Thanks Marika! If it really did eliminate it, then I can relax. I am just wondering..... SP On 2016-08-15 17:23, Marika Konings wrote:
Hi Stephanie,
A GNSO consensus policy was implemented a couple of years back which according to data collected nearly eliminated the issue of domain tasting (see https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2009-08-12-en) <https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2009-08-12-en%29>. Not sure whether that changes your view on whether a use case is still needed, but I thought I would share regardless.
Best regards,
Marika
*Marika Konings*
Senior Policy Director & Team Leader for the GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
Email: marika.konings@icann.org <mailto:marika.konings@icann.org>
//
/Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO/
/Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses <http://learn.icann.org/courses/gnso> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages <http://gnso.icann.org/sites/gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/presentations/policy-efforts.htm#newcomers>./
*From: *<gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Stephanie Perrin <stephanie.perrin@mail.utoronto.ca> *Date: *Monday 15 August 2016 at 14:36 *To: *"gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org" <gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org> *Subject: *[gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Use cases
I think we need a use case on domain tasting. I am certainly not the person to write it, as I barely understand how it works, but I do think we need one, given the extent of the practice (in my limited understanding).
Stephanie Perrin