March 2018 - Gnso-rds-pdp-4

DT4 deliberation on Wednesday's F2F agenda
by Lisa Phifer March 11, 2018

March 11, 2018

First, many thanks to Fabricio and Brian for presenting DT4's answers in yesterday's F2F session here at ICANN61. Watch for meeting notes to be distributed with points raised during the DT4 discussion. There was good discussion on DT4 and especially on whether to focus the purpose on entities interested in receiving unsolicited offers or with confirmed interest in selling their DN. As you will see, we did not complete the readout of answers for all drafting teams - the remainder will be first on the agenda for Wednesday's F2F session. However, after that readout is done, we will resume deliberation on specific purposes. One of the two purposes likely to be on the Wednesday's agenda is Domain Name Purpose/Sale. I would like to confirm who from DT4 plans to be present at Wednesday's session to participate in deliberation of DN Purpose/Sale. I believe those present in person will be: Fabricio, Brian, Erica With remote participation possibly by: Sam, Benjamin, Rob Please confirm by replying to this email whether you'll attend Wednesday's F2F to participate in deliberation of DN Purchase/Sale. Wednesday March 14, 2018 (15.15-18.30 local time) Updated agenda will soon be posted here: https://community.icann.org/x/zAi8B Thanks Lisa

3 3

Updated proposed final DT4 answers
by Lisa Phifer March 8, 2018

March 8, 2018

DT4, Attached is an updated proposed-final version of DT4 answers, with changes to address Rob's comments redlined. Rob, I did not include your proposed edits to the purpose definition itself, as those can be discussed in the F2F session on Wednesday where the full WG will consider already-submitted purpose definitions. I also did not include new text on possible contact with Registrars as edits where not straightforward, so I think this deserves discussion during the F2F session on Saturday where DT4's answers are discussed. Given the lateness of these updates, I ask that any DT4 member who objects to these updates do so no later than COB today 7 March. Best, Lisa

1 1

ICANN61 Prep Assignment
by Lisa Phifer March 7, 2018

March 7, 2018

Drafting Team 4, Thanks again to those of you who prepped to provide an intro to DN Purchase/Sale during the past few WG calls. As those who were on today's call heard, we have decided to take a week to prep for ICANN61 by working on a specific assignment in drafting team mode. Our team's assignment is to reexamine our past output on DN Purchase/Sale: https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/74580010/DraftingTeam4-DNPu rchaseSale-Purpose-v9-clean.pdf to answer the following questions more explicitly and conceptually: 1. Who associated with the domain name registration needs to be identified and/or contacted for each purpose? 2. What is the objective achieved by identifying and/or contacting each of those entities? 3. What might be expected of that entity with regard to the domain name? To prep for ICANN61, it is imperative that we discuss these questions and produce output over the next week - ideally by 5 March but no later than 7 March. We know this is a tall order, give a short timeframe. However, the leadership believes that this will help us use our F2F time at ICANN61 more effectively, which I hope we all agree would be a terrific idea. To give us a head start, attached please find a first draft at answers, prepared by me from our past output, and raising a few potential gaps for discussion. To learn more about this assignment, please read these instructions: https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/79432608/Drafting%20Team%20 Assignment%2026%20Feb.pdf If you were unable to attend today's WG call, please catch up by reading or listening to the call recording/notes/transcript: https://community.icann.org/x/oAu8B To get started, please ask any questions you may have about this assignment within the next 24 hours. If you have any suggested edits or additions or deletions to the attached first draft, even better! I encourage you to share them in reply to this message, copying the DT mailing list gnso-rds-pdp-4(a)icann.org Thanks for doing what you can to help this drafting team come through on this new assignment. Best, Lisa

5 11

Re: [Gnso-rds-pdp-4] Please review attached v2 answers
by Lisa Phifer March 5, 2018

March 5, 2018

1 0

Call for input
by Lisa Phifer March 2, 2018

March 2, 2018

DT4, please take a look at the draft distributed on Tuesday: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rds-pdp-4/attachments/20180227/24383c98/… And Erica’s feedback below. Any further inputs? Thanks in advance for helping address these questions as input to our F2F at ICANN61. Speaking of which: who plans to participate in person or remotely? Best Lisa Thanks very much Erica – Does anyone have any suggested text for why the registrars need to be identified or contacted (and by whom), the expectations of the registrars, etc? We may also want to add something about the benefit to both buyer and seller – a point raised on yesterday’s WG call but after I took my first cut at that draft. Best, Lisa From: Erica Varlese [mailto:erica at my.blog] Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2018 5:53 AM To: Lisa Phifer Cc: gnso-rds-pdp-4 at icann.org Subject: Re: [Gnso-rds-pdp-4] ICANN61 Prep Assignment Hi Lisa, Thank you for writing the first draft! I read through and only have one minor suggestion. On the following line, I would suggest adding that both the buyer and the seller expect communication to be reliably relayed. > In the case of relayed communication, the buyer **and seller** expect communication to be reliably relayed by the Privacy/Proxy to the authentic entity who has legal rights to sell the domain name. Regarding the final question, I believe the answer is yes. One the seller initiates the transfer, the registrar should complete the translate process post-acquisition. Curious to hear others' thoughts too! Best, Erica

1 0