May 2018 - Gnso-review-wg - lists.icann.org

Actions/Discussion Notes for GNSO Review WG Meeting on 24 May 2018
by Julie Hedlund May 24, 2018

May 24, 2018

Dear GNSO Review Working Group members, Please see below the action items and discussion notes captured by staff from the meeting on 24 May 2018. These high-level notes are designed to help WG members navigate through the content of the call and are not meant to be a substitute for the recording or transcript, which are posted on the wiki at: https://community.icann.org/display/GRWG/2018. Please note that the next meeting will occur on 07 June at 1300 UTC. Best regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director Action Items and Notes GNSO Review Working Group Meeting on Thursday, 24 May 2018 at 13:00 UTC Action Items: Action Item 1: Diversity Recommendations 6, 33, 35, and 36: Staff will revise the implementation charter and send it to the WG for a two-week review with final discussion during the call on 07 June. Action Item 2: Statement of Interest/Membership Recommendation 26, 27, 28, and 29: Staff will finalize the implementation charter and send it to the WG for a two-week consensus call. Action Item 3: Update to OEC & GNSO Council: Staff will draft an update report and slides and send it to the WG for a two-week review with final discussion during the call on 07 June. Notes: 1. Review agenda/SOIs: No updates to SOIs. 2. Status of Consensus Call for implementation charters for recommendations 1, 2, & 3, and for 20 and 21, closing 24 May 2018: As of the time of the WG meeting on 24 May there were no objections to or comments on the implementation charters. If none are received the recommendations will be considered approved by full consensus. 3. Status of Update to the GNSO Council: -- The update was sent to the Council on 14 May and due to time limitations was not included on the agenda for the Council meeting on 24 May. -- No comments or guidance was requested by the WG of the GNSO Council, and the Council had no comments on on the update. 4. Discussion of implementation charter for recommendations 6, 33, 35 and 36 on Diversity -- Recommendation 33: Question -- Referring to the NomCom: is that also done by the review of the NomCom? Answer: The GNSO Council can give them guidance or suggestions on our expectation for those who are appointed from the NomCom to the Council. -- Staff will check with the NomCom on their review and also revise the charter. >From the chat: -- from Marika Konings to All Participants: 'suggestions' maybe? -- from Wolf-Ulrich Knoben to All Participants: Maybe that was part of the recent NomCom review? -- from Marika Konings to All Participants: @Rafik, re. NomCom, I believe that the GNSO is always asked as well to confirm whether previous requirements are still applicable. -- from Rafik Dammak to All Participants: the board itself give input to nomcom every year about the expectation for those to be appointed to the board -- from Marika Konings to All Participants: @Rafik, re. NomCom, I believe that the GNSO is always asked as well to confirm whether previous requirements are still applicable. -- from Rafik Dammak to All Participants: the public comments was concerned with the finding any inconsistencies on recommendations but not for substantive changes -- from Rafik Dammak to All Participants: @Marika but I dont think we responded formally in last years? -- from Marika Konings to All Participants: @Rafik - yeah, I don't recall either any updates being made, but of course, the GNSO can also be proactive about this. -- from Rafik Dammak to All Participants: @Marika yes we have to be proactive, getting this as task would be helpful -- The term “cultural diversity” is not clearly defined. The element was outlined in the Sub Group on Diversity in Work Stream 2. Staff will reference that terminology. -- Board has sent a letter to the CCWG on the recommendations, but did not have any objections to the diversity recommendations. The public comment forum closed on 11 May, but the report of public comments has not been posted. -- In the discussion between the CCWG and Board that these recommendations are not contentious. -- With respect to privacy, staff will revise the charter to note that access to diversity data may be subject to privacy procedures to comply with GDPR. -- Staff will revise the charter and send it to the WG for a two-week review. >From the chat: -- from Rafik Dammak to All Participants: the public comments was concerned with the finding any inconsistencies on recommendations but not for sustantive changes -- from Marika Konings to All Participants: are there any privacy implications of starting to collect and publishing that kind of information? -- from Rafik Dammak to All Participants: I guess it has to comply with the new ICANN privacy policy -- from Rafik Dammak to All Participants: maybe asking the data protection officer? 5. Discussion of implementation charter for recommendations 26, 27, 28, and 29 – Updated re: GDPR -- The WG agreed to the draft implementation charter for these recommendations, which relate to statements of interest and membership lists, in November 2017. -- The WG agreed to place the recommendations on hold pending any ICANN actions to address possible compliance issues with GDPR. -- The draft charters have been updated to include the language that now is posted with statements of interest and membership lists to comply with GDPR. -- No change have been made to the WG determination section with respect to implementation. -- Staff will send the final charter to the WG for a two-week consensus call. 6. Preparation for Update to OEC and GNSO Council at ICANN62 -- In addition to a requirement for periodic updates to the GNSO Council, there is a requirement to update the Operational Effectiveness Committee (OEC) of the ICANN Board of Directors every 6 months. -- The last update to the OEC was at ICANN60. The next update is due for ICANN62. -- The deadline to submit documents for review at ICANN62 is 10 June and the OEC has requested the update from the WG by 08 June. -- Staff will update the report from ICANN60 to reflect the current status and send it to the WG for a two-week review and final discussion on 07 June. 6. Next Meeting: 07 June 1300 UTC: Staff will send the revised implementation charters for recommendations relating to diversity (6, 33, 35, 36) and the Draft Update to the OEC/GNSO Council 7. AOB: None.

1 0

Recording, Attendance & WebEx Chat | GNSO Review WG Call | Thursday, 24 May 2018 at 13:00 UTC
by Andrea Glandon May 24, 2018

May 24, 2018

Dear All, Please find the MP3 and attendance below and WebEx chat attached for the GNSO Review Working Group held on Thursday, 24 May 2018 at 13:00 UTC. MP3: https://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-review-24may18-en.mp3<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__audio.icann.org_gnso_g…> The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page: http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_group…> Mailing list archives: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-review-wg/ Wiki agenda page: https://community.icann.org/x/6RkFBQ Attendance Members: Jennifer Wolfe (RySG Primary) Sara Bockey (RrSG Primary) Wolf-Ulrich Knoben (ISPCP Primary) Rafik Dammak (NCSG Primary) Participants: None On Audio Only: None Apologies: Lori Schulman (IPC Primary) ICANN Staff: Marika Konings Julie Hedlund Andrea Glandon **Please let me know if your name has been left off of the list** Thank you. Kind Regards, Andrea Glandon

1 0

Agenda & Materials for Meeting on 24 May 2018 1300 UTC
by Julie Hedlund May 23, 2018

May 23, 2018

Dear GNSO Review Working Group members, Please see below the draft agenda for the meeting on Thursday, 24 May at 13:00 UTC. Please also see the attached materials and the action items below with updates from the previous meeting. Draft agenda: Review agenda/SOIs Status of Consensus Call for implementation charters for recommendations 1, 2, & 3, and for 20 and 21, closing 24 May 2018. Status of Update to the GNSO Council Discussion of implementation charter for recommendations 6, 33, 35 and 36 on Diversity Discussion of implementation charter for recommendations 26, 27, 28, and 29 – Updated re: GDPR Preparation for Update to OEC and GNSO Council at ICANN62 Next Meeting: 07 June 1300 UTC AOB Best regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director Action Items and Updates From GNSO Review Working Group Meeting on Thursday, 10 May 2018 at 13:00 UTC Action Item 1: implementation charter for recommendations 1, 2, & 3: Staff will circulate the implementation charter on the mailing list for a two-week consensus call. (DONE – CLOSING 24 MAY) Action Item 2: revised implementation charter for recommendations 20 and 21: Staff will amend the charter based on the discussion on today’s call and circulate it for a two-week consensus call. (DONE – CLOSING 24 MAY) Action Item 3: GNSO Council Update: Staff will circulate the revised version of the slides for a 24-hour review, and then send the update to the GNSO Council on behalf of the GNSO Review WG on Friday, 10 May. (DONE – SENT TO COUNCIL) Action Item 4: Diversity Recommendations 6, 33, 35, and 36: Staff will draft an implementation charter for review. (DONE – ATTACHED)

1 0

REMINDER-CONSENSUS CALL: Recommendations 20 & 21 Implementation Charter
by Julie Hedlund May 21, 2018

May 21, 2018

Dear GNSO Review Working Group members, This is a Consensus Call for the GNSO Review Implementation Charter for Recommendations 20 & 21, per the action items from the meeting on 10 May. The redlines in the document reflect the agreed-upon changes during the meeting. As noted in the attached charter, these are the recommendations for implementation: Recommendation 20: That the GNSO Council should review annually ICANN’s Strategic Objectives with a view to planning future policy development that strikes a balance between ICANN’s Strategic Objectives and the GNSO resources available for policy development.  Recommendation 21: That the GNSO Council should regularly undertake or commission analysis of trends in gTLDs in order to forecast likely requirements for policy and to ensure those affected are well- represented in the policy-making process. Staff is circulating the revised version of the charter for a two-week Consensus Call to end on Thursday, 24 May 2018. If there are no objections the recommendation will be deemed to have been implemented by Full Consensus. Best regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director

1 0

REMINDER-CONSENSUS CALL: Recommendations 1, 2, & 3 Implementation Charter
by Julie Hedlund May 21, 2018

May 21, 2018

Dear GNSO Review Working Group members, This is a Consensus Call for the GNSO Review Implementation Charter for Recommendations 1, 2, & 3 per the action items from the meeting on 10 May. Note that there were no comments on the version that was sent for review on 26 April. As noted in the attached charter, these are the recommendations for implementation: Recommendation 1: That the GNSO develop and monitor metrics to evaluate the ongoing effectiveness of current outreach strategies and pilot programs with regard to GNSO Working Groups. Recommendation 2: That the GNSO develop and fund more targeted programs to recruit volunteers and broaden participation in PDP Working Groups, given the vital role volunteers play in Working Groups and policy development. Recommendation 3: That the GNSO Council reduce or remove cost barriers to volunteer participation in Working Groups. Staff is circulating the final version of the charter for a two-week Consensus Call to end on Thursday, 24 May 2018. If there are no objections the recommendation will be deemed to have been implemented by Full Consensus. Best regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director

1 0

Re: [Gnso-review-wg] FOR 24-HOUR REVIEW: GNSO Council Update
by Julie Hedlund May 11, 2018

May 11, 2018

Dear GNSO Review Working Group members, As the time has passed for comments, staff will send the update to the GNSO Council list on behalf of the Working Group. Thank you very much and I hope you all have a nice weekend. Best, Julie From: Gnso-review-wg <gnso-review-wg-bounces(a)icann.org> on behalf of Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund(a)icann.org> Date: Thursday, May 10, 2018 at 12:05 PM To: "gnso-review-wg(a)icann.org" <gnso-review-wg(a)icann.org> Subject: [Gnso-review-wg] FOR 24-HOUR REVIEW: GNSO Council Update Dear GNSO Review Working Group members, Per action item 3 below, please see the attached revised slides for the GNSO Review Working Group Update to the GNSO Council on 24 May. This revised version includes the following changes: Slide 2: Corrected to reflect that there are 8 recommendations with dependencies. Slide 3: Revised the language under recommendation 20 to reflect the agreed approach from today’s call, and to make it consistent with the language in the implementation charter that is out for a consensus call. Please note: Because the slides are due not later than, and ideally before, the document and motion deadline of Monday, 14 May, we ask that you provide comments if any by 1600 UTC tomorrow, Friday, 11 May. Best regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director Action Items and Notes GNSO Review Working Group Meeting on Thursday, 10 May 2018 at 13:00 UTC Action Items: Action Item 1: implementation charter for recommendations 1, 2, & 3: Staff will circulate the implementation charter on the mailing list for a two-week consensus call. Action Item 2: revised implementation charter for recommendations 20 and 21: Staff will amend the charter based on the discussion on today’s call and circulate it for a two-week consensus call. Action Item 3: GNSO Council Update: Staff will circulate the revised version of the slides for a 24-hour review, and then send the update to the GNSO Council on behalf of the GNSO Review WG on Friday, 10 May. Action Item 4: Diversity Recommendations 6, 33, 35, and 36: Staff will draft an implementation charter for review. Notes: 1. Review agenda/SOIs: No updates to SOIs. 2. Discussion of the revised implementation charter for recommendations 1, 2, & 3: Staff notes that there were no further comments on the revised charter, so staff will take the action to send this version out for a two-week consensus call. 3. Discussion of the revised implementation charter for recommendations 20 and 21: -- Staff notes comments on the list raising concerns about expanding the SCBO charter and the need for the GNSO Council to take ownership of this activity. -- SCBO: There is a review of the charter to see if it will continue. As to best practices coming out of the SCBO – we were more focused on the actual budget and the numbers behind that budget. What we didn’t do and didn’t have the time to do was to review in detail the changes to the strategic plan for that fiscal year. Each fiscal year each one of the 5 objectives remain the same and the goals under them remain the same. What does change is the portfolios and projects that feed into that plan. These are more dynamic from one fiscal year to the next. When the SCBO reconvenes we will offer for the group to consider how those projects meet those goals. -- Thinking about a way of how to review the strategic objectives. In the Council usually if there is something to be done that may take something more time to prepare it is trying to put it on a kind of team. It is clear that it is the Council in the end who is responsible to review in the end. The question is how to make it practical, how to do that? Does the staff do preparatory work and then finalized in a strategic meeting? Or that there is some preparatory work to be done by the community or a working team out of the Council. If a team is needed why not use the SCBO to do that because it is representative – but we could invite other people who are interested. The Council should have a discussion whether we should go this way or not. Shall we come up with that recommendation? We could recommend it and also put in some arguments that have been discussed here in our group. -- Reserved about the idea of using the SCBO. For this year they drafted two comments. We cannot really try to expand or add more tasks to a standing committee. The Council needs to take the ownership. There is more discussion about strategic planning. There is a focus to do better planning. There will be outlook planning in Panama. It is up to the Council to delegate such a task, but the GNSO Review WG should not try to push a particular direction. We could suggest alternatives – pros and cons. -- Bring up pros and cons in the charter and reflect the discussions. -- And while not directly related to this exercise, I will also remind the group that ICANN Or and the community will be starting its NEW 5 Year Strat Planning cycle. The GNSO and Council should anticpate to be heavily involved to help shape the objectives and goals for the organization.....and as here ensure they fit the policy development mandate for the GNSO. -- from Rafik Dammak to All Participants: the trends outlook exercise managed by MSSI is involving council and SG/C separately. -- The new cycle is to pave the way for the Council to follow what is going to happen with the 5-year cycle. -- The charter could just indicate that the Council will undertake an annual review of its – see several ways on how to do it 1) existing team like the SCBO; 2) or at Council level; 3) staff preparation and addressed by Council and MSSI. -- Staff will update the determination in the charter to reflect the discussion on today’s call (see above). 4. Recommendations 6, 33, 35, and 36 on Diversity and Links to CCWG-Accountability Recommendations -- Recommendation 35 – would be duplicative of what was done in the CCWG-Accountability. We really tried to consult thoroughly with the SOs/ACs. -- Recommendation 8 from the CCWG-Accountability – creating diversity section of the ICANN web site. Not sure if we should create something on the GNSO web site. Need to see how we can link to this. Maybe at some level the work needs to be done at the whole ICANN. -- CCWG-Accountability final report needs to be approved by the GNSO and by the Board. 5. Discussion of the update to the GNSO Council on 24 May: -- Edits: Correct slide 2 to reflect 8 recommendations with dependencies and slide 3 on Recommendation 20 to reflect the discussion on today’s call. -- Send revised version for final review and send to the GNSO Council by Friday, 11 May. 6. Next Meeting: 24 May 1300 UTC: Staff will send implementation charters for recommendations relating to diversity (6, 33, 35, 36) and Statements of Interest/GDPR (26, 27, 28, 29) 7. AOB: None.

1 0

Recordings, attendance & Webex Chat | GNSO Review WG Call | Thursday, 10 May 2018 at 13:00 UTC
by Andrea Glandon May 10, 2018

May 10, 2018

Dear All, Please find the MP3 and attendance below and Webex chat attached for the GNSO Review Working Group held on Thursday, 10 May 2018 at 13:00 UTC. MP3: https://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-review-10may18-en.mp3 <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__audio.icann.org_gnso_g…> The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page: http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_group…> Mailing list archives: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-review-wg/ Wiki agenda page: https://community.icann.org/x/FQ8FBQ Attendance Members: Jennifer Wolfe (RySG Primary) Sara Bockey (RrSG Primary) Wolf-Ulrich Knoben (ISPCP Primary) Rafik Dammak (NCSG Primary) Lori Schulman (IPC Primary) Participants: None On Audio Only: Lawrence OlaWale-Roberts (BC primary) Apologies: Marika Konings (Staff) Emily Barabas (Staff) ICANN Staff: Julie Hedlund Berry Cobb Andrea Glandon **Please let me know if your name has been left off of the list** Thank you. Kind Regards, Andrea Glandon

1 0

FOR 24-HOUR REVIEW: GNSO Council Update
by Julie Hedlund May 10, 2018

May 10, 2018

Dear GNSO Review Working Group members, Per action item 3 below, please see the attached revised slides for the GNSO Review Working Group Update to the GNSO Council on 24 May. This revised version includes the following changes: Slide 2: Corrected to reflect that there are 8 recommendations with dependencies. Slide 3: Revised the language under recommendation 20 to reflect the agreed approach from today’s call, and to make it consistent with the language in the implementation charter that is out for a consensus call. Please note: Because the slides are due not later than, and ideally before, the document and motion deadline of Monday, 14 May, we ask that you provide comments if any by 1600 UTC tomorrow, Friday, 11 May. Best regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director Action Items and Notes GNSO Review Working Group Meeting on Thursday, 10 May 2018 at 13:00 UTC Action Items: Action Item 1: implementation charter for recommendations 1, 2, & 3: Staff will circulate the implementation charter on the mailing list for a two-week consensus call. Action Item 2: revised implementation charter for recommendations 20 and 21: Staff will amend the charter based on the discussion on today’s call and circulate it for a two-week consensus call. Action Item 3: GNSO Council Update: Staff will circulate the revised version of the slides for a 24-hour review, and then send the update to the GNSO Council on behalf of the GNSO Review WG on Friday, 10 May. Action Item 4: Diversity Recommendations 6, 33, 35, and 36: Staff will draft an implementation charter for review. Notes: 1. Review agenda/SOIs: No updates to SOIs. 2. Discussion of the revised implementation charter for recommendations 1, 2, & 3: Staff notes that there were no further comments on the revised charter, so staff will take the action to send this version out for a two-week consensus call. 3. Discussion of the revised implementation charter for recommendations 20 and 21: -- Staff notes comments on the list raising concerns about expanding the SCBO charter and the need for the GNSO Council to take ownership of this activity. -- SCBO: There is a review of the charter to see if it will continue. As to best practices coming out of the SCBO – we were more focused on the actual budget and the numbers behind that budget. What we didn’t do and didn’t have the time to do was to review in detail the changes to the strategic plan for that fiscal year. Each fiscal year each one of the 5 objectives remain the same and the goals under them remain the same. What does change is the portfolios and projects that feed into that plan. These are more dynamic from one fiscal year to the next. When the SCBO reconvenes we will offer for the group to consider how those projects meet those goals. -- Thinking about a way of how to review the strategic objectives. In the Council usually if there is something to be done that may take something more time to prepare it is trying to put it on a kind of team. It is clear that it is the Council in the end who is responsible to review in the end. The question is how to make it practical, how to do that? Does the staff do preparatory work and then finalized in a strategic meeting? Or that there is some preparatory work to be done by the community or a working team out of the Council. If a team is needed why not use the SCBO to do that because it is representative – but we could invite other people who are interested. The Council should have a discussion whether we should go this way or not. Shall we come up with that recommendation? We could recommend it and also put in some arguments that have been discussed here in our group. -- Reserved about the idea of using the SCBO. For this year they drafted two comments. We cannot really try to expand or add more tasks to a standing committee. The Council needs to take the ownership. There is more discussion about strategic planning. There is a focus to do better planning. There will be outlook planning in Panama. It is up to the Council to delegate such a task, but the GNSO Review WG should not try to push a particular direction. We could suggest alternatives – pros and cons. -- Bring up pros and cons in the charter and reflect the discussions. -- And while not directly related to this exercise, I will also remind the group that ICANN Or and the community will be starting its NEW 5 Year Strat Planning cycle. The GNSO and Council should anticpate to be heavily involved to help shape the objectives and goals for the organization.....and as here ensure they fit the policy development mandate for the GNSO. -- from Rafik Dammak to All Participants: the trends outlook exercise managed by MSSI is involving council and SG/C separately. -- The new cycle is to pave the way for the Council to follow what is going to happen with the 5-year cycle. -- The charter could just indicate that the Council will undertake an annual review of its – see several ways on how to do it 1) existing team like the SCBO; 2) or at Council level; 3) staff preparation and addressed by Council and MSSI. -- Staff will update the determination in the charter to reflect the discussion on today’s call (see above). 4. Recommendations 6, 33, 35, and 36 on Diversity and Links to CCWG-Accountability Recommendations -- Recommendation 35 – would be duplicative of what was done in the CCWG-Accountability. We really tried to consult thoroughly with the SOs/ACs. -- Recommendation 8 from the CCWG-Accountability – creating diversity section of the ICANN web site. Not sure if we should create something on the GNSO web site. Need to see how we can link to this. Maybe at some level the work needs to be done at the whole ICANN. -- CCWG-Accountability final report needs to be approved by the GNSO and by the Board. 5. Discussion of the update to the GNSO Council on 24 May: -- Edits: Correct slide 2 to reflect 8 recommendations with dependencies and slide 3 on Recommendation 20 to reflect the discussion on today’s call. -- Send revised version for final review and send to the GNSO Council by Friday, 11 May. 6. Next Meeting: 24 May 1300 UTC: Staff will send implementation charters for recommendations relating to diversity (6, 33, 35, 36) and Statements of Interest/GDPR (26, 27, 28, 29) 7. AOB: None.

1 0

CONSENSUS CALL: Recommendations 20 & 21 Implementation Charter
by Julie Hedlund May 10, 2018

May 10, 2018

Dear GNSO Review Working Group members, This is a Consensus Call for the GNSO Review Implementation Charter for Recommendations 20 & 21, per the action items from the meeting on 10 May. The redlines in the document reflect the agreed-upon changes during the meeting. As noted in the attached charter, these are the recommendations for implementation: Recommendation 20: That the GNSO Council should review annually ICANN’s Strategic Objectives with a view to planning future policy development that strikes a balance between ICANN’s Strategic Objectives and the GNSO resources available for policy development.  Recommendation 21: That the GNSO Council should regularly undertake or commission analysis of trends in gTLDs in order to forecast likely requirements for policy and to ensure those affected are well- represented in the policy-making process. Staff is circulating the revised version of the charter for a two-week Consensus Call to end on Thursday, 24 May 2018. If there are no objections the recommendation will be deemed to have been implemented by Full Consensus. Best regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director

1 0

CONSENSUS CALL: Recommendations 1, 2, & 3 Implementation Charter
by Julie Hedlund May 10, 2018

May 10, 2018

Dear GNSO Review Working Group members, This is a Consensus Call for the GNSO Review Implementation Charter for Recommendations 1, 2, & 3 per the action items from the meeting on 10 May. Note that there were no comments on the version that was sent for review on 26 April. As noted in the attached charter, these are the recommendations for implementation: Recommendation 1: That the GNSO develop and monitor metrics to evaluate the ongoing effectiveness of current outreach strategies and pilot programs with regard to GNSO Working Groups. Recommendation 2: That the GNSO develop and fund more targeted programs to recruit volunteers and broaden participation in PDP Working Groups, given the vital role volunteers play in Working Groups and policy development. Recommendation 3: That the GNSO Council reduce or remove cost barriers to volunteer participation in Working Groups. Staff is circulating the final version of the charter for a two-week Consensus Call to end on Thursday, 24 May 2018. If there are no objections the recommendation will be deemed to have been implemented by Full Consensus. Best regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director

1 0