All, in preparation for the meeting that is to be scheduled for next week, please take note of the outstanding action items: 1. TF members from the IPC, BC, and RySG (and others as they wish) to consult with their members concerning how they deal with disclosures of clients/relationships in other contexts and suggest revisions if any to the following language: “If professional ethical obligations prevent you from disclosing this information, please provide details on which ethical obligations prevent you from disclosing and provide a high level description of the entity that you are representing without disclosing its name, for example ‘I represent a Registry client’ or ‘I am representing a non-GNSO related entity.’” 2. DUE BY 9 January: TF members to review the following language from the revised SOI to confirm that it provides sufficient flexibility: “The detailed questions will be made publicly available and may be reviewed and revised by the GNSO Council from time to time using its relevant processes.” 3. DUE BY 9 January: TF members to suggest SOI Samples (see https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-i7oTXv_7eRibJK8a8FQ8Df9CCClWuH_/edit) intended to provide further guidance to those completing an SOI. As a reminder, the comments received during the public comment period have been captured here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/13jhExwduE7qrRovZFDw5FwAjtUlSffwz/edit - you can still include your views on how the TF should address those comments in the table at the bottom. Thanks, Julie & Marika