Thanks Julie, I suggest to swap agenda items 4. and 5. Regarding charter for Recs 26-29 I have the following questions/remarks: 1. Is the reference (https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/strategic-engagement-2013-10-10-en) made in the strategic alignment still valid? 2. Under "Solution", Rec. 26, 5. : "Do you participate in..." rather than "Do you believe you are participating in..."?? 3. Rec 26, 6.: seems to be just one question (not 2) 4. Rec 27: I wonder whether reference should be made to the future potential impact of GDPR implementation (could also be done under WG determination) 5. WG Determination, Rec. 26: last sentence seems to be not complete Looking forward to hearing you all later today. Best regards Wolf-Ulrich Am 15.11.2017 um 23:35 schrieb Julie Hedlund:
Dear GNSO Review Working Group members,
Please see below the draft agenda for the meeting on Thursday, 16 November at 12:00 UTC. Please also see the attached materials:
* a suggested work plan for Phase 2 and 3 recommendations; * a revision of the charter for recommendations 26-29 with suggestions from staff re: implementation (in redlined and clean versions)
Draft agenda:
1. Review agenda/SOIs 2. Update from ICANN60 – Briefing to GNSO Council on 01 November 3. Consensus Calls on Charter for Recommendations 10 and 11, and 18 – Ended 09 November 4. Work Plan for Phase 2 and 3 Recommendations 5. Discussion of revised charter for recommendations 26-29 6. Meeting schedule and participation (Reminders to SGs/Cs to confirm Primary & Alternate members?) 7. AOB
Best regards,
Julie
Julie Hedlund, Policy Director
_______________________________________________ Gnso-review-wg mailing list Gnso-review-wg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-review-wg