Hello Julf, I do support your point of view. If the only reason for co-chair position is a possibility to replace Chair in case of PTO or illness (time conflicts in our meetings can be resolved, due to rather small number of seats), then 2 co-chairs is definitely an overkill, and I think that only one is enough. Ultimately we can vote via poll for 1 question : 2 Co-chairs - is it a must for our Committee? (and next poll (depends on result of the first) - Whom do you support for A Co-Chair position? (for TWO Co-Chairs positions) P.s: I believe that in our case co-chair's position is quite formal and needed only for formal leading of the discussion during the calls (or on the list in case of Chair's PTO/sickness leave). Sincerely Yours, Maxim Alzoba Special projects manager, International Relations Department, FAITID m. +7 916 6761580(+whatsapp) skype oldfrogger Current UTC offset: +3.00 (.Moscow)
On May 15, 2017, at 10:27, Johan Helsingius <julf@julf.com> wrote:
(Apologies for late reply, as I was pretty busy at RIPE74)
Renata, Poncelet,
Thank you for the kind and encouraging words.
My only concern is that chair + 2 vice chairs for a group as small as ours might be a bit of overkill.
Julf
_______________________________________________ Gnso-ssc mailing list Gnso-ssc@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc