Thank you Kathy.
On 8 Jun 2016, at 10:37 AM, Kathy Kleiman <kathy@kathykleiman.com> wrote:
Hi All, Because I had entirely too much time on a flight, I put together a few extra materials: 1. Constitution of California, Massachusetts Right of Privacy, and McINTYRE, v. OHIO ELECTIONS COMMISSION (US Supreme Court, 1995) 2. Following Steve's example, a document that provides possible requirements for evaluation alongside existing documents 3. A few Whois Review Team Final Report points to supplement those provided by Susan.
Best, Kathy <Constitution of California, Privacy Law of Massachusetts and McIntyre v Ohio Elections Comm'n US Sup Court for RDS WG.doc><Kleiman document for RDS WG.doc><Whois Review Team Final Report - a few additional points for RDS WG.doc>_______________________________________________ gnso-rds-pdp-wg mailing list gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org <mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pdp-wg>