Dear all, Please find attached an updated version of the Trademark Claims document that was discussed on the Wednesday call. In addition to the new substantive edits that were made, based on the Action Items numbered 1, 2 and 3 from Amr’s notes (below), you will see the following changes: * We have removed the previous highlighting (since all the comments from ICANN59, which were highlighted previously, have already been discussed by the Working Group), and have highlighted (in yellow) only those new additions and edits from the call this week. * We have, however, retained most of the comments from either the last Sub Team call or the community discussions at ICANN59, in order to present a more complete picture of where the discussions stand currently. * In a few instances, we have placed what were previously comments (annotated in comment boxes and brought to the WG’s attention during the Wednesday discussion) into the main text. These include incorporating the IDN-related suggestions from Amadeo Abril from ICANN59 and rephrasing certain questions in light of specific requests directed toward further refining those particular questions. Where this has been done, we have indicated as much in a comment box. We hope you find the updates useful. Please review the updated document – as well as the updated document for Sunrise (circulated on Friday 14 July) – and provide your comments to this email list for further discussion. In the meantime, staff will continue to work with the co-chairs to develop a proposal for handling the various data collection requests, and update the Open TMCH Questions poll in accordance with the last Action Item (#4) from the Wednesday call. Thanks and cheers Mary From: <gnso-rpm-wg-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Amr Elsadr <amr.elsadr@icann.org> Date: Thursday, July 20, 2017 at 13:35 To: "gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org" <gnso-rpm-wg@icann.org> Subject: [gnso-rpm-wg] Action Items for GNSO Review of all RPMs for all gTLDS PDP WG Call - 19 July 2017 Dear Working Group Members, Below you will find the action items from yesterday’s WG call. The action items, notes, recordings, transcripts and meeting documents have all been posted on the meeting’s wiki page here: https://community.icann.org/x/c3vwAw[community.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_c3vwAw&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=DJ69mAe-idEhpAMF1nu2x6c2w3xl7xb5cjS_7sB4h6Y&m=VLdUaADNnNzi9Vej7FX-TwH9HPSVZ1DFgiPKFymKJbw&s=gnbsBZdWUql8KPsVenBRaP6r_1JpexiY36hXwvP4D-Q&e=> Thanks. Amr Action Items: 1. Staff to replace threshold question of Question 4 of Trademark Claims with: Is the exact match requirement on Trademark Claims serving the intended purposes of the Trademark Claims RPM? 2. Staff to updated Question 4 of Trademark Claims with the proposed question addressing IDN issues, and include additional examples provided by Amadeu Abril during WG face-to-face meeting in ICANN 59 3. Staff to propose a rewording of question 6 of Trademark Claims, and suggest where to place it – as a sub-question in question 2 or 3 4. Staff to provide a breakdown of responses for each question in the poll by stakeholder group, as responders identified themselves in the responses to Question 2 of the poll