Hi Marika, It appears the community edits to the 2nd sentence in the first paragraph did not make it into the final statement. The core problem will be to “deal with” the tension – were we not going to use “accommodate” or some other wording? I personally think “take into consideration” or “ease” would be more appropriate as I still feel that this sentence goes beyond ICANN’s remit. Thanks, Sara From: <gnso-rds-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org> Date: Monday, August 29, 2016 at 9:36 AM To: "gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org" <gnso-rds-pdp-wg@icann.org> Subject: [gnso-rds-pdp-wg] Final Problem Statement Dear All, Following last week’s RDS PDP WG meeting, please find attached the final text of the problem statement. This final text will be posted here: https://community.icann.org/x/rACbAw. As a reminder, this problem statement is meant as a tool to aid in discussion, consistent with but not a constraint on the Working Group and its Charter. Best regards, Marika Marika Konings Senior Policy Director & Team Leader for the GNSO, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: marika.konings@icann.org<mailto:marika.konings@icann.org> Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses<http://learn.icann.org/courses/gnso> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages<http://gnso.icann.org/sites/gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/presentations/policy-e...>.