- Gnso-review-wg - lists.icann.org

Mp3, AC recording and attendance GNSO Review implementation plan webinar is scheduled for Thursday, 08 December 2016 at 14:00 UTC
by Terri Agnew Dec. 13, 2016

Dec. 13, 2016

Dear all, Please find the attendance of the call attached to this email and the MP3 and Adobe Connect recording below for the GNSO Review implementation plan webinar held on Thursday, 08 December 2016 at 14:00 UTC. MP3: https://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-review-08dec16-en.mp3 Adobe Connect Recording: https://participate.icann.org/p9p5iut6zcq/<https://participate.icann.org/p9p5iut6zcq/?OWASP_CSRFTOKEN=cd9a97fa0329f7d6…> The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page: http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_group…> Mailing list archives: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-review-wg/ Wiki page: https://community.icann.org/x/ZhmsAw ** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list ** Thank you. Kind regards, Terri ------------------------------- Adobe Connect chat transcript for 08 December 2016 Terri Agnew:Welcome to the GNSO Review implementation plan webinar held on Thursday, 08 December 2016 at 14:00 UTC for 60 minutes. Terri Agnew:agenda wiki page (with slides) https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_… Julf Helsingius:I am in a pretty noisy office, so I will probably not use the microphone. Terri Agnew:Thank you for this information Julf David Olive:Welcome Everyone Julie Hedlund:As this is a webinar we have no need for statements of interest. Julie Hedlund:That has been removed from the agenda. Stefania Milan:Hello everyone. Thanks for organizing this webminar James Bladel:Good so far! :) Amr Elsadr:My only comment is that this tool/table is incredibly helpful. Thanks. Julf Helsingius:Yes, this is really good for understanding the process. Thanks! James Bladel:Makes sense. Thank you. Julie Hedlund:@James: Also note that this is a suggested timeline. A more precise and likely compressed timeline will be developed in implementation. James Bladel:Got it. Amr Elsadr:I'm assuming that all of this is being communicated to the OEC. James Bladel:Agree, Wolf-Ulrich. We can highlight that in the motion and communicate it to the OEC Julie Hedlund:@Amr: Yes, we are in touch with the OEC and they were invited to attend this webinar also. Amr Elsadr:Thanks. David Olive:Thanks Jen and All Julf Helsingius:Thanks - appreciated! James Bladel:Thank you Jen & Wolf-Ulrich for lending us some of your time & expertise on this. Very helpful! Julie Hedlund:@Thanks Jen and all! Lawrence Olawale-Roberts:Thanks All Julie Hedlund:Happy holidays to all! Wolf-Ulrich Knoben:Thanks and bye Darcy Southwell:Thank you! James Bladel:Thanks all. Amr Elsadr:Thanks Jen..., for seeing this through over the past few years!! :) Amr Elsadr:Thanks all. Bye.

2 2

Multistakeholder Ethos Award 2017: Nominations
by Nathalie Peregrine Dec. 12, 2016

Dec. 12, 2016

https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2016-12-12-en Submit Nominations Via the Ethos Award Nomination Form<https://goo.gl/forms/sKJcUjdA5gT50Dl72> ICANN is pleased to announce the opening of the nomination period for ICANN's Multistakeholder Ethos Award. Launched in 2014 at ICANN50 in London, the Multistakeholder Ethos Award recognizes ICANNparticipants who have deeply invested in consensus-based solutions, acknowledging the importance of ICANN's multistakeholder model of Internet governance, and contributed in a substantive way to the higher interests of ICANN's organization and its community. The ideal recipient(s) will have served in roles in multiple ICANN working groups or committees and collaborated with more than one Supporting Organization and/or Advisory Committee in a significant capacity. Candidates for the award will demonstrate at least five years of participation in the ICANN Community. Candidates will be evaluated by a panel of community members appointed by the Chairs of each Supporting Organizations and Advisory Committees using a merit-based point system evaluated against three criteria: 1. Demonstrated ability to work across community lines with both familiar and unfamiliar ICANNStakeholders with the aim of consensus building and collaboration that substantiate ICANN's multistakeholder model; 2. Facilitator of dialogue and open discussion in a fair and collegial manner, through the spirit of collaboration as shown through empathy and demonstrating a sincere desire to engage with people from other backgrounds, cultures, and interests; and 3. Demonstrated additional devotional factors exhibited by time spent supporting ICANN's multistakeholder model and its overall effectiveness through volunteer service via working groups or committees. Please submit your nominations via this Nomination Form<https://goo.gl/forms/sKJcUjdA5gT50Dl72> including detailed information outlining why the nominee meets the award criteria. Any additional information in support of nominations and/or questions about the award process may be submitted via email at ethosaward2017(a)icann.org<mailto:ethosaward2017@icann.org>. Award recipient(s) will be announced in June 2017 at ICANN59 Johannesburg.For more insights on the award program, please consult the ICANN Community Wiki<https://community.icann.org/x/YyOAAw>. Submit Nominations Via the Ethos Award Nomination Form<https://goo.gl/forms/sKJcUjdA5gT50Dl72> ###

1 0

Final Implementation Plan and Motion
by Julie Hedlund Nov. 21, 2016

Nov. 21, 2016

Dear Jen, Wolf-Ulrich and GNSO Review WG members, Please see the attached Final Implementation Plan for delivery to the GNSO Council tomorrow, 21 November, which is the document and motion deadline for the GNSO Council meeting on 01 December. Also attached is a motion for GNSO Council consideration for adoption of the plan. Note that the edits suggested below by Wolf-Ulrich have been incorporated. Also, staff have added a sample possible Gantt timeline for the implementation of the Phase III medium and low priority recommendations. As noted in the document, these are sample possible timelines that will likely be altered during implementation, provided in accordance with the Board request for the implementation plan to contain realistic timelines. Wolf-Ulrich has agreed to convey the implementation plan and motion tomorrow on behalf of the GNSO Review WG. Best regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director From: <gnso-review-wg-bounces(a)icann.org> on behalf of Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund(a)icann.org> Date: Friday, November 18, 2016 at 4:16 PM To: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben(a)t-online.de>, "gnso-review-wg(a)icann.org" <gnso-review-wg(a)icann.org> Subject: [Gnso-review-wg] FOR REVIEW(2): Final Draft Implementation Plan Dear Wolf-Ulrich and GNSO WG members, Please see the attached revised version of the implementation plan with redlines reflecting the proposed edits below, in Word and PDF. Please let us know by COB today if there are any further changes. Kind regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director From: <gnso-review-wg-bounces(a)icann.org> on behalf of Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund(a)icann.org> Date: Friday, November 18, 2016 at 12:35 PM To: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben(a)t-online.de>, "gnso-review-wg(a)icann.org" <gnso-review-wg(a)icann.org> Subject: Re: [Gnso-review-wg] FOR REVIEW: Final Draft Implementation Plan Thanks so much Wolf-Ulrich. Those are very helpful changes. I’ll send a redlined version with your suggested edits a bit later today. Kind regards, Julie From: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben(a)t-online.de> Reply-To: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben(a)t-online.de> Date: Friday, November 18, 2016 at 12:27 PM To: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund(a)icann.org>, "gnso-review-wg(a)icann.org" <gnso-review-wg(a)icann.org> Subject: Re: [Gnso-review-wg] FOR REVIEW: Final Draft Implementation Plan Thanks Julie and all for the work done so far. I don’t have comments with respect how to handle the recommendations. Regarding the timeline I think corresponding colours should be used in the Gantt chart as for the phases (page 33). Maybe in the executive summary it is useful to explain as a target that the implementation should be finished appropriate time before the next GNSO review is supposed to be started (which will be in 2019). In addition, I wonder whether it is possible to explain in the summary how we’re going to deal with the budget question (e.g. still under consideration). Small typo on page 1 para 1: 2x “approved”. I’m ready to introduce a related motion to the next council meeting. Best regards Wolf-Ulrich From: Julie Hedlund Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2016 1:41 AM To: gnso-review-wg(a)icann.org Subject: [Gnso-review-wg] FOR REVIEW: Final Draft Implementation Plan Dear GNSO Review WG members, Per the highlighted action items below from today’s meeting, please see the attached Final Draft Implementation Plan for your review. The document is provided in redline and clean versions, and in Word and PDF. Please note that the redlines reflect both the changes captured during today’s call, and also further suggested edits by staff for grammar and consistency in the recommendations. Finally, staff has suggested some additional details to be added to the Executive Summary and Overview of Recommendations since the Background has been moved to an Annex. Action items: 1. Staff will produce a final draft implementation plan and send it to the WG on 15 November (DONE). 2. WG members should provide any final edits or comments on the plan by Friday, 18 November, which staff will incorporate into the final implementation plan. 3. Staff will produce a draft motion for Wolf-Ulrich Knoben to send to the GNSO Council along with the final implementation plan by the document and motion deadline of Monday, 21 November for the 01 December Council meeting. Please provide any final edits or comments as noted in the actions above by Friday, 18 November. Any edits or comments will be addressed in the final version of the plan that will be sent to the GNSO Council on Monday, 21 November. Thank you all for your assistance in this important process. Kind regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director _______________________________________________ Gnso-review-wg mailing list Gnso-review-wg(a)icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-review-wg

5 5

Re: [Gnso-review-wg] FOR REVIEW(2): Final Draft Implementation Plan
by Julie Hedlund Nov. 19, 2016

Nov. 19, 2016

Great – thanks Chuck! Best, Julie From: Chuck Gomes <cgomes(a)verisign.com> Date: Friday, November 18, 2016 at 7:23 PM To: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund(a)icann.org>, 'WUKnoben' <wolf-ulrich.knoben(a)t-online.de>, "'gnso-review-wg(a)icann.org'" <gnso-review-wg(a)icann.org> Subject: RE: FOR REVIEW(2): Final Draft Implementation Plan I see what my problem. In the Word version I didn’t notice that the top bar chart was deleted. Chuck From: Gomes, Chuck Sent: Friday, November 18, 2016 8:21 PM To: 'Julie Hedlund' <julie.hedlund(a)icann.org>; 'WUKnoben' <wolf-ulrich.knoben(a)t-online.de>; 'gnso-review-wg(a)icann.org' <gnso-review-wg(a)icann.org> Subject: RE: FOR REVIEW(2): Final Draft Implementation Plan On page 30, the two bar charts look the same except for colors of the bars. Chuck From: Gomes, Chuck Sent: Friday, November 18, 2016 8:16 PM To: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund(a)icann.org>; WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben(a)t-online.de>; gnso-review-wg(a)icann.org Subject: RE: FOR REVIEW(2): Final Draft Implementation Plan Thanks Julie. Chuck From: Julie Hedlund [mailto:julie.hedlund@icann.org] Sent: Friday, November 18, 2016 8:06 PM To: Gomes, Chuck <cgomes(a)verisign.com>; WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben(a)t-online.de>; gnso-review-wg(a)icann.org Subject: Re: FOR REVIEW(2): Final Draft Implementation Plan Hi Chuck, Per the recommendation, the GAC-GNSO Consultation Group has completed its work, so it is no longer functioning. See the wiki at: https://community.icann.org/x/phPRAg. The proposed implementation steps are for the GNSO Review WG to consider whether the CG’s recommendations have been implemented and, if so, whether they meet the requirement of recommendation 31, or if more work is needed. The top chart is a simple graphic showing how the phases overlap. The bottom chart is a suggested Gantt chart showing a more detailed timeline for implementation for each recommendation in phase one and two. Per Wolf-Urich’s suggestion, the colors in both charts match. Green = phase I and orange = phase II. But perhaps this isn’t clear enough and requires additional explanation? We can make further edits to add clarity to recommendation 31 and on the charts and are open to suggestions. Thanks so much, Julie From: Chuck Gomes <cgomes(a)verisign.com> Date: Friday, November 18, 2016 at 6:56 PM To: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund(a)icann.org>, WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben(a)t-online.de>, "gnso-review-wg(a)icann.org" <gnso-review-wg(a)icann.org> Subject: RE: FOR REVIEW(2): Final Draft Implementation Plan Regarding Rec. 31, is the ‘GAC-GNSO Consultation Group on GAC Early Engagement in the GNSO Policy Development Process’ is functioning? What is the difference between the two bar charts on page 30? Shouldn’t a color code legend be provided? Chuck From: gnso-review-wg-bounces(a)icann.org [mailto:gnso-review-wg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund Sent: Friday, November 18, 2016 5:17 PM To: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben(a)t-online.de>; gnso-review-wg(a)icann.org Subject: [Gnso-review-wg] FOR REVIEW(2): Final Draft Implementation Plan Dear Wolf-Ulrich and GNSO WG members, Please see the attached revised version of the implementation plan with redlines reflecting the proposed edits below, in Word and PDF. Please let us know by COB today if there are any further changes. Kind regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director From: <gnso-review-wg-bounces(a)icann.org> on behalf of Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund(a)icann.org> Date: Friday, November 18, 2016 at 12:35 PM To: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben(a)t-online.de>, "gnso-review-wg(a)icann.org" <gnso-review-wg(a)icann.org> Subject: Re: [Gnso-review-wg] FOR REVIEW: Final Draft Implementation Plan Thanks so much Wolf-Ulrich. Those are very helpful changes. I’ll send a redlined version with your suggested edits a bit later today. Kind regards, Julie From: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben(a)t-online.de> Reply-To: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben(a)t-online.de> Date: Friday, November 18, 2016 at 12:27 PM To: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund(a)icann.org>, "gnso-review-wg(a)icann.org" <gnso-review-wg(a)icann.org> Subject: Re: [Gnso-review-wg] FOR REVIEW: Final Draft Implementation Plan Thanks Julie and all for the work done so far. I don’t have comments with respect how to handle the recommendations. Regarding the timeline I think corresponding colours should be used in the Gantt chart as for the phases (page 33). Maybe in the executive summary it is useful to explain as a target that the implementation should be finished appropriate time before the next GNSO review is supposed to be started (which will be in 2019). In addition, I wonder whether it is possible to explain in the summary how we’re going to deal with the budget question (e.g. still under consideration). Small typo on page 1 para 1: 2x “approved”. I’m ready to introduce a related motion to the next council meeting. Best regards Wolf-Ulrich From: Julie Hedlund Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2016 1:41 AM To: gnso-review-wg(a)icann.org Subject: [Gnso-review-wg] FOR REVIEW: Final Draft Implementation Plan Dear GNSO Review WG members, Per the highlighted action items below from today’s meeting, please see the attached Final Draft Implementation Plan for your review. The document is provided in redline and clean versions, and in Word and PDF. Please note that the redlines reflect both the changes captured during today’s call, and also further suggested edits by staff for grammar and consistency in the recommendations. Finally, staff has suggested some additional details to be added to the Executive Summary and Overview of Recommendations since the Background has been moved to an Annex. Action items: 1. Staff will produce a final draft implementation plan and send it to the WG on 15 November (DONE). 2. WG members should provide any final edits or comments on the plan by Friday, 18 November, which staff will incorporate into the final implementation plan. 3. Staff will produce a draft motion for Wolf-Ulrich Knoben to send to the GNSO Council along with the final implementation plan by the document and motion deadline of Monday, 21 November for the 01 December Council meeting. Please provide any final edits or comments as noted in the actions above by Friday, 18 November. Any edits or comments will be addressed in the final version of the plan that will be sent to the GNSO Council on Monday, 21 November. Thank you all for your assistance in this important process. Kind regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director _______________________________________________ Gnso-review-wg mailing list Gnso-review-wg(a)icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-review-wg

1 0

Re: [Gnso-review-wg] FOR REVIEW(2): Final Draft Implementation Plan
by Julie Hedlund Nov. 19, 2016

Nov. 19, 2016

Hi Chuck, Per the recommendation, the GAC-GNSO Consultation Group has completed its work, so it is no longer functioning. See the wiki at: https://community.icann.org/x/phPRAg. The proposed implementation steps are for the GNSO Review WG to consider whether the CG’s recommendations have been implemented and, if so, whether they meet the requirement of recommendation 31, or if more work is needed. The top chart is a simple graphic showing how the phases overlap. The bottom chart is a suggested Gantt chart showing a more detailed timeline for implementation for each recommendation in phase one and two. Per Wolf-Urich’s suggestion, the colors in both charts match. Green = phase I and orange = phase II. But perhaps this isn’t clear enough and requires additional explanation? We can make further edits to add clarity to recommendation 31 and on the charts and are open to suggestions. Thanks so much, Julie From: Chuck Gomes <cgomes(a)verisign.com> Date: Friday, November 18, 2016 at 6:56 PM To: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund(a)icann.org>, WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben(a)t-online.de>, "gnso-review-wg(a)icann.org" <gnso-review-wg(a)icann.org> Subject: RE: FOR REVIEW(2): Final Draft Implementation Plan Regarding Rec. 31, is the ‘GAC-GNSO Consultation Group on GAC Early Engagement in the GNSO Policy Development Process’ is functioning? What is the difference between the two bar charts on page 30? Shouldn’t a color code legend be provided? Chuck From: gnso-review-wg-bounces(a)icann.org [mailto:gnso-review-wg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund Sent: Friday, November 18, 2016 5:17 PM To: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben(a)t-online.de>; gnso-review-wg(a)icann.org Subject: [Gnso-review-wg] FOR REVIEW(2): Final Draft Implementation Plan Dear Wolf-Ulrich and GNSO WG members, Please see the attached revised version of the implementation plan with redlines reflecting the proposed edits below, in Word and PDF. Please let us know by COB today if there are any further changes. Kind regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director From: <gnso-review-wg-bounces(a)icann.org> on behalf of Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund(a)icann.org> Date: Friday, November 18, 2016 at 12:35 PM To: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben(a)t-online.de>, "gnso-review-wg(a)icann.org" <gnso-review-wg(a)icann.org> Subject: Re: [Gnso-review-wg] FOR REVIEW: Final Draft Implementation Plan Thanks so much Wolf-Ulrich. Those are very helpful changes. I’ll send a redlined version with your suggested edits a bit later today. Kind regards, Julie From: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben(a)t-online.de> Reply-To: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben(a)t-online.de> Date: Friday, November 18, 2016 at 12:27 PM To: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund(a)icann.org>, "gnso-review-wg(a)icann.org" <gnso-review-wg(a)icann.org> Subject: Re: [Gnso-review-wg] FOR REVIEW: Final Draft Implementation Plan Thanks Julie and all for the work done so far. I don’t have comments with respect how to handle the recommendations. Regarding the timeline I think corresponding colours should be used in the Gantt chart as for the phases (page 33). Maybe in the executive summary it is useful to explain as a target that the implementation should be finished appropriate time before the next GNSO review is supposed to be started (which will be in 2019). In addition, I wonder whether it is possible to explain in the summary how we’re going to deal with the budget question (e.g. still under consideration). Small typo on page 1 para 1: 2x “approved”. I’m ready to introduce a related motion to the next council meeting. Best regards Wolf-Ulrich From: Julie Hedlund Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2016 1:41 AM To: gnso-review-wg(a)icann.org Subject: [Gnso-review-wg] FOR REVIEW: Final Draft Implementation Plan Dear GNSO Review WG members, Per the highlighted action items below from today’s meeting, please see the attached Final Draft Implementation Plan for your review. The document is provided in redline and clean versions, and in Word and PDF. Please note that the redlines reflect both the changes captured during today’s call, and also further suggested edits by staff for grammar and consistency in the recommendations. Finally, staff has suggested some additional details to be added to the Executive Summary and Overview of Recommendations since the Background has been moved to an Annex. Action items: 1. Staff will produce a final draft implementation plan and send it to the WG on 15 November (DONE). 2. WG members should provide any final edits or comments on the plan by Friday, 18 November, which staff will incorporate into the final implementation plan. 3. Staff will produce a draft motion for Wolf-Ulrich Knoben to send to the GNSO Council along with the final implementation plan by the document and motion deadline of Monday, 21 November for the 01 December Council meeting. Please provide any final edits or comments as noted in the actions above by Friday, 18 November. Any edits or comments will be addressed in the final version of the plan that will be sent to the GNSO Council on Monday, 21 November. Thank you all for your assistance in this important process. Kind regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director _______________________________________________ Gnso-review-wg mailing list Gnso-review-wg(a)icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-review-wg

1 0

FOR REVIEW(2): Final Draft Implementation Plan
by Julie Hedlund Nov. 18, 2016

Nov. 18, 2016

Dear Wolf-Ulrich and GNSO WG members, Please see the attached revised version of the implementation plan with redlines reflecting the proposed edits below, in Word and PDF. Please let us know by COB today if there are any further changes. Kind regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director From: <gnso-review-wg-bounces(a)icann.org> on behalf of Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund(a)icann.org> Date: Friday, November 18, 2016 at 12:35 PM To: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben(a)t-online.de>, "gnso-review-wg(a)icann.org" <gnso-review-wg(a)icann.org> Subject: Re: [Gnso-review-wg] FOR REVIEW: Final Draft Implementation Plan Thanks so much Wolf-Ulrich. Those are very helpful changes. I’ll send a redlined version with your suggested edits a bit later today. Kind regards, Julie From: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben(a)t-online.de> Reply-To: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben(a)t-online.de> Date: Friday, November 18, 2016 at 12:27 PM To: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund(a)icann.org>, "gnso-review-wg(a)icann.org" <gnso-review-wg(a)icann.org> Subject: Re: [Gnso-review-wg] FOR REVIEW: Final Draft Implementation Plan Thanks Julie and all for the work done so far. I don’t have comments with respect how to handle the recommendations. Regarding the timeline I think corresponding colours should be used in the Gantt chart as for the phases (page 33). Maybe in the executive summary it is useful to explain as a target that the implementation should be finished appropriate time before the next GNSO review is supposed to be started (which will be in 2019). In addition, I wonder whether it is possible to explain in the summary how we’re going to deal with the budget question (e.g. still under consideration). Small typo on page 1 para 1: 2x “approved”. I’m ready to introduce a related motion to the next council meeting. Best regards Wolf-Ulrich From: Julie Hedlund Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2016 1:41 AM To: gnso-review-wg(a)icann.org Subject: [Gnso-review-wg] FOR REVIEW: Final Draft Implementation Plan Dear GNSO Review WG members, Per the highlighted action items below from today’s meeting, please see the attached Final Draft Implementation Plan for your review. The document is provided in redline and clean versions, and in Word and PDF. Please note that the redlines reflect both the changes captured during today’s call, and also further suggested edits by staff for grammar and consistency in the recommendations. Finally, staff has suggested some additional details to be added to the Executive Summary and Overview of Recommendations since the Background has been moved to an Annex. Action items: 1. Staff will produce a final draft implementation plan and send it to the WG on 15 November (DONE). 2. WG members should provide any final edits or comments on the plan by Friday, 18 November, which staff will incorporate into the final implementation plan. 3. Staff will produce a draft motion for Wolf-Ulrich Knoben to send to the GNSO Council along with the final implementation plan by the document and motion deadline of Monday, 21 November for the 01 December Council meeting. Please provide any final edits or comments as noted in the actions above by Friday, 18 November. Any edits or comments will be addressed in the final version of the plan that will be sent to the GNSO Council on Monday, 21 November. Thank you all for your assistance in this important process. Kind regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director _______________________________________________ Gnso-review-wg mailing list Gnso-review-wg(a)icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-review-wg

1 0

FOR REVIEW: Final Draft Implementation Plan
by Julie Hedlund Nov. 18, 2016

Nov. 18, 2016

Dear GNSO Review WG members, Per the highlighted action items below from today’s meeting, please see the attached Final Draft Implementation Plan for your review. The document is provided in redline and clean versions, and in Word and PDF. Please note that the redlines reflect both the changes captured during today’s call, and also further suggested edits by staff for grammar and consistency in the recommendations. Finally, staff has suggested some additional details to be added to the Executive Summary and Overview of Recommendations since the Background has been moved to an Annex. Action items: 1. Staff will produce a final draft implementation plan and send it to the WG on 15 November (DONE). 2. WG members should provide any final edits or comments on the plan by Friday, 18 November, which staff will incorporate into the final implementation plan. 3. Staff will produce a draft motion for Wolf-Ulrich Knoben to send to the GNSO Council along with the final implementation plan by the document and motion deadline of Monday, 21 November for the 01 December Council meeting. Please provide any final edits or comments as noted in the actions above by Friday, 18 November. Any edits or comments will be addressed in the final version of the plan that will be sent to the GNSO Council on Monday, 21 November. Thank you all for your assistance in this important process. Kind regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director

3 4

Actions/Discussion Notes: 15 November Meeting
by Julie Hedlund Nov. 15, 2016

Nov. 15, 2016

Dear GNSO Review WG members, Please see below the discussion notes captured by staff from the meeting on 15 November. These high-level notes are designed to help WG members navigate through the content of the call and are not meant as a substitute for the recording or the transcript. The MP3, transcript, and chat are provided separately and are posted on the wiki at: https://community.icann.org/display/GRWG/2016-11-15+GNSO+Review+Working+Gro…. In addition, please see the wiki home page for your reference at: https://community.icann.org/display/GRWG/GNSO+Review+Working+Group+Home. Kind regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director Action items: 1. Staff will produce a final draft implementation plan and send it to the WG on 15 November. 2. WG members should provide any final edits or comments on the plan by Friday, 18 November, which staff will incorporate into the final implementation plan. 3. Staff will produce a draft motion for Wolf-Ulrich Knoben to send to the GNSO Council along with the final implementation plan by the document and motion deadline of Monday, 21 November for the 01 December Council meeting. Discussion Notes: Overarching question: Is there a final step for the GNSO Review WG to agree that the implementation is complete? The WG is the accountability mechanism. Rec 20: Comments? None. Rec 21: Add a timeline -- recurring basis. Regular reporting/updating to the GNSO Council at every ICANN meeting as a status report to the GNSO. Put on the GNSO agenda. Rec. 7: Comments? What are existing measures? There are some existing services, such as real-time translation (as being done in ALAC), determine costs -- cost-benefit analysis -- including an assessment of costs. Rec. 35: Comments? Overlap with Accountability WS2-Diversity. A first step might be to review ongoing efforts in relation to the same subject to determine whether a separate WG is needed. Ensure it is coordinated with what is being done in WS2. Link the creation of new WG to the outcome of diversity subgroup. Rec. 22: Comments? None. Rec. 1, 2, 3: Comments? None. Rec. 5&9: Comments? None. Rec. 12: Comments? None. Rec. 17: Comments? None. Rec. 4: Comments? None. Rec. 34: Comments? Avri Doria: 1. How do we define effectiveness? 2. We are not really doing this and I think that we are wiggling out of actually doing it with the way this is being 'done'. Rafik Dammak: Another element to have in mind for implementation -- use more standard times, such as UTC. Don’t favor a particular region. Care needs to be taken in how "effectiveness" is defined. Rec. 36: Comments? None. Timeframe: Is this reasonable? Provide more time for high-priority items (phase 2). Extend the timeframe to end of 2017.

1 0

REMINDER: Proposed Agenda: 15 November Meeting 1400 UTC
by Julie Hedlund Nov. 15, 2016

Nov. 15, 2016

REMINDER – the Correct time of the meeting is 1400 UTC TODAY (in 1 hour). From: <gnso-review-wg-bounces(a)icann.org> on behalf of Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund(a)icann.org> Date: Monday, November 14, 2016 at 10:58 AM To: "gnso-review-wg(a)icann.org" <gnso-review-wg(a)icann.org> Subject: [Gnso-review-wg] Proposed Agenda: 15 November Meeting 1300 UTC Dear GNSO Review WG members, Please see the proposed draft agenda below for our meeting tomorrow – Tuesday, 15 November at 1400 UTC (note change from previous meeting time;, see separate meeting invite). We will continue our discussion of the attached revised strawman draft of the implementation plan, beginning with Section 3.3 Phase 3: Medium and Low Priority Recommendations on page 18. Please see the attached revised strawman implementation plan in Word and PDF that incorporates the edits provided by the WG at the face-to-face meeting at ICANN57 in Hyderabad. Draft Agenda: 1. Roll Call/Statements of Interest 2. Review Agenda 3. Continue Discussion of Draft Implementation Plan Recommendations (see attached document), Section 3.3 Phase 3: Medium and Low Priority Recommendations on page 18 4. Next Steps Please see below the deadlines/goals: 21 November: Send to GNSO Council with motion for approval (document and motion deadline for 01 December GNSO Council meeting) 01 December: GNSO Council votes on plan approval, or defers the motion to approve 15 December: GNSO Council votes on plan approval (if deferred from 01 December) – last opportunity to meet deadline to deliver plan to the Board 31 December: Deadline to deliver plan to the Board of Directors per the Board resolution In light of the very short timeframe for consideration of this implementation plan, and given that edits thus far have been minor, WG members are encouraged to share THIS draft strawman with their Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies for comment, and to provide comments on the list or edits directly in the document. Kind regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director

2 2

Proposed Agenda: 15 November Meeting 1300 UTC
by Julie Hedlund Nov. 14, 2016

Nov. 14, 2016

Dear GNSO Review WG members, Please see the proposed draft agenda below for our meeting tomorrow – Tuesday, 15 November at 1400 UTC (note change from previous meeting time;, see separate meeting invite). We will continue our discussion of the attached revised strawman draft of the implementation plan, beginning with Section 3.3 Phase 3: Medium and Low Priority Recommendations on page 18. Please see the attached revised strawman implementation plan in Word and PDF that incorporates the edits provided by the WG at the face-to-face meeting at ICANN57 in Hyderabad. Draft Agenda: 1. Roll Call/Statements of Interest 2. Review Agenda 3. Continue Discussion of Draft Implementation Plan Recommendations (see attached document), Section 3.3 Phase 3: Medium and Low Priority Recommendations on page 18 4. Next Steps Please see below the deadlines/goals: 21 November: Send to GNSO Council with motion for approval (document and motion deadline for 01 December GNSO Council meeting) 01 December: GNSO Council votes on plan approval, or defers the motion to approve 15 December: GNSO Council votes on plan approval (if deferred from 01 December) – last opportunity to meet deadline to deliver plan to the Board 31 December: Deadline to deliver plan to the Board of Directors per the Board resolution In light of the very short timeframe for consideration of this implementation plan, and given that edits thus far have been minor, WG members are encouraged to share THIS draft strawman with their Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies for comment, and to provide comments on the list or edits directly in the document. Kind regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director

3 3