Well yes, there is that too ☺ -- Mr Michele Neylon Blacknight Solutions Hosting, Colocation & Domains https://www.blacknight.com/ http://blacknight.blog/ Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072 Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090 Social: http://mneylon.social Some thoughts: http://ceo.hosting/ ------------------------------- Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265,Ireland Company No.: 370845 From: Sam Lanfranco <sam@lanfranco.net> Date: Monday 30 January 2017 at 13:25 To: Michele Neylon <michele@blacknight.com>, Ayden Férdeline <icann@ferdeline.com>, RDS PDP WG <gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org> Subject: Re: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Proposed resolution for raw poll data I might add that without proper agreement by each individual, to disclosure of past data would put the WG in violation of the law in a number of jurisdictions. Also, in a move to disclosure, each participant would have to expressly agree (consensus could not be binding on all). Those who do not agree would probably have to not participate, since macro data and the majority of disclosed results would leave them identifiable. Sam L. On 1/30/2017 8:04 AM, Michele Neylon - Blacknight wrote: Ayden I have no issue with “raw” or “processed” data being shared BUT only for future polls where people know that the data is going to be shared in that manner. Doing it retroactively is not a good idea and I would oppose it. Regards Michele < rest deleted >