Hello Marika, If the proper way is to explicitly request 4 seat - calling this a consensus, and then rework this in case of GNSO Council denial to reach the new consensus for 3 seats (taking additional time and efforts), then I think we need to go with the text of the letter mentioning 4 seats (and I think we need Frederic to support to say that it was a consensus). Sincerely Yours, Maxim Alzoba Special projects manager, International Relations Department, FAITID m. +7 916 6761580 skype oldfrogger Current UTC offset: +3.00 (Moscow)
On Apr 19, 2017, at 18:01, Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org> wrote:
Hi Maxim,
Thanks for your feedback. My understanding was that if there would be no support by the GNSO Council for the approach proposed by the SSC (or by the SSC for that matter), Julf would withdraw the motion and request for additional time for the SSC to come to full consensus. This is something that Julf could also communicate if/when he submits the revised motion to the GNSO Council, but it does not seem that this needs to be called out in the motion itself as that is subject to an up or down vote. Does that make sense?
Best regards,
Marika
On 4/19/17, 08:45, "Maxim Alzoba" <m.alzoba@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello Marika,
Please find my comments in Google Doc & attached downloaded version.
P.s: My constituency is going to have a confcall in 15 minutes, and I hope to have their opinion by beginning of our confcall today.
Sincerely Yours,
Maxim Alzoba Special projects manager, International Relations Department, FAITID
m. +7 916 6761580 skype oldfrogger
Current UTC offset: +3.00 (Moscow)
On Apr 19, 2017, at 17:28, Novoa, Osvaldo <onovoa@Antel.com.uy> wrote:
Thank you Marika, I was waiting for comments from my constituency. I support this motion. Best regards, Osvaldo Novoa
-----Mensaje original----- De: gnso-ssc-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gnso-ssc-bounces@icann.org] En nombre de Marika Konings Enviado el: miércoles, 19 de abril de 2017 11:19 a.m. Para: Renata Aquino Ribeiro CC: gnso-ssc@icann.org Asunto: Re: [Gnso-ssc] [Ext] Re: FW: For your review - revised motion Nomination of GNSO Candidates for the RDS RT
Thanks, Renate. Per your suggestion, please see updated version attached. Are there any objections to this change?
Note that there are still quite a few people that have not weighed in on the proposed approach forward. So far, I’ve seen support from Poncelet, Julf and Renate. We have our call coming up in less than 3 hours so any feedback you may have in advance would be welcome.
Best regards,
Marika
On 4/18/17, 20:47, "Renata Aquino Ribeiro" <raquino@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi
Just as yesterday, I support this approach.
I just have one observation about the text of the motion - It lists candidates first in (surname) alphabetical order and then in ranking order. It would be clearer if the top 4 were also on ranking order.
Thanks
Renata
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 12:22 PM, Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org> wrote:
Thanks, Julf. I know that several of you expressed support for the approach on the way forward yesterday, but I just want to make sure that the proposed changes to the motion meet everyone’s expectations with regards to what was discussed. In addition, we especially need to hear from those of you that were not able to make the meeting.
Thanks,
Marika
On 4/18/17, 08:53, "gnso-ssc-bounces@icann.org on behalf of Johan Helsingius" <gnso-ssc-bounces@icann.org on behalf of julf@julf.com> wrote:
Dear Marika,
So far I’ve only seen Poncelet express his support for the proposed way forward.
I assumed that it was clear from our call that I support this approach, but let me hereby state it explicitly.
Julf
_______________________________________________ Gnso-ssc mailing list Gnso-ssc@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc
_______________________________________________ Gnso-ssc mailing list Gnso-ssc@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc
________________________________
El presente correo y cualquier posible archivo adjunto está dirigido únicamente al destinatario del mensaje y contiene información que puede ser confidencial. Si Ud. no es el destinatario correcto por favor notifique al remitente respondiendo anexando este mensaje y elimine inmediatamente el e-mail y los posibles archivos adjuntos al mismo de su sistema. Está prohibida cualquier utilización, difusión o copia de este e-mail por cualquier persona o entidad que no sean las específicas destinatarias del mensaje. ANTEL no acepta ninguna responsabilidad con respecto a cualquier comunicación que haya sido emitida incumpliendo nuestra Política de Seguridad de la Información
This e-mail and any attachment is confidential and is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not intended recipient please inform the sender immediately, answering this e-mail and delete it as well as the attached files. Any use, circulation or copy of this e-mail by any person or entity that is not the specific addressee(s) is prohibited. ANTEL is not responsible for any communication emitted without respecting our Information Security Policy. _______________________________________________ Gnso-ssc mailing list Gnso-ssc@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc