Hi everyone, Based on what's in the new spreadsheet Saewon has circulated, and what we discussed on the call today, I would like to suggest that we have staff circulate another survey monkey with only the ranking section and with only these top 13 candidates' names listed. We would each rank this group only and then see who is in the top seven spots. In these 13 candidates we have every region represented. I would submit that it would then be up to the individual committee member to decide what criteria influences their rankings. I would ask that these rankings be submitted by 23:00 on Friday to allow staff time to tabulate the results prior to our call on Monday. For those members who did not respond to the first survey and weren't on the call today, please do listen to the recording and review these materials so that you can participate in this ranking activity. Your participation is vital to our mission. Thanks! Karen Day Tel: +1 (919) 531-6016 ________________________________ From: Saewon Lee via Gnso-ssc <gnso-ssc@icann.org> Sent: Monday, July 1, 2024 4:30 PM To: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@icann.org>; gnso-ssc@icann.org <gnso-ssc@icann.org> Cc: Alperen Eken <alperen.eken@icann.org> Subject: [Gnso-ssc] Suggested List of Candidates (with Notes) | SSC - Pilot Holistic Review candidates evaluation call | Monday, 01 July 2024 EXTERNAL Dear SSC members, Per our call today, please find the google spreadsheet that contains the votes during the call and ranking that follows: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1P9XZ3hd0J6GfaOpStV92zSpWDkqXwl7rmatNfwS07uU/edit?usp=sharing<https://protect.checkpoint.com/v2/___https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1P9XZ3hd0J6GfaOpStV92zSpWDkqXwl7rmatNfwS07uU/edit?usp=sharing___.YzJ1OnNhc2luc3RpdHV0ZTpjOm86YWJjZjUxYTZiNjY0NGJkM2Q5MDRlM2RlMjk3MTZiNjc6NjpjOTJkOmFiNDk0Y2VjNDUwNDRhMGEzMzBhMDc0ZWFjNDYyNWM5NDY2N2Y5MTkzMDkzYjU1MGM3ZTcwMDk0ZDRjMDNmOTE6aDpUOk4> Some points to note from the spreadsheet ranking: * The order of names (No. in A column) is in the order of ranking from today’s call. * The Top 9 (until Ranking 7) have 3 votes, and the Top 13 (until Ranking 10) have 2 votes. (I could not cut the Top 10 and/or the Top 12 due to the identical number of votes) * The column J in red shows the poll results to compare to: In ranking 7’s, Marie Pattullo overlaps with the Poll result; In ranking 10’s there are no overlapping candidates. * Mark Datysgeld that ranked 3rd in the Poll Result is excluded in the call ranking today based on the discussions (i.e., previous SSC appointee) Other than the spreadsheet with rankings to help the members with the decision, kindly find the attached survey results, that were also shared in the meeting, for your reference. Below, you will also find the notes/details from the meeting to help you in your decision-making process. Kind regards, Julie and Saewon. Notes and Action Items SSC’s Pilot Holistic Review Candidates Evaluation on Monday, 01 July 2024, at 18:00 UTC. [Action Items] 1. GNSO Staff Support to share a google spreadsheet with the list of candidates and ranking results from the call [COMPLETE] 2. GNSO Secretariat to send an invite for the 8 July and 15 July Meetings to take place at 18:00 UTC. [Notes] 1. Welcome & SOIs - N/A 2. Pilot Holistic Review Candidates Evaluation a. Poll Results - See the attached files for the poll result details. - 6 responses for 19 candidates – Team can discuss the candidates based on the ranking, but it is not the decision-making factor (The poll is to be just a guidance, NOT the decision) - The results were show the ranking 1-7 (list below) b. Candidates Evaluation - 7 candidates were ranked in the following order based on the poll results: 1. Anil Jain 2. Marie Pattullo 3. Julf (Johan) Helsingius 3. Mark Datysgeld 5. Caleb Ogundele 6. Tony Holmes 6. James Gannon * Discussion points: * The SSC Chair pointed out that Mark Datysgeld was one of the last SSC members, if a need to consider when allowing for different people to participate. * Geographic criteria does not seem to be considered within this result and may need a different approach * Any term limits for these candidates? – No. Subject to the duration of the project as it will be more like a PDP/WG. c. Suggested List of Candidates * Discussion points: * How should the evaluation process proceed was discussed, and a suggestion was to select the top 10, then drop to 7 (or top 12) based on the region, participation, recent project, etc. * A suggestion that Diversity must be put into consideration as regions cannot be left unconsidered was raised and agreed upon by the members. * Each member shared their rankings and they are as follows (in the order of ranking): * Karen: Tony Holmes, Anil Jain, Bekono Pascal, Caleb Ogundele, Emmanuel Vitus, Gbadamosi Gbadamosi, Sophie Hey, Poncelet Ileleji, James Gannon, Julf Helsingius (4 from Africa, 4 Europe, 1 NA, 1 AP) – Mark Datysgeld was dropped as he was our last appointee. * Jothan: Same as above for Top 7 + Sophie Hey, Hector Ariel Manoff, Akinmoyeje Benjamin * Bruna: Anil Jain, Caleb Ogundele, James Ganon, Julf Helsingius, Marie Pattullo, Sophie Hey, Pedro Lana, Tony Holmes * Remmy: Anil Jain, Caleb Ogundele, James Ganon, Julf Helsingius, Marie Pattullo, Sophie Hey, Akinmoyeje Benjamin, Tony Holmes, Emmanuel Vitus, Pedro Lana * Segunfunmi: Anil Jain, Marie Pattullo, Caleb Ogundele, Mark Datysgeld, Akinmoyeje Benjamin, Julf Helsingius, and Tony Holmes d. Timing of Consensus Call - Consensus Call will be held post-8 July after last discussion and consideration 3. GAC Liaison Selection Process -- Timing of Meeting on Monday, 15 July (1800 or 1900 UTC) - Confirmed for 18:00 UTC for the GAC liaison selection meeting - For the GAC liaison process, the candidate list can be shared with the members, for easy review, via a google spreadsheet as the GAC liaison selection process is managed by the GNSO Staff Support. 4. AOB