Ill bite here. Answer: 0 (zero). Sunrise is not fit for its original purpose. Few legitimate trademarks are being submitted. There is evidence of abuse in sunrise registrations. More importantly, the notice process seems more than sufficient to address the legitimate concerns. Sent from my iPad
On 10 Aug 2017, at 19:25, claudio di gangi <ipcdigangi@gmail.com> wrote:
George,
I'm going to use an extreme example to illustrate my point.
If 1,000,000 new gTLDs are launched in the next round, how many Sunrise registrations do think there should be order to reach the "success" threshold?
Best, Claudio
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 12:50 PM George Kirikos <icann@leap.com> wrote: Hi again,
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 12:44 PM, George Kirikos <icann@leap.com> wrote:
with stats propped up with high counts of sub-$1 registrations, or even domains that are stuffed into the accounts of registrants of other TLDs (e.g. .xxx with NSI, or .kiwi).
Sorry, that was a typo. It should have been .XYZ with NSI, of course, not .XXX, e.g.
http://www.dnjournal.com/archive/lowdown/2014/dailyposts/20140605.htm
Sincerely,
George Kirikos 416-588-0269 http://www.leap.com/ _______________________________________________ gnso-rpm-wg mailing list gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg
gnso-rpm-wg mailing list gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rpm-wg