I share Lisa's interpretation of this task. At this stage of our work plan, we should only be looking at how the existing WHOIS protocol is being used or misused. - Ayden On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 8:27 PM, Lisa Phifer lisa@corecom.com wrote: Hi Andrew, My answer was not intended to limit how use cases are used by the WG throughout this PDP. It was just to clarify the focus of the current action item seeking example use cases for discussion over the next couple of WG calls. While we are still prepping for deliberations, my understanding was that we are starting with use cases to develop a shared understanding of today's real-world scenarios. It's very useful to flag problems that may need to be solved, possible improvements, etc, within use cases. However, deliberating on any new possible requirements suggested within an example use case should occur once we enter deliberation. Best, Lisa At 01:09 PM 7/24/2016, Andrew Sullivan wrote: Why? If that's the rule, then there's no point: we're doomed forever to the stupidity of Whois. A -- Andrew Sullivan Please excuse my clumbsy thums. On Jul 24, 2016, at 14:55, Lisa Phifer < lisa@corecom.com > wrote: Good question - use cases should describe today's real-world scenarios. At 11:57 AM 7/24/2016, Stephanie Perrin wrote: Just as a question, when we do use cases are we supposed to put in hypotheticals or talk about them as they are now? Eg tiered access does not exist at the moment, do we imagine our use cases as we would like to see them? Sorry not to have been paying close enough attention to this. Stephanie Perrin On 2016-07-24 12:48, Michele Neylon - Blacknight wrote: Karnika  Thanks for the example.  In order to make it easier to process use cases I’d rd recommend you break them out as specifically as possible.  So defamation would be quite different to identity theft.  Regards  Michele  -- Mr Michele Neylon Blacknight Solutions Hosting, Colocation & Domains http://www.blacknight.host/ http://blog.blacknight.com/ http://ceo.hosting/ Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072 Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090 ------------------------------- Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265, Ireland Company No.: 370845  From: <gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of karnika <karnika@sethassociates.com> Date: Saturday 23 July 2016 at 01:51 To: “gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org” <gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org> Subject: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Example Use case  Dear All,  I have prepared an Example Use case which is attached herewith. Please feel free to comment and give your inputs so that we can discuss it in our future meetings.  With Regards,  Karnika Seth Attorney at law. & Founding Partner   SETH ASSOCIATES ADVOCATES AND LEGAL CONSULTANTS  , <398b2597.jpg>  (O): B- 10, Sector 40, Noida-201301, N.C.R, India.  (Mon-Sat, 9.30 am-6 pm) Tel: + 91(120) 4352846,4331304 , Mob: + 91 9810155766 Fax: + 91 (120) 4331304. Website: www.sethassociates.com , www.lexcyberia.com E-mail: mail@sethassociates.com , mail@lexcyberia.com  Computers, Internet & New Technology Laws by Karnika Seth, Lexis Nexis Butterworths,2013  <398b2597.gif>  LinkedIn  <398b25a7.gif>  Facebook <398b25b6.gif>  Twitter     _______________________________________________ gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.orghttps://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg _______________________________________________ gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg _______________________________________________ gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg Ayden Férdeline Statement of Interest