com On 2024-06-27 8:32 a.m., Sebastien--- via Gnso-rdrs-sc wrote:
Dear Standing Committee,
As discussed on our call last week, please find attached my proposed letter to Greg and Council suggesting/inviting Council or the Requestor+Responder communities directly, to further the more political questions of what constitute requests; allowing to focus on our Pilot Monitoring mandate.
Please review and comment. Absent any changes I will send it following our call Monday.
Kindly,
*Sebastien Ducos*
GoDaddy Registry | Senior Client Services Manager
[image: signature_1642351011]
+33612284445
France & Australia
sebastien@registry.godaddy
_______________________________________________ Gnso-rdrs-sc mailing list -- gnso-rdrs-sc@icann.org To unsubscribe send an email to gnso-rdrs-sc-leave@icann.org
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
_______________________________________________ Gnso-rdrs-sc mailing list -- gnso-rdrs-sc@icann.org To unsubscribe send an email to gnso-rdrs-sc-leave@icann.org
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-- Sent by a Verified [image: Sent by a Verified sender] <https://wallet.unumid.co/authenticate?referralCode=tcp16fM4W47y> sender
-- Sent by a Verified [image: Sent by a Verified sender] <https://wallet.unumid.co/authenticate?referralCode=tcp16fM4W47y> sender
I agree with the intent of the letter. I also agree with Sarah on removing the word policy. I also fear that the “requestors” advocacy comes across as to be treated as a separate stakeholder (something I see keeps being brought up that their voices not being heard etc) Especially the requesters with commercial interest should use the avenues available at ICANN to facilitate disclosure. Which means through their stakeholder group. In this case the commercial stakeholder group which has been equally treated throughout ICANN’s history. Farzaneh On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 3:50 PM Steve Crocker via Gnso-rdrs-sc < gnso-rdrs-sc@icann.org> wrote:
Heh, heh. Some have their places in the ICANN version of a multi-stakeholder community; some do not. Or, perhaps more precisely, some have first class places in the ICANN version of a multi-stakeholder community; others are left to figure out how to have their voices heard.
Steve
On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 9:46 AM Sarah Wyld <swyld@tucows.com> wrote:
I guess we'll continue to disagree on this. We are all part of the ICANN Community and all have our places in the multi-stakeholder policy development process.
Thank you,
*Sarah Wyld, CIPP/E*
Policy & Privacy Manager Pronouns: she/they
swyld@tucows.com On 2024-06-27 9:44 a.m., Steve Crocker wrote:
Sarah,
I disagree. The Requestors (Respondents) do not have a venue that is as organized and as resourced as the Registrars. Neither the Requestors nor the Registrars are well served under the existing arrangement.
Steve
On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 9:36 AM Sarah Wyld via Gnso-rdrs-sc < gnso-rdrs-sc@icann.org> wrote:
Hi Sebastien, thanks for drafting this!
I'm good with the overall sentiment, but I'm not sure that we would all agree to this paragraph:
*Through these exchanges during ICANN79 & 80, it has become clearly apparent to us that the Requestor and Respondent Communities need more permanent fora to share and discuss their respective needs and the others’ capacity to respond to them, to potentially find a middle ground in a set of best practices or policy.*
I think there are already permanent fora to develop policy, we've been through a whole PDP WG on specifically that topic which led us to this Standing Committee. We should remove "or policy" from that paragraph.
Thank you,
*Sarah Wyld, CIPP/E*
Policy & Privacy Manager Pronouns: she/they
swyld@tucows.com On 2024-06-27 8:32 a.m., Sebastien--- via Gnso-rdrs-sc wrote:
Dear Standing Committee,
As discussed on our call last week, please find attached my proposed letter to Greg and Council suggesting/inviting Council or the Requestor+Responder communities directly, to further the more political questions of what constitute requests; allowing to focus on our Pilot Monitoring mandate.
Please review and comment. Absent any changes I will send it following our call Monday.
Kindly,
*Sebastien Ducos*
GoDaddy Registry | Senior Client Services Manager
[image: signature_1642351011]
+33612284445
France & Australia
sebastien@registry.godaddy
_______________________________________________ Gnso-rdrs-sc mailing list -- gnso-rdrs-sc@icann.org To unsubscribe send an email to gnso-rdrs-sc-leave@icann.org
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
_______________________________________________ Gnso-rdrs-sc mailing list -- gnso-rdrs-sc@icann.org To unsubscribe send an email to gnso-rdrs-sc-leave@icann.org
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-- Sent by a Verified [image: Sent by a Verified sender] <https://wallet.unumid.co/authenticate?referralCode=tcp16fM4W47y> sender
-- Sent by a Verified [image: Sent by a Verified sender] <https://wallet.unumid.co/authenticate?referralCode=tcp16fM4W47y> sender _______________________________________________ Gnso-rdrs-sc mailing list -- gnso-rdrs-sc@icann.org To unsubscribe send an email to gnso-rdrs-sc-leave@icann.org
_______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Seb, If you are going to replace “policies” in the letter, please replace it with a term that equates to the internal standards, rules, “policies”, etc. (pick whatever synonym makes sense to the registrar community) for the decision-making process to evaluate a disclosure request. That is what I intended and I think you did as well. John From: farzaneh badii via Gnso-rdrs-sc <gnso-rdrs-sc@icann.org> Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2024 2:19 PM To: Steve Crocker <steve@shinkuro.com> Cc: gnso-rdrs-sc@icann.org Subject: [Gnso-rdrs-sc] Re: Letter to Greg DiBiase and Council I agree with the intent of the letter. I also agree with Sarah on removing the word policy. I also fear that the “requestors” advocacy comes across as to be treated as a separate stakeholder (something I see keeps being brought up that their I agree with the intent of the letter. I also agree with Sarah on removing the word policy. I also fear that the “requestors” advocacy comes across as to be treated as a separate stakeholder (something I see keeps being brought up that their voices not being heard etc) Especially the requesters with commercial interest should use the avenues available at ICANN to facilitate disclosure. Which means through their stakeholder group. In this case the commercial stakeholder group which has been equally treated throughout ICANN’s history. Farzaneh On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 3:50 PM Steve Crocker via Gnso-rdrs-sc <gnso-rdrs-sc@icann.org<mailto:gnso-rdrs-sc@icann.org>> wrote: Heh, heh. Some have their places in the ICANN version of a multi-stakeholder community; some do not. Or, perhaps more precisely, some have first class places in the ICANN version of a multi-stakeholder community; others are left to figure out how to have their voices heard. Steve On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 9:46 AM Sarah Wyld <swyld@tucows.com<mailto:swyld@tucows.com>> wrote: I guess we'll continue to disagree on this. We are all part of the ICANN Community and all have our places in the multi-stakeholder policy development process. Thank you, Sarah Wyld, CIPP/E Policy & Privacy Manager Pronouns: she/they swyld@tucows.com<mailto:swyld@tucows.com> On 2024-06-27 9:44 a.m., Steve Crocker wrote: Sarah, I disagree. The Requestors (Respondents) do not have a venue that is as organized and as resourced as the Registrars. Neither the Requestors nor the Registrars are well served under the existing arrangement. Steve On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 9:36 AM Sarah Wyld via Gnso-rdrs-sc <gnso-rdrs-sc@icann.org<mailto:gnso-rdrs-sc@icann.org>> wrote: Hi Sebastien, thanks for drafting this! I'm good with the overall sentiment, but I'm not sure that we would all agree to this paragraph:
Through these exchanges during ICANN79 & 80, it has become clearly apparent to us that the Requestor and Respondent Communities need more permanent fora to share and discuss their respective needs and the others’ capacity to respond to them, to potentially find a middle ground in a set of best practices or policy.
I think there are already permanent fora to develop policy, we've been through a whole PDP WG on specifically that topic which led us to this Standing Committee. We should remove "or policy" from that paragraph. Thank you, Sarah Wyld, CIPP/E Policy & Privacy Manager Pronouns: she/they swyld@tucows.com<mailto:swyld@tucows.com> On 2024-06-27 8:32 a.m., Sebastien--- via Gnso-rdrs-sc wrote: Dear Standing Committee, As discussed on our call last week, please find attached my proposed letter to Greg and Council suggesting/inviting Council or the Requestor+Responder communities directly, to further the more political questions of what constitute requests; allowing to focus on our Pilot Monitoring mandate. Please review and comment. Absent any changes I will send it following our call Monday. Kindly, Sebastien Ducos GoDaddy Registry | Senior Client Services Manager [signature_1642351011] +33612284445 France & Australia sebastien@registry.godaddy<mailto:sebastien@registry.godaddy> _______________________________________________ Gnso-rdrs-sc mailing list -- gnso-rdrs-sc@icann.org<mailto:gnso-rdrs-sc@icann.org> To unsubscribe send an email to gnso-rdrs-sc-leave@icann.org<mailto:gnso-rdrs-sc-leave@icann.org> _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.icann.org/privacy/policy__;!!LBFcHN3WCgnqDQ!jWH1P7FMAvvPhaefeKgg8WYLOLod4x6qRWcdjD3HIBNCGD82culjteWcIAR4HrXepfS6-aJwl2W3u0v8zvsBq9JGbmHEl4c$>) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.icann.org/privacy/tos__;!!LBFcHN3WCgnqDQ!jWH1P7FMAvvPhaefeKgg8WYLOLod4x6qRWcdjD3HIBNCGD82culjteWcIAR4HrXepfS6-aJwl2W3u0v8zvsBq9JGg1Ydop8$>). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on. _______________________________________________ Gnso-rdrs-sc mailing list -- gnso-rdrs-sc@icann.org<mailto:gnso-rdrs-sc@icann.org> To unsubscribe send an email to gnso-rdrs-sc-leave@icann.org<mailto:gnso-rdrs-sc-leave@icann.org> _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.icann.org/privacy/policy__;!!LBFcHN3WCgnqDQ!jWH1P7FMAvvPhaefeKgg8WYLOLod4x6qRWcdjD3HIBNCGD82culjteWcIAR4HrXepfS6-aJwl2W3u0v8zvsBq9JGbmHEl4c$>) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.icann.org/privacy/tos__;!!LBFcHN3WCgnqDQ!jWH1P7FMAvvPhaefeKgg8WYLOLod4x6qRWcdjD3HIBNCGD82culjteWcIAR4HrXepfS6-aJwl2W3u0v8zvsBq9JGg1Ydop8$>). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on. -- Sent by a Verified [Sent by a Verified sender]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/wallet.unumid.co/authenticate?referralCod...> sender -- Sent by a Verified [Sent by a Verified sender]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/wallet.unumid.co/authenticate?referralCod...> sender _______________________________________________ Gnso-rdrs-sc mailing list -- gnso-rdrs-sc@icann.org<mailto:gnso-rdrs-sc@icann.org> To unsubscribe send an email to gnso-rdrs-sc-leave@icann.org<mailto:gnso-rdrs-sc-leave@icann.org> _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.icann.org/privacy/policy__;!!LBFcHN3WCgnqDQ!jWH1P7FMAvvPhaefeKgg8WYLOLod4x6qRWcdjD3HIBNCGD82culjteWcIAR4HrXepfS6-aJwl2W3u0v8zvsBq9JGbmHEl4c$>) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.icann.org/privacy/tos__;!!LBFcHN3WCgnqDQ!jWH1P7FMAvvPhaefeKgg8WYLOLod4x6qRWcdjD3HIBNCGD82culjteWcIAR4HrXepfS6-aJwl2W3u0v8zvsBq9JGg1Ydop8$>). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on. Confidentiality Notice This message is intended exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure. If you are not the named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately either by phone (800-237-2000) or reply to this e-mail and delete all copies of this message.
Sarah, I took the “policy” in its dictionary sense and not as developing GNSO Policy. John From: Sarah Wyld via Gnso-rdrs-sc <gnso-rdrs-sc@icann.org> Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2024 9:36 AM To: gnso-rdrs-sc@icann.org Subject: [Gnso-rdrs-sc] Re: Letter to Greg DiBiase and Council Hi Sebastien, thanks for drafting this! I'm good with the overall sentiment, but I'm not sure that we would all agree to this paragraph: > Through these exchanges during ICANN79 & 80, it has become clearly apparent to us that the Requestor Hi Sebastien, thanks for drafting this! I'm good with the overall sentiment, but I'm not sure that we would all agree to this paragraph:
Through these exchanges during ICANN79 & 80, it has become clearly apparent to us that the Requestor and Respondent Communities need more permanent fora to share and discuss their respective needs and the others’ capacity to respond to them, to potentially find a middle ground in a set of best practices or policy.
I think there are already permanent fora to develop policy, we've been through a whole PDP WG on specifically that topic which led us to this Standing Committee. We should remove "or policy" from that paragraph. Thank you, Sarah Wyld, CIPP/E Policy & Privacy Manager Pronouns: she/they swyld@tucows.com<mailto:swyld@tucows.com> On 2024-06-27 8:32 a.m., Sebastien--- via Gnso-rdrs-sc wrote: Dear Standing Committee, As discussed on our call last week, please find attached my proposed letter to Greg and Council suggesting/inviting Council or the Requestor+Responder communities directly, to further the more political questions of what constitute requests; allowing to focus on our Pilot Monitoring mandate. Please review and comment. Absent any changes I will send it following our call Monday. Kindly, Sebastien Ducos GoDaddy Registry | Senior Client Services Manager [signature_1642351011] +33612284445 France & Australia sebastien@registry.godaddy<mailto:sebastien@registry.godaddy> _______________________________________________ Gnso-rdrs-sc mailing list -- gnso-rdrs-sc@icann.org<mailto:gnso-rdrs-sc@icann.org> To unsubscribe send an email to gnso-rdrs-sc-leave@icann.org<mailto:gnso-rdrs-sc-leave@icann.org> _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.icann.org/privacy/policy__;!!LBFcHN3WCgnqDQ!gEkFyXAjds9ZOqR2zEmIW1KC230jtQAxNONYW6w2RnJvMKyfSpkf1k9IWPKSCG-b2pt-Diy0BzX_rZxQF8nMHEThn0eNb-k$>) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.icann.org/privacy/tos__;!!LBFcHN3WCgnqDQ!gEkFyXAjds9ZOqR2zEmIW1KC230jtQAxNONYW6w2RnJvMKyfSpkf1k9IWPKSCG-b2pt-Diy0BzX_rZxQF8nMHEThw4rmd1M$>). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on. Confidentiality Notice This message is intended exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure. If you are not the named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately either by phone (800-237-2000) or reply to this e-mail and delete all copies of this message.
participants (5)
-
farzaneh badii -
John McElwaine -
Sarah Wyld -
Sebastien＠registry.godaddy -
Steve Crocker