December 2017 - Gnso-rpm-data

Rotating Times for Meetings Beginning 05 January 2018
by Julie Hedlund Jan. 5, 2018

Jan. 5, 2018

Dear all, Here is an update concerning the following action item from our last meeting: -- The call on 22 December will be canceled. Staff will send a Doodle poll to determine the preference to fix the recurring day and time for the meetings starting the first week in January, including times on Thursday and Friday. The 22 December call was canceled. The Doodle poll was conducted and based on the results it appeared that it was preferable to rotate the times of the meetings between Thursdays and Fridays. The preferred times are Thursdays at 2200 UTC and Fridays at 1900 UTC. We’ll start with Friday, 05 January 2018 at 1900 UTC, as you may have seen from the invitation. Best Regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director

4 4

Recordings, attendance & AC Chat from Review of all Rights Protection Mechanisms (RPMs) Sub Team for Data call on Friday, 15 December 2017
by Terri Agnew Dec. 16, 2017

Dec. 16, 2017

Dear All, Please find the attendance and AC Chat of the call attached to this email. The MP3 and Adobe Connect recording are below for the Review of all Rights Protection Mechanisms (RPMs) Sub Team for Data call held Friday, 15 December 2017 at 17:00 UTC. MP3: https://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-rpm-review-15dec17-en.mp3 Adobe Connect recording: <https://participate.icann.org/p6jda1h8746/?OWASP_CSRFTOKEN=17e199abfa1fcf54 4e1069db42438778cb8fe907e0429b4cdb72a46f61efd41d> https://participate.icann.org/p6jda1h8746/ The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page: https://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar ** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list ** Mailing list archives: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-data/ Main wiki page for the working group: https://community.icann.org/x/wCWAAw Thank you. Kind regards, Terri

1 0

Updated - RPMs Data Request Table (Section 3, Page 15-18)
by Ariel Liang Dec. 15, 2017

Dec. 15, 2017

Dear All, Following today’s Sub Team call, staff have incorporated the edits / suggestions for Trademark and Owners survey questions (Section 3, Question 4-5, page 15-18) on the Google doc. Redline / track change is used so you could view the staff updates: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1EUXC03ccuYhRMa_X4hDCPrq88KkF6qBRkL6sCcN…. Clean copies (.doc, .pdf) are attached for reference. We note that there are further comments and changes in other sections of the Google doc (page 18 and onwards) but they have not been discussed by the Sub Team. We will produce clean copies that incorporate these further changes after they have been discussed in the subsequent Sub Team meetings. Thanks everyone! Have a great weekend, and happy holidays! Best Regards, Mary, Julie, Berry, and Ariel From: Ariel Liang <ariel.liang(a)icann.org> Date: Monday, December 11, 2017 at 1:46 PM To: "gnso-rpm-data(a)icann.org" <gnso-rpm-data(a)icann.org> Subject: Updated - RPMs Data Request Table (Section 3) Dear All, Following the Sub Team Call on the past Friday, staff have captured the edit / suggestions for Trademark and Brand Owners survey questions (Section 3) on the Google doc. Redline / track change is used so you could view the staff updates (page 14 and 15): https://docs.google.com/document/d/1EUXC03ccuYhRMa_X4hDCPrq88KkF6qBRkL6sCcN…. In addition, some general comments / instructions for the survey provider are noted on page 29. Best Regards, Mary, Julie, Berry, and Ariel From: Ariel Liang <ariel.liang(a)icann.org> Date: Friday, December 1, 2017 at 5:58 PM To: "gnso-rpm-data(a)icann.org" <gnso-rpm-data(a)icann.org> Subject: Updated - RPMs Data Request Table Dear All, Following today’s Sub Team Call, staff have captured the edit / suggestions for registry operator survey questions (Section 1) on the Google doc. Track change is used so you could view the staff updates: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1EUXC03ccuYhRMa_X4hDCPrq88KkF6qBRkL6sCcN… We will follow up on a glossary list that provides definition / reference of terms as an appendix to this table. Have a great weekend! Best Regards, Mary, Julie, Berry, and Ariel From: Gnso-rpm-data <gnso-rpm-data-bounces(a)icann.org> on behalf of Ariel Liang <ariel.liang(a)icann.org> Date: Friday, December 1, 2017 at 10:20 AM To: "gnso-rpm-data(a)icann.org" <gnso-rpm-data(a)icann.org> Subject: Re: [Gnso-rpm-data] RPMs Data Request Table - Data Questions & Anecdotal Questions Dear All, To facilitate the work in the Data Sub Team, we have converted the updated table (with split data and anecdotal questions) into a google doc. Invitation to comment has been sent to all members. You can also access the updated google doc via this link: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1EUXC03ccuYhRMa_X4hDCPrq88KkF6qBRkL6sCcN…<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_docume…> Kindly let us know if you have any issue accessing the document. Speak to you in a few hours. Best Regards, Mary, Julie, Berry, and Ariel From: Ariel Liang <ariel.liang(a)icann.org> Date: Monday, November 27, 2017 at 9:05 PM To: "gnso-rpm-data(a)icann.org" <gnso-rpm-data(a)icann.org> Subject: RPMs Data Request Table - Data Questions & Anecdotal Questions Dear All, I hope you had a relaxing weekend and a great Thanksgiving holiday for those who celebrated! As per action item for staff and in preparation for the next Data Sub Team call, we did the initial split of the suggested draft questions into anecdotal questions and data questions. Please find the document attached. The text is extracted directly from the original Google Doc. Staff did the split based on our interpretation that anecdotal questions seek opinions, views, and anecdotal evidence, and data questions solicit facts, data, and straightforward answers. We note that some suggested draft questions can be both data and anecdotal questions (e.g., questions for registrants/potential registrants in Section 4 and 5). We also note that some draft suggested questions are currently in note format and have not been completed in full sentences. The additional minor changes are as follows: * The original Column 1 indicating “Data Sources and Proposed Methodology” is removed; the text is relocated to the header row of the table to indicate the target of the survey. * The text introducing the survey is relocated to the header row. * Charter questions and the corresponding suggested draft questions are aligned in rows. * Some questions are reformatted (e.g., add bullets to options, separate sub questions). * Extra text is added to provide context to sub question, if it is split from its original question. * Minor edit is done to correct typos and add missing words. Thank you for your contribution and review, and welcome your feedback to the document. Best Regards, Mary, Julie, Berry, and Ariel

1 0

Action Items from 15 December RPM Data Sub Team Call
by Julie Hedlund Dec. 15, 2017

Dec. 15, 2017

Dear all, Below are the action items staff captured from the RPM Data Sub Team meeting today (15 December): Action Items: -- Staff will prepare a redline revised Google document and PDF based on the proposed edits below. -- Staff will research the purpose of the 30-day minimum Sunrise Period. -- The call on 22 December will be canceled. Staff will send a Doodle poll to determine the preference to fix the recurring day and time for the meetings starting the first week in January, including times on Thursday and Friday. Proposed Edits, Section 3, Survey of TM & Brand Owners, see: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1EUXC03ccuYhRMa_X4hDCPrq88KkF6qBRkL6sCcN… Charter question #4, page 15: Anecdotal question 3: Delete the question: "Do you believe registries will have any issue with this requirement?" Anecdotal question 4: New question: “Has your participation in Sunrise Period registration been affected by Registry Operator reservation of names? If so, how?” Data question 1: “Do you know if any of your trademarks have been reserved by any New gTLD Registry operators?” -- Change to, "Have you tried to register a name in sunrise and could not? Were you informed or do you know the reason for non-registration and if so what was it?” Might also add, “If you contacted the registry operator were you able to get the name released to register?" and "Could you give us an example of a name that you couldn't register in the Sunrise Period?" Perhaps also, "Were you able to get the name released to registration despite the first refusal?" or "What did they do if anything?” Maybe a follow up question is "Do you know if any of those were due to the string being on the reserved name list, if so please give specific examples." Data question 2: Delete the question: “Has your participation in Sunrise Period registration been affected by Registry Operator reservation of names? If so, how?” Charter question #5, page 17: -- Note that we need to identify the purpose as a preface to these questions. Action to staff: Research the purpose of the 30-day minimum. -- Also, there were two forms of Sunrise. Maybe we explain the two mechanisms for implementation and include a question, "Which of the forms do you believe gave trademark owners the best ability to participate?" -- We have data on how many of each that there were, but end date was more commonly offered, and we know which gTLD ran which. For numbers, we therefore know how many gTLDs did each type and total registrations in each. However, we cannot determine which names were registered when within either a start-date or end-date sunrise -- The question is whether or not the period was sufficient for a trademark owner to make a registration or not. Are we also trying to find out whether one was better? Not sure how to phrase the question if that is the case. Anecdotal question 1: Change to, "Do you think the 30-day minimum for a Sunrise Period provides a sufficient period for trademark owners to take advantage of the Sunrise Period?" Add a new question following or before question 1: "Did you attempt to register a name in a Sunrise Period and Sunrise was no longer available?" "If you were unable to register, if so, why?" "Were you confused about the ending date of the Sunrise Period registration window?" Anecdotal question 2: Seems to get subsumed if we rephrase question 1 and add new questions (above). Anecdotal question 3: Seems to be misleading. Anecdotal question 5: Add "why not?" Anecdotal question 6: Split into two questions, but note that we are just giving guidance to the survey designers. The notes from the call are posted to the Sub Team wiki space, together with the call recording, transcript and Adobe Connect chat and attendance records. Best Regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director

1 0

Re: [Gnso-rpm-data] Upcoming Meetings & Timing re: Action Items from 08 December RPM Data Sub Team Call
by J. Scott Evans Dec. 15, 2017

Dec. 15, 2017

I vote cancelling the call on the 22nd. [tps://inside.corp.adobe.com/content/dam/brandcenter/images/image002.gif] J. Scott Evans 408.536.5336 (tel) 345 Park Avenue, Mail Stop W11-544 Director, Trademarks 408.709.6162 (cell) San Jose, CA, 95110, USA Adobe. Make It an Experience. jsevans(a)adobe.com www.adobe.com From: Gnso-rpm-data <gnso-rpm-data-bounces(a)icann.org> on behalf of Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund(a)icann.org> Date: Friday, December 8, 2017 at 11:18 AM To: "gnso-rpm-data(a)icann.org" <gnso-rpm-data(a)icann.org> Subject: [Gnso-rpm-data] Upcoming Meetings & Timing re: Action Items from 08 December RPM Data Sub Team Call Dear all, Per the action item below staff seeks feedback from the Sub Team members at your earliest convenience on the following questions: 1. Timing of 15 December meeting: Do any Sub Team members have conflicts if the meeting is held at 1730 UTC (the time with the fewest conflicts from the Doodle and subsequent discussions)? Note that if there are significant conflicts staff can circulate another Doodle, but suggestions for alternate times also are welcome. 2. Timing of, or cancel, 22 December meeting: Do Sub Team members have conflicts with holding a meeting either at 1730 UTC or have a preference to cancel due to holiday travel? Thank you very much for your guidance. Kind regards, Julie From: Gnso-rpm-data <gnso-rpm-data-bounces(a)icann.org> on behalf of Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund(a)icann.org> Date: Friday, December 8, 2017 at 2:09 PM To: "gnso-rpm-data(a)icann.org" <gnso-rpm-data(a)icann.org> Subject: [Gnso-rpm-data] Action Items from 08 December RPM Data Sub Team Call Dear all, Below are the action items staff captured from the RPM Data Sub Team meeting today (08 December): Action Items: -- Staff will prepare a redline revised Google document based on the proposed edits below. -- Staff will send a message to the list asking whether 1730 UTC will work for 15 December and whether to have a call on 22 December. Proposed Edits, Section 3, Survey of TM & Brand Owners, start on page 14 in the Google doc (https://docs.google.com/document/d/1EUXC03ccuYhRMa_X4hDCPrq88KkF6qBRkL6sCcN…<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdocs.googl…>), Charter question #2: Page 14: -- Data question, fourth bullet, page 14 -- ask "Which ones?" Page 15: -- Anecdotal question, page 14/Data question, first bullet, page 15: Delete the sub-bullet and merge the question with the first bullet of page 15, as follows: "Did price impact your ability to seek Sunrise Period registration?" and sub-bullet "If so, how did it affect your decision?" -- Data question, second bullet, page 15: Change to "What was the price you paid?" instead of "If you remember the price please indicate what it was." -- Data question, third bullet, page 15: Delete the question and sub-bullet. The notes from the call are posted to the Sub Team wiki space, together with the call recording, transcript and Adobe Connect chat and attendance records. Best Regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director

4 3

Re: [Gnso-rpm-data] [Ext] Re: Upcoming Meetings & Timing re: Action Items from 08 December RPM Data Sub Team Call
by Julie Hedlund Dec. 14, 2017

Dec. 14, 2017

Thanks J. Scott and noted. Best, Julie From: "J. Scott Evans" <jsevans(a)adobe.com> Date: Thursday, December 14, 2017 at 12:13 PM To: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund(a)icann.org>, "gnso-rpm-data(a)icann.org" <gnso-rpm-data(a)icann.org> Subject: [Ext] Re: [Gnso-rpm-data] Upcoming Meetings & Timing re: Action Items from 08 December RPM Data Sub Team Call I vote cancelling the call on the 22nd. J. Scott Evans408.536.5336 (tel)345 Park Avenue, Mail Stop W11-544 Director, Trademarks408.709.6162 (cell)San Jose, CA, 95110, USA Adobe. Make It an Experience.jsevans(a)adobe.comwww.adobe.com From: Gnso-rpm-data <gnso-rpm-data-bounces(a)icann.org> on behalf of Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund(a)icann.org> Date: Friday, December 8, 2017 at 11:18 AM To: "gnso-rpm-data(a)icann.org" <gnso-rpm-data(a)icann.org> Subject: [Gnso-rpm-data] Upcoming Meetings & Timing re: Action Items from 08 December RPM Data Sub Team Call Dear all, Per the action item below staff seeks feedback from the Sub Team members at your earliest convenience on the following questions: Timing of 15 December meeting: Do any Sub Team members have conflicts if the meeting is held at 1730 UTC (the time with the fewest conflicts from the Doodle and subsequent discussions)? Note that if there are significant conflicts staff can circulate another Doodle, but suggestions for alternate times also are welcome. Timing of, or cancel, 22 December meeting: Do Sub Team members have conflicts with holding a meeting either at 1730 UTC or have a preference to cancel due to holiday travel? Thank you very much for your guidance. Kind regards, Julie From: Gnso-rpm-data <gnso-rpm-data-bounces(a)icann.org> on behalf of Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund(a)icann.org> Date: Friday, December 8, 2017 at 2:09 PM To: "gnso-rpm-data(a)icann.org" <gnso-rpm-data(a)icann.org> Subject: [Gnso-rpm-data] Action Items from 08 December RPM Data Sub Team Call Dear all, Below are the action items staff captured from the RPM Data Sub Team meeting today (08 December): Action Items: -- Staff will prepare a redline revised Google document based on the proposed edits below. -- Staff will send a message to the list asking whether 1730 UTC will work for 15 December and whether to have a call on 22 December. Proposed Edits, Section 3, Survey of TM & Brand Owners, start on page 14 in the Google doc (https://docs.google.com/document/d/1EUXC03ccuYhRMa_X4hDCPrq88KkF6qBRkL6sCcN…) Charter question #2: Page 14: -- Data question, fourth bullet, page 14 -- ask "Which ones?" Page 15: -- Anecdotal question, page 14/Data question, first bullet, page 15: Delete the sub-bullet and merge the question with the first bullet of page 15, as follows: "Did price impact your ability to seek Sunrise Period registration?" and sub-bullet "If so, how did it affect your decision?" -- Data question, second bullet, page 15: Change to "What was the price you paid?" instead of "If you remember the price please indicate what it was." -- Data question, third bullet, page 15: Delete the question and sub-bullet. The notes from the call are posted to the Sub Team wiki space, together with the call recording, transcript and Adobe Connect chat and attendance records. Best Regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director

1 0

Results re: REMINDER: Feedback requested (Upcoming Meetings & Timing re: Action Items from 08 December RPM Data Sub Team Call)
by Julie Hedlund Dec. 13, 2017

Dec. 13, 2017

Hi Kurt and RPM WG members, Many thanks to you and everyone who responded to our request for feedback on the timing of the next call! Per the responses there was a slight preference for holding the call at 1700 UTC. Also, per the responses thus far as to whether to hold a call on 22 December, at least one member may be traveling and a few others noted that while they could make it, it might be better to cancel. Kind regards, Julie, Mary, Berry, and Ariel From: Kurt Pritz <kurt(a)kjpritz.com> Date: Tuesday, December 12, 2017 at 7:57 PM To: Mary Wong <mary.wong(a)icann.org> Cc: "Dorrain, Kristine" <dorraink(a)amazon.com>, Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund(a)icann.org>, "gnso-rpm-data(a)icann.org" <gnso-rpm-data(a)icann.org> Subject: [Ext] Re: [Gnso-rpm-data] REMINDER: Feedback requested (Upcoming Meetings & Timing re: Action Items from 08 December RPM Data Sub Team Call) 1730 is fine for me. Earlier is generally not as good. Later is better. Kurt On Dec 12, 2017, at 2:31 PM, Mary Wong <mary.wong(a)icann.org> wrote: Hello again everyone, We’d like to confirm the time for the Data Sub Team call this Friday (15 December) – can we go ahead to confirm if it should be at 1730 UTC or some other time (e.g. 1700 UTC (earlier) or 1900 UTC (later))? We understand that earlier and later times present difficulties for J. Scott and Susan, respectively, and therefore will appreciate your guidance. Thank you! Cheers Mary, Julie, Ariel and Berry From: Gnso-rpm-data <gnso-rpm-data-bounces(a)icann.org> on behalf of "Dorrain, Kristine via Gnso-rpm-data" <gnso-rpm-data(a)icann.org> Reply-To: "Dorrain, Kristine" <dorraink(a)amazon.com> Date: Friday, December 8, 2017 at 15:56 To: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund(a)icann.org>, "gnso-rpm-data(a)icann.org" <gnso-rpm-data(a)icann.org> Subject: Re: [Gnso-rpm-data] Upcoming Meetings & Timing re: Action Items from 08 December RPM Data Sub Team Call Hi everyone, As I indicated in the original Doodle poll, I do have a conflict at 1800 on Fridays. I can sometimes miss it (like today) as I do want to accommodate others, especially Europe, but I’d prefer if 17:30 were not our “new normal.” I have doubts about my ability to make a call on Dec 22. I may be taking that day off. ^ I realize this is not very definitive and I’m sorry. Best, Kristine From: Gnso-rpm-data [mailto:gnso-rpm-data-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund Sent: Friday, December 08, 2017 11:18 AM To: gnso-rpm-data(a)icann.org Subject: [Gnso-rpm-data] Upcoming Meetings & Timing re: Action Items from 08 December RPM Data Sub Team Call Dear all, Per the action item below staff seeks feedback from the Sub Team members at your earliest convenience on the following questions: Timing of 15 December meeting: Do any Sub Team members have conflicts if the meeting is held at 1730 UTC (the time with the fewest conflicts from the Doodle and subsequent discussions)? Note that if there are significant conflicts staff can circulate another Doodle, but suggestions for alternate times also are welcome. Timing of, or cancel, 22 December meeting: Do Sub Team members have conflicts with holding a meeting either at 1730 UTC or have a preference to cancel due to holiday travel? Thank you very much for your guidance. Kind regards, Julie From: Gnso-rpm-data <gnso-rpm-data-bounces(a)icann.org> on behalf of Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund(a)icann.org> Date: Friday, December 8, 2017 at 2:09 PM To: "gnso-rpm-data(a)icann.org" <gnso-rpm-data(a)icann.org> Subject: [Gnso-rpm-data] Action Items from 08 December RPM Data Sub Team Call Dear all, Below are the action items staff captured from the RPM Data Sub Team meeting today (08 December): Action Items: -- Staff will prepare a redline revised Google document based on the proposed edits below. -- Staff will send a message to the list asking whether 1730 UTC will work for 15 December and whether to have a call on 22 December. Proposed Edits, Section 3, Survey of TM & Brand Owners, start on page 14 in the Google doc (https://docs.google.com/document/d/1EUXC03ccuYhRMa_X4hDCPrq88KkF6qBRkL6sCcN…) Charter question #2: Page 14: -- Data question, fourth bullet, page 14 -- ask "Which ones?" Page 15: -- Anecdotal question, page 14/Data question, first bullet, page 15: Delete the sub-bullet and merge the question with the first bullet of page 15, as follows: "Did price impact your ability to seek Sunrise Period registration?" and sub-bullet "If so, how did it affect your decision?" -- Data question, second bullet, page 15: Change to "What was the price you paid?" instead of "If you remember the price please indicate what it was." -- Data question, third bullet, page 15: Delete the question and sub-bullet. The notes from the call are posted to the Sub Team wiki space, together with the call recording, transcript and Adobe Connect chat and attendance records. Best Regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director _______________________________________________ Gnso-rpm-data mailing list Gnso-rpm-data(a)icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-data

1 0

REMINDER: Feedback requested (Upcoming Meetings & Timing re: Action Items from 08 December RPM Data Sub Team Call)
by Mary Wong Dec. 13, 2017

Dec. 13, 2017

Hello again everyone, We’d like to confirm the time for the Data Sub Team call this Friday (15 December) – can we go ahead to confirm if it should be at 1730 UTC or some other time (e.g. 1700 UTC (earlier) or 1900 UTC (later))? We understand that earlier and later times present difficulties for J. Scott and Susan, respectively, and therefore will appreciate your guidance. Thank you! Cheers Mary, Julie, Ariel and Berry From: Gnso-rpm-data <gnso-rpm-data-bounces(a)icann.org> on behalf of "Dorrain, Kristine via Gnso-rpm-data" <gnso-rpm-data(a)icann.org> Reply-To: "Dorrain, Kristine" <dorraink(a)amazon.com> Date: Friday, December 8, 2017 at 15:56 To: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund(a)icann.org>, "gnso-rpm-data(a)icann.org" <gnso-rpm-data(a)icann.org> Subject: Re: [Gnso-rpm-data] Upcoming Meetings & Timing re: Action Items from 08 December RPM Data Sub Team Call Hi everyone, As I indicated in the original Doodle poll, I do have a conflict at 1800 on Fridays. I can sometimes miss it (like today) as I do want to accommodate others, especially Europe, but I’d prefer if 17:30 were not our “new normal.” I have doubts about my ability to make a call on Dec 22. I may be taking that day off. ^ I realize this is not very definitive and I’m sorry. Best, Kristine From: Gnso-rpm-data [mailto:gnso-rpm-data-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund Sent: Friday, December 08, 2017 11:18 AM To: gnso-rpm-data(a)icann.org Subject: [Gnso-rpm-data] Upcoming Meetings & Timing re: Action Items from 08 December RPM Data Sub Team Call Dear all, Per the action item below staff seeks feedback from the Sub Team members at your earliest convenience on the following questions: 1. Timing of 15 December meeting: Do any Sub Team members have conflicts if the meeting is held at 1730 UTC (the time with the fewest conflicts from the Doodle and subsequent discussions)? Note that if there are significant conflicts staff can circulate another Doodle, but suggestions for alternate times also are welcome. 2. Timing of, or cancel, 22 December meeting: Do Sub Team members have conflicts with holding a meeting either at 1730 UTC or have a preference to cancel due to holiday travel? Thank you very much for your guidance. Kind regards, Julie From: Gnso-rpm-data <gnso-rpm-data-bounces(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-data-bounces@icann.org>> on behalf of Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund(a)icann.org<mailto:julie.hedlund@icann.org>> Date: Friday, December 8, 2017 at 2:09 PM To: "gnso-rpm-data(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-data@icann.org>" <gnso-rpm-data(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-data@icann.org>> Subject: [Gnso-rpm-data] Action Items from 08 December RPM Data Sub Team Call Dear all, Below are the action items staff captured from the RPM Data Sub Team meeting today (08 December): Action Items: -- Staff will prepare a redline revised Google document based on the proposed edits below. -- Staff will send a message to the list asking whether 1730 UTC will work for 15 December and whether to have a call on 22 December. Proposed Edits, Section 3, Survey of TM & Brand Owners, start on page 14 in the Google doc (https://docs.google.com/document/d/1EUXC03ccuYhRMa_X4hDCPrq88KkF6qBRkL6sCcN…<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_docume…>), Charter question #2: Page 14: -- Data question, fourth bullet, page 14 -- ask "Which ones?" Page 15: -- Anecdotal question, page 14/Data question, first bullet, page 15: Delete the sub-bullet and merge the question with the first bullet of page 15, as follows: "Did price impact your ability to seek Sunrise Period registration?" and sub-bullet "If so, how did it affect your decision?" -- Data question, second bullet, page 15: Change to "What was the price you paid?" instead of "If you remember the price please indicate what it was." -- Data question, third bullet, page 15: Delete the question and sub-bullet. The notes from the call are posted to the Sub Team wiki space, together with the call recording, transcript and Adobe Connect chat and attendance records. Best Regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director

7 6

Re: [Gnso-rpm-data] REMINDER: Feedback requested (Upcoming Meetings & Timing re: Action Items from 08 December RPM Data Sub Team Call)
by J. Scott Evans Dec. 12, 2017

Dec. 12, 2017

I can do either time this week as I am in Seattle and do not have to commute for an hour on the train. Perhaps 17:00 would be better for Susan. [tps://inside.corp.adobe.com/content/dam/brandcenter/images/image002.gif] J. Scott Evans 408.536.5336 (tel) 345 Park Avenue, Mail Stop W11-544 Director, Trademarks 408.709.6162 (cell) San Jose, CA, 95110, USA Adobe. Make It an Experience. jsevans(a)adobe.com www.adobe.com From: Gnso-rpm-data <gnso-rpm-data-bounces(a)icann.org> on behalf of Mary Wong <mary.wong(a)icann.org> Date: Tuesday, December 12, 2017 at 2:31 PM To: "Dorrain, Kristine" <dorraink(a)amazon.com>, Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund(a)icann.org>, "gnso-rpm-data(a)icann.org" <gnso-rpm-data(a)icann.org> Subject: [Gnso-rpm-data] REMINDER: Feedback requested (Upcoming Meetings & Timing re: Action Items from 08 December RPM Data Sub Team Call) Hello again everyone, We’d like to confirm the time for the Data Sub Team call this Friday (15 December) – can we go ahead to confirm if it should be at 1730 UTC or some other time (e.g. 1700 UTC (earlier) or 1900 UTC (later))? We understand that earlier and later times present difficulties for J. Scott and Susan, respectively, and therefore will appreciate your guidance. Thank you! Cheers Mary, Julie, Ariel and Berry From: Gnso-rpm-data <gnso-rpm-data-bounces(a)icann.org> on behalf of "Dorrain, Kristine via Gnso-rpm-data" <gnso-rpm-data(a)icann.org> Reply-To: "Dorrain, Kristine" <dorraink(a)amazon.com> Date: Friday, December 8, 2017 at 15:56 To: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund(a)icann.org>, "gnso-rpm-data(a)icann.org" <gnso-rpm-data(a)icann.org> Subject: Re: [Gnso-rpm-data] Upcoming Meetings & Timing re: Action Items from 08 December RPM Data Sub Team Call Hi everyone, As I indicated in the original Doodle poll, I do have a conflict at 1800 on Fridays. I can sometimes miss it (like today) as I do want to accommodate others, especially Europe, but I’d prefer if 17:30 were not our “new normal.” I have doubts about my ability to make a call on Dec 22. I may be taking that day off. ^ I realize this is not very definitive and I’m sorry. Best, Kristine From: Gnso-rpm-data [mailto:gnso-rpm-data-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund Sent: Friday, December 08, 2017 11:18 AM To: gnso-rpm-data(a)icann.org Subject: [Gnso-rpm-data] Upcoming Meetings & Timing re: Action Items from 08 December RPM Data Sub Team Call Dear all, Per the action item below staff seeks feedback from the Sub Team members at your earliest convenience on the following questions: 1. Timing of 15 December meeting: Do any Sub Team members have conflicts if the meeting is held at 1730 UTC (the time with the fewest conflicts from the Doodle and subsequent discussions)? Note that if there are significant conflicts staff can circulate another Doodle, but suggestions for alternate times also are welcome. 2. Timing of, or cancel, 22 December meeting: Do Sub Team members have conflicts with holding a meeting either at 1730 UTC or have a preference to cancel due to holiday travel? Thank you very much for your guidance. Kind regards, Julie From: Gnso-rpm-data <gnso-rpm-data-bounces(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-data-bounces@icann.org>> on behalf of Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund(a)icann.org<mailto:julie.hedlund@icann.org>> Date: Friday, December 8, 2017 at 2:09 PM To: "gnso-rpm-data(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-data@icann.org>" <gnso-rpm-data(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-rpm-data@icann.org>> Subject: [Gnso-rpm-data] Action Items from 08 December RPM Data Sub Team Call Dear all, Below are the action items staff captured from the RPM Data Sub Team meeting today (08 December): Action Items: -- Staff will prepare a redline revised Google document based on the proposed edits below. -- Staff will send a message to the list asking whether 1730 UTC will work for 15 December and whether to have a call on 22 December. Proposed Edits, Section 3, Survey of TM & Brand Owners, start on page 14 in the Google doc (https://docs.google.com/document/d/1EUXC03ccuYhRMa_X4hDCPrq88KkF6qBRkL6sCcN…<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Furldefense…>), Charter question #2: Page 14: -- Data question, fourth bullet, page 14 -- ask "Which ones?" Page 15: -- Anecdotal question, page 14/Data question, first bullet, page 15: Delete the sub-bullet and merge the question with the first bullet of page 15, as follows: "Did price impact your ability to seek Sunrise Period registration?" and sub-bullet "If so, how did it affect your decision?" -- Data question, second bullet, page 15: Change to "What was the price you paid?" instead of "If you remember the price please indicate what it was." -- Data question, third bullet, page 15: Delete the question and sub-bullet. The notes from the call are posted to the Sub Team wiki space, together with the call recording, transcript and Adobe Connect chat and attendance records. Best Regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director

1 0

Updated - RPMs Data Request Table (Section 3)
by Ariel Liang Dec. 11, 2017

Dec. 11, 2017

Dear All, Following the Sub Team Call on the past Friday, staff have captured the edit / suggestions for Trademark and Brand Owners survey questions (Section 3) on the Google doc. Redline / track change is used so you could view the staff updates (page 14 and 15): https://docs.google.com/document/d/1EUXC03ccuYhRMa_X4hDCPrq88KkF6qBRkL6sCcN…. In addition, some general comments / instructions for the survey provider are noted on page 29. Best Regards, Mary, Julie, Berry, and Ariel From: Ariel Liang <ariel.liang(a)icann.org> Date: Friday, December 1, 2017 at 5:58 PM To: "gnso-rpm-data(a)icann.org" <gnso-rpm-data(a)icann.org> Subject: Updated - RPMs Data Request Table Dear All, Following today’s Sub Team Call, staff have captured the edit / suggestions for registry operator survey questions (Section 1) on the Google doc. Track change is used so you could view the staff updates: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1EUXC03ccuYhRMa_X4hDCPrq88KkF6qBRkL6sCcN… We will follow up on a glossary list that provides definition / reference of terms as an appendix to this table. Have a great weekend! Best Regards, Mary, Julie, Berry, and Ariel From: Gnso-rpm-data <gnso-rpm-data-bounces(a)icann.org> on behalf of Ariel Liang <ariel.liang(a)icann.org> Date: Friday, December 1, 2017 at 10:20 AM To: "gnso-rpm-data(a)icann.org" <gnso-rpm-data(a)icann.org> Subject: Re: [Gnso-rpm-data] RPMs Data Request Table - Data Questions & Anecdotal Questions Dear All, To facilitate the work in the Data Sub Team, we have converted the updated table (with split data and anecdotal questions) into a google doc. Invitation to comment has been sent to all members. You can also access the updated google doc via this link: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1EUXC03ccuYhRMa_X4hDCPrq88KkF6qBRkL6sCcN…<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_docume…> Kindly let us know if you have any issue accessing the document. Speak to you in a few hours. Best Regards, Mary, Julie, Berry, and Ariel From: Ariel Liang <ariel.liang(a)icann.org> Date: Monday, November 27, 2017 at 9:05 PM To: "gnso-rpm-data(a)icann.org" <gnso-rpm-data(a)icann.org> Subject: RPMs Data Request Table - Data Questions & Anecdotal Questions Dear All, I hope you had a relaxing weekend and a great Thanksgiving holiday for those who celebrated! As per action item for staff and in preparation for the next Data Sub Team call, we did the initial split of the suggested draft questions into anecdotal questions and data questions. Please find the document attached. The text is extracted directly from the original Google Doc. Staff did the split based on our interpretation that anecdotal questions seek opinions, views, and anecdotal evidence, and data questions solicit facts, data, and straightforward answers. We note that some suggested draft questions can be both data and anecdotal questions (e.g., questions for registrants/potential registrants in Section 4 and 5). We also note that some draft suggested questions are currently in note format and have not been completed in full sentences. The additional minor changes are as follows: * The original Column 1 indicating “Data Sources and Proposed Methodology” is removed; the text is relocated to the header row of the table to indicate the target of the survey. * The text introducing the survey is relocated to the header row. * Charter questions and the corresponding suggested draft questions are aligned in rows. * Some questions are reformatted (e.g., add bullets to options, separate sub questions). * Extra text is added to provide context to sub question, if it is split from its original question. * Minor edit is done to correct typos and add missing words. Thank you for your contribution and review, and welcome your feedback to the document. Best Regards, Mary, Julie, Berry, and Ariel

1 0