Dear WG members, Attached, please find my follow-up proposal on Question 8 that stems from our most recent WG meetings, and the discussions of the 'small team' that formed following last week's full WG call. While the small team was not able to produce a unified compromise proposal, in my personal opinion, progress was made, and the proposal I am posting here (attached as a WORD doc) and Rebecca's proposal, mostly align, with a few areas of divergence. I drafted this proposal under the impetus of compromise. With that said, I should note that there may be proponents of Proposal #2 (submitted by Jonathan Agmon), who may wish to express a statement in the Initial Report to reflect their specific views on this topic. Many thanks to staff for their excellent support. Best regards, Claudio On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 3:04 PM Tushnet, Rebecca <rtushnet@law.harvard.edu> wrote:
This is the same text but with the subject line proper.
Rebecca Tushnet Frank Stanton Professor of First Amendment Law, Harvard Law School 703 593 6759 _______________________________________________ GNSO-RPM-WG mailing list GNSO-RPM-WG@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.