Re: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Final Problem Statement
Hi Marika, It appears the community edits to the 2nd sentence in the first paragraph did not make it into the final statement. The core problem will be to “deal with” the tension – were we not going to use “accommodate” or some other wording? I personally think “take into consideration” or “ease” would be more appropriate as I still feel that this sentence goes beyond ICANN’s remit. Thanks, Sara From: <gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org> Date: Monday, August 29, 2016 at 9:36 AM To: "gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org" <gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org> Subject: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Final Problem Statement Dear All, Following last week’s RDS PDP WG meeting, please find attached the final text of the problem statement. This final text will be posted here: https://community.icann.org/x/rACbAw. As a reminder, this problem statement is meant as a tool to aid in discussion, consistent with but not a constraint on the Working Group and its Charter. Best regards, Marika Marika Konings Senior Policy Director & Team Leader for the GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: marika.konings@icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org> Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses<http://learn.icann.org/courses/gnso> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages<http://gnso.icann.org/sites/gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/presentations/policy-e...>.
Sara, If my memory is correct, the last proposal on the call was ‘to deal with’ . I agree with you that it is not ICANN’s mission to solve tensions but this is not a problem statement for ICANN but rather for the working group. And a problem we will have in the WG will be to deal with the tension between opposing positions. Chuck From: gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Sara Bockey Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2016 10:06 AM To: Marika Konings; gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org Subject: Re: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Final Problem Statement Hi Marika, It appears the community edits to the 2nd sentence in the first paragraph did not make it into the final statement. The core problem will be to “deal with” the tension – were we not going to use “accommodate” or some other wording? I personally think “take into consideration” or “ease” would be more appropriate as I still feel that this sentence goes beyond ICANN’s remit. Thanks, Sara From: <gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org<mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org>> on behalf of Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org>> Date: Monday, August 29, 2016 at 9:36 AM To: "gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org<mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org>" <gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org<mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org>> Subject: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Final Problem Statement Dear All, Following last week’s RDS PDP WG meeting, please find attached the final text of the problem statement. This final text will be posted here: https://community.icann.org/x/rACbAw. As a reminder, this problem statement is meant as a tool to aid in discussion, consistent with but not a constraint on the Working Group and its Charter. Best regards, Marika Marika Konings Senior Policy Director & Team Leader for the GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: marika.konings@icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org> Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses<http://learn.icann.org/courses/gnso> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages<http://gnso.icann.org/sites/gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/presentations/policy-e...>.
I also recall "deal with". The other phrases seemed like over-promising. ________________________________ From: gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org <gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@verisign.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2016 8:17:46 AM To: Sara Bockey; Marika Konings; gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org Subject: Re: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Final Problem Statement Sara, If my memory is correct, the last proposal on the call was 'to deal with' . I agree with you that it is not ICANN's mission to solve tensions but this is not a problem statement for ICANN but rather for the working group. And a problem we will have in the WG will be to deal with the tension between opposing positions. Chuck From: gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Sara Bockey Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2016 10:06 AM To: Marika Konings; gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org Subject: Re: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Final Problem Statement Hi Marika, It appears the community edits to the 2nd sentence in the first paragraph did not make it into the final statement. The core problem will be to "deal with" the tension - were we not going to use "accommodate" or some other wording? I personally think "take into consideration" or "ease" would be more appropriate as I still feel that this sentence goes beyond ICANN's remit. Thanks, Sara From: <gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org<mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org>> on behalf of Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org>> Date: Monday, August 29, 2016 at 9:36 AM To: "gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org<mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org>" <gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org<mailto:gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org>> Subject: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Final Problem Statement Dear All, Following last week's RDS PDP WG meeting, please find attached the final text of the problem statement. This final text will be posted here: https://community.icann.org/x/rACbAw. As a reminder, this problem statement is meant as a tool to aid in discussion, consistent with but not a constraint on the Working Group and its Charter. Best regards, Marika Marika Konings Senior Policy Director & Team Leader for the GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: marika.konings@icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org> Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses<http://learn.icann.org/courses/gnso> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages<http://gnso.icann.org/sites/gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/presentations/policy-e...>.
participants (3)
-
Gomes, Chuck -
Mark Svancarek -
Sara Bockey