FW: Draft EOI materials - second GNSO representative - Community Representatives Group for IRP Standing Panel selection
Dear SSC members, For your information, draft materials for the second CRG Expression of Interest process and a draft timeline of next steps are now being reviewed by SG/C Chairs and Council Leadership (see attached and below for details). If you have any questions, please let us know. Kind regards, Emily From: Emily Barabas <emily.barabas@icann.org> Date: Monday, 1 March 2021 at 09:21 To: "philippe.fouquart@orange.com" <philippe.fouquart@orange.com>, 'Heather Forrest' <haforrestesq@gmail.com>, "mcole@perkinscoie.com" <mcole@perkinscoie.com>, 'Wolf-Ulrich Knoben' <Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@t-online.de>, 'Bruna Martins dos Santos' <bruna.mrtns@gmail.com>, 'Raoul Plommer' <plommer@gmail.com>, 'Raphaël Beauregard-Lacroix' <rbeauregardlacroix@gmail.com>, "'aheineman@godaddy.com'" <aheineman@godaddy.com>, "'Demetriou, Samantha'" <sdemetriou@verisign.com>, "'chair@rysg.info'" <chair@rysg.info> Cc: "gnso-secs@icann.org" <gnso-secs@icann.org>, Steve Chan <steve.chan@icann.org>, Mary Wong <mary.wong@icann.org>, Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@icann.org>, "Gnso-chairs@icann.org" <Gnso-chairs@icann.org> Subject: Draft EOI materials - second GNSO representative - Community Representatives Group for IRP Standing Panel selection Dear SG/C Chairs and Council Leadership, Please find attached for your review a draft Expression of Interest announcement and EOI application form for the below referenced EOI process. In drafting these materials, staff has taken into account recommendations from the SSC following the previous CRG selection process (see attached SSC report) by clearly presenting all relevant information in the EOI announcement text (SSC recommendation 1) and including an EOI form for applicants to complete (SSC recommendation 3). If you have any feedback on these materials, please provide your comments by this Friday, 5 March. Below is a draft timeline of next steps for your consideration: * 8 March 2021: EOI process opens * 28 March 2021: EOI process closes * 29 March-9 May 2021: SSC completes selection process * 10 May 2021: Document deadline for May Council meeting * 20 May 2021: GNSO votes on SSC selection Thank you in advance for your review. Kind regards, Emily From: "philippe.fouquart@orange.com" <philippe.fouquart@orange.com> Date: Wednesday, 17 February 2021 at 18:07 To: 'Heather Forrest' <haforrestesq@gmail.com>, "mcole@perkinscoie.com" <mcole@perkinscoie.com>, 'Wolf-Ulrich Knoben' <Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@t-online.de>, 'Bruna Martins dos Santos' <bruna.mrtns@gmail.com>, 'Raoul Plommer' <plommer@gmail.com>, 'Raphaël Beauregard-Lacroix' <rbeauregardlacroix@gmail.com>, "'aheineman@godaddy.com'" <aheineman@godaddy.com>, "'Demetriou, Samantha'" <sdemetriou@verisign.com>, "'chair@rysg.info'" <chair@rysg.info> Cc: "gnso-secs@icann.org" <gnso-secs@icann.org>, Emily Barabas <emily.barabas@icann.org>, Steve Chan <steve.chan@icann.org>, Mary Wong <mary.wong@icann.org>, Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@icann.org>, "Gnso-chairs@icann.org" <Gnso-chairs@icann.org> Subject: [Ext] FW: IRP Standing Panel selection (second GNSO EOI process) Dear SG/C chairs, This is for your information on the follow-up with the SOACs on the IRP Standing Panel selection. My apologies for not copying you on this note sent earlier today. Best regards, Philippe From: FOUQUART Philippe TGI/OLN Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2021 2:41 PM To: soac-chairs@icann.org Cc: 'gnso-secs@icann.org' <gnso-secs@icann.org>; 'Emily Barabas' <emily.barabas@icann.org>; Steve Chan <steve.chan@icann.org>; Mary Wong <mary.wong@icann.org>; Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@icann.org>; 'Gnso-chairs@icann.org' <Gnso-chairs@icann.org> Subject: IRP Standing Panel selection (second GNSO EOI process) Dear colleagues, On behalf of the GNSO community, I’d like to thank you and your community groups for the collaborative work on the final Terms of Reference for the Community Representatives Group that will work with ICANN org and the external consultant to select the seven members of the Independent Review Process (IRP) Standing Panel. I understand that the ALAC, GAC and ccNSO have all confirmed your representatives and I’m happy to inform you all that the GNSO has also confirmed that Heather Forrest – who most of you know – will be representing the GNSO in the Community Representatives Group. Heather was selected unanimously by the GNSO’s Standing Selection Committee and her appointment endorsed by the full GNSO Council. We are extremely pleased and grateful that Heather has agreed to lend her expertise and experience to this important cross-community effort. I would like to also inform you that, following further discussions within the GNSO, the various Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies have agreed to launch another Expression of Interest (EOI) process, to try to see if we can appoint a second representative to join Heather in the work to come. I wish to emphasize that our intention has nothing to do with Heather’s selection and everything to do with the GNSO’s sense that both it and the broader community will benefit from adding a second GNSO member to the Community Representatives Group. As you are aware, it is likely that most IRP proceedings will involve gTLDs. In addition, the Terms of Reference had prescribed an odd number of members for the Community Representatives Group (presumably to avoid deadlock). At the moment, we have six representatives – in addition to Heather, there is one appointee for the ccNSO and two each for the ALAC and the GAC. The GNSO’s plan to issue a second EOI call should not, and I hope will not, affect or delay the convening of the Community Representatives Group. We fully support the Group commencing its work as soon as feasible, without waiting for the result of this second EOI process. I understand that this may happen once ICANN org has completed the process for bringing on board the external consultant. In this regard, I take this opportunity, on behalf of the GNSO community, to thank ICANN org staff for its transparency in sharing the proposed Statement of Work for the consultant. I hope this note explains the GNSO’s current intentions and next steps. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you! Best regards, Philippe _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you.
Thank you for the update Emily. In regard to the time commitment for the CRG volunteer, I see the notation in the EOI on time commitment. While we have no historical data to refer, I wonder whether it would be appropriate to give a hard estimate in hours there? Is there another engagement we could model for this? Maybe a NomCom engagement? Or even, previous work as an IRP panelist? Best, Carlton ============================== *Carlton A Samuels* *Mobile: 876-818-1799Strategy, Process, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* ============================= On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 3:24 AM Emily Barabas via Gnso-ssc < gnso-ssc@icann.org> wrote:
Dear SSC members,
For your information, draft materials for the second CRG Expression of Interest process and a draft timeline of next steps are now being reviewed by SG/C Chairs and Council Leadership (see attached and below for details).
If you have any questions, please let us know.
Kind regards,
Emily
*From: *Emily Barabas <emily.barabas@icann.org> *Date: *Monday, 1 March 2021 at 09:21 *To: *"philippe.fouquart@orange.com" <philippe.fouquart@orange.com>, 'Heather Forrest' <haforrestesq@gmail.com>, "mcole@perkinscoie.com" < mcole@perkinscoie.com>, 'Wolf-Ulrich Knoben' < Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@t-online.de>, 'Bruna Martins dos Santos' < bruna.mrtns@gmail.com>, 'Raoul Plommer' <plommer@gmail.com>, 'Raphaël Beauregard-Lacroix' <rbeauregardlacroix@gmail.com>, "' aheineman@godaddy.com'" <aheineman@godaddy.com>, "'Demetriou, Samantha'" < sdemetriou@verisign.com>, "'chair@rysg.info'" <chair@rysg.info> *Cc: *"gnso-secs@icann.org" <gnso-secs@icann.org>, Steve Chan < steve.chan@icann.org>, Mary Wong <mary.wong@icann.org>, Julie Hedlund < julie.hedlund@icann.org>, "Gnso-chairs@icann.org" <Gnso-chairs@icann.org> *Subject: *Draft EOI materials - second GNSO representative - Community Representatives Group for IRP Standing Panel selection
Dear SG/C Chairs and Council Leadership,
Please find attached for your review a draft Expression of Interest announcement and EOI application form for the below referenced EOI process. In drafting these materials, staff has taken into account recommendations from the SSC following the previous CRG selection process (see attached SSC report) by clearly presenting all relevant information in the EOI announcement text (SSC recommendation 1) and including an EOI form for applicants to complete (SSC recommendation 3).
If you have any feedback on these materials, *please provide your comments by this Friday, 5 March*. Below is a draft timeline of next steps for your consideration:
- 8 March 2021: EOI process opens - 28 March 2021: EOI process closes - 29 March-9 May 2021: SSC completes selection process - 10 May 2021: Document deadline for May Council meeting - 20 May 2021: GNSO votes on SSC selection
Thank you in advance for your review.
Kind regards,
Emily
*From: *"philippe.fouquart@orange.com" <philippe.fouquart@orange.com> *Date: *Wednesday, 17 February 2021 at 18:07 *To: *'Heather Forrest' <haforrestesq@gmail.com>, "mcole@perkinscoie.com" <mcole@perkinscoie.com>, 'Wolf-Ulrich Knoben' < Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@t-online.de>, 'Bruna Martins dos Santos' < bruna.mrtns@gmail.com>, 'Raoul Plommer' <plommer@gmail.com>, 'Raphaël Beauregard-Lacroix' <rbeauregardlacroix@gmail.com>, "' aheineman@godaddy.com'" <aheineman@godaddy.com>, "'Demetriou, Samantha'" < sdemetriou@verisign.com>, "'chair@rysg.info'" <chair@rysg.info> *Cc: *"gnso-secs@icann.org" <gnso-secs@icann.org>, Emily Barabas < emily.barabas@icann.org>, Steve Chan <steve.chan@icann.org>, Mary Wong < mary.wong@icann.org>, Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@icann.org>, " Gnso-chairs@icann.org" <Gnso-chairs@icann.org> *Subject: *[Ext] FW: IRP Standing Panel selection (second GNSO EOI process)
Dear SG/C chairs,
This is for your information on the follow-up with the SOACs on the IRP Standing Panel selection. My apologies for not copying you on this note sent earlier today.
Best regards,
Philippe
*From:* FOUQUART Philippe TGI/OLN *Sent:* Wednesday, February 17, 2021 2:41 PM *To:* soac-chairs@icann.org *Cc:* 'gnso-secs@icann.org' <gnso-secs@icann.org>; 'Emily Barabas' < emily.barabas@icann.org>; Steve Chan <steve.chan@icann.org>; Mary Wong < mary.wong@icann.org>; Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@icann.org>; ' Gnso-chairs@icann.org' <Gnso-chairs@icann.org> *Subject:* IRP Standing Panel selection (second GNSO EOI process)
Dear colleagues,
On behalf of the GNSO community, I’d like to thank you and your community groups for the collaborative work on the final Terms of Reference for the Community Representatives Group that will work with ICANN org and the external consultant to select the seven members of the Independent Review Process (IRP) Standing Panel. I understand that the ALAC, GAC and ccNSO have all confirmed your representatives and I’m happy to inform you all that the GNSO has also confirmed that Heather Forrest – who most of you know – will be representing the GNSO in the Community Representatives Group. Heather was selected unanimously by the GNSO’s Standing Selection Committee and her appointment endorsed by the full GNSO Council. We are extremely pleased and grateful that Heather has agreed to lend her expertise and experience to this important cross-community effort.
I would like to also inform you that, following further discussions within the GNSO, the various Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies have agreed to launch another Expression of Interest (EOI) process, to try to see if we can appoint a second representative to join Heather in the work to come. I wish to emphasize that our intention has nothing to do with Heather’s selection and everything to do with the GNSO’s sense that both it and the broader community will benefit from adding a second GNSO member to the Community Representatives Group. As you are aware, it is likely that most IRP proceedings will involve gTLDs. In addition, the Terms of Reference had prescribed an odd number of members for the Community Representatives Group (presumably to avoid deadlock). At the moment, we have six representatives – in addition to Heather, there is one appointee for the ccNSO and two each for the ALAC and the GAC.
The GNSO’s plan to issue a second EOI call should not, and I hope will not, affect or delay the convening of the Community Representatives Group. We fully support the Group commencing its work as soon as feasible, without waiting for the result of this second EOI process. I understand that this may happen once ICANN org has completed the process for bringing on board the external consultant. In this regard, I take this opportunity, on behalf of the GNSO community, to thank ICANN org staff for its transparency in sharing the proposed Statement of Work for the consultant.
I hope this note explains the GNSO’s current intentions and next steps. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!
Best regards,
Philippe
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.
_______________________________________________ Gnso-ssc mailing list Gnso-ssc@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
Hi Carlton, Thanks for review of the materials and your question. I agree that it is better to be precise when possible, but there are indeed a couple of challenges in estimating the time commitment to include in the EOI announcement. First, as you note, the CRG is a new body/process that has some unique characteristics including the fact that they are ramping up CRG operations for the first time, and therefore the Terms of Reference doesn’t make an exact estimate regarding time commitment. And second, it is difficult to tell at this stage how far into its initial tasks the CRG will be when the new (second) GNSO representative joins. I think the best we can do at this stage is to encourage open lines of communication during the process, so as more information becomes available, potential candidates can perhaps get a better sense of what they are signing up for. I know that isn’t the ideal answer, but hopefully it will supplement the EOI announcement to some extent. Kind regards, Emily From: Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels@gmail.com> Date: Monday, 1 March 2021 at 16:14 To: Emily Barabas <emily.barabas@icann.org> Cc: "gnso-ssc@icann.org" <gnso-ssc@icann.org> Subject: [Ext] Re: [Gnso-ssc] FW: Draft EOI materials - second GNSO representative - Community Representatives Group for IRP Standing Panel selection Thank you for the update Emily. In regard to the time commitment for the CRG volunteer, I see the notation in the EOI on time commitment. While we have no historical data to refer, I wonder whether it would be appropriate to give a hard estimate in hours there? Is there another engagement we could model for this? Maybe a NomCom engagement? Or even, previous work as an IRP panelist? Best, Carlton ============================== Carlton A Samuels Mobile: 876-818-1799 Strategy, Process, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround ============================= On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 3:24 AM Emily Barabas via Gnso-ssc <gnso-ssc@icann.org<mailto:gnso-ssc@icann.org>> wrote: Dear SSC members, For your information, draft materials for the second CRG Expression of Interest process and a draft timeline of next steps are now being reviewed by SG/C Chairs and Council Leadership (see attached and below for details). If you have any questions, please let us know. Kind regards, Emily From: Emily Barabas <emily.barabas@icann.org<mailto:emily.barabas@icann.org>> Date: Monday, 1 March 2021 at 09:21 To: "philippe.fouquart@orange.com<mailto:philippe.fouquart@orange.com>" <philippe.fouquart@orange.com<mailto:philippe.fouquart@orange.com>>, 'Heather Forrest' <haforrestesq@gmail.com<mailto:haforrestesq@gmail.com>>, "mcole@perkinscoie.com<mailto:mcole@perkinscoie.com>" <mcole@perkinscoie.com<mailto:mcole@perkinscoie.com>>, 'Wolf-Ulrich Knoben' <Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@t-online.de<mailto:Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@t-online.de>>, 'Bruna Martins dos Santos' <bruna.mrtns@gmail.com<mailto:bruna.mrtns@gmail.com>>, 'Raoul Plommer' <plommer@gmail.com<mailto:plommer@gmail.com>>, 'Raphaël Beauregard-Lacroix' <rbeauregardlacroix@gmail.com<mailto:rbeauregardlacroix@gmail.com>>, "'aheineman@godaddy.com<mailto:aheineman@godaddy.com>'" <aheineman@godaddy.com<mailto:aheineman@godaddy.com>>, "'Demetriou, Samantha'" <sdemetriou@verisign.com<mailto:sdemetriou@verisign.com>>, "'chair@rysg.info<mailto:chair@rysg.info>'" <chair@rysg.info<mailto:chair@rysg.info>> Cc: "gnso-secs@icann.org<mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org>" <gnso-secs@icann.org<mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org>>, Steve Chan <steve.chan@icann.org<mailto:steve.chan@icann.org>>, Mary Wong <mary.wong@icann.org<mailto:mary.wong@icann.org>>, Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@icann.org<mailto:julie.hedlund@icann.org>>, "Gnso-chairs@icann.org<mailto:Gnso-chairs@icann.org>" <Gnso-chairs@icann.org<mailto:Gnso-chairs@icann.org>> Subject: Draft EOI materials - second GNSO representative - Community Representatives Group for IRP Standing Panel selection Dear SG/C Chairs and Council Leadership, Please find attached for your review a draft Expression of Interest announcement and EOI application form for the below referenced EOI process. In drafting these materials, staff has taken into account recommendations from the SSC following the previous CRG selection process (see attached SSC report) by clearly presenting all relevant information in the EOI announcement text (SSC recommendation 1) and including an EOI form for applicants to complete (SSC recommendation 3). If you have any feedback on these materials, please provide your comments by this Friday, 5 March. Below is a draft timeline of next steps for your consideration: * 8 March 2021: EOI process opens * 28 March 2021: EOI process closes * 29 March-9 May 2021: SSC completes selection process * 10 May 2021: Document deadline for May Council meeting * 20 May 2021: GNSO votes on SSC selection Thank you in advance for your review. Kind regards, Emily From: "philippe.fouquart@orange.com<mailto:philippe.fouquart@orange.com>" <philippe.fouquart@orange.com<mailto:philippe.fouquart@orange.com>> Date: Wednesday, 17 February 2021 at 18:07 To: 'Heather Forrest' <haforrestesq@gmail.com<mailto:haforrestesq@gmail.com>>, "mcole@perkinscoie.com<mailto:mcole@perkinscoie.com>" <mcole@perkinscoie.com<mailto:mcole@perkinscoie.com>>, 'Wolf-Ulrich Knoben' <Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@t-online.de<mailto:Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@t-online.de>>, 'Bruna Martins dos Santos' <bruna.mrtns@gmail.com<mailto:bruna.mrtns@gmail.com>>, 'Raoul Plommer' <plommer@gmail.com<mailto:plommer@gmail.com>>, 'Raphaël Beauregard-Lacroix' <rbeauregardlacroix@gmail.com<mailto:rbeauregardlacroix@gmail.com>>, "'aheineman@godaddy.com<mailto:aheineman@godaddy.com>'" <aheineman@godaddy.com<mailto:aheineman@godaddy.com>>, "'Demetriou, Samantha'" <sdemetriou@verisign.com<mailto:sdemetriou@verisign.com>>, "'chair@rysg.info<mailto:chair@rysg.info>'" <chair@rysg.info<mailto:chair@rysg.info>> Cc: "gnso-secs@icann.org<mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org>" <gnso-secs@icann.org<mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org>>, Emily Barabas <emily.barabas@icann.org<mailto:emily.barabas@icann.org>>, Steve Chan <steve.chan@icann.org<mailto:steve.chan@icann.org>>, Mary Wong <mary.wong@icann.org<mailto:mary.wong@icann.org>>, Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@icann.org<mailto:julie.hedlund@icann.org>>, "Gnso-chairs@icann.org<mailto:Gnso-chairs@icann.org>" <Gnso-chairs@icann.org<mailto:Gnso-chairs@icann.org>> Subject: [Ext] FW: IRP Standing Panel selection (second GNSO EOI process) Dear SG/C chairs, This is for your information on the follow-up with the SOACs on the IRP Standing Panel selection. My apologies for not copying you on this note sent earlier today. Best regards, Philippe From: FOUQUART Philippe TGI/OLN Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2021 2:41 PM To: soac-chairs@icann.org<mailto:soac-chairs@icann.org> Cc: 'gnso-secs@icann.org<mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org>' <gnso-secs@icann.org<mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org>>; 'Emily Barabas' <emily.barabas@icann.org<mailto:emily.barabas@icann.org>>; Steve Chan <steve.chan@icann.org<mailto:steve.chan@icann.org>>; Mary Wong <mary.wong@icann.org<mailto:mary.wong@icann.org>>; Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@icann.org<mailto:julie.hedlund@icann.org>>; 'Gnso-chairs@icann.org<mailto:Gnso-chairs@icann.org>' <Gnso-chairs@icann.org<mailto:Gnso-chairs@icann.org>> Subject: IRP Standing Panel selection (second GNSO EOI process) Dear colleagues, On behalf of the GNSO community, I’d like to thank you and your community groups for the collaborative work on the final Terms of Reference for the Community Representatives Group that will work with ICANN org and the external consultant to select the seven members of the Independent Review Process (IRP) Standing Panel. I understand that the ALAC, GAC and ccNSO have all confirmed your representatives and I’m happy to inform you all that the GNSO has also confirmed that Heather Forrest – who most of you know – will be representing the GNSO in the Community Representatives Group. Heather was selected unanimously by the GNSO’s Standing Selection Committee and her appointment endorsed by the full GNSO Council. We are extremely pleased and grateful that Heather has agreed to lend her expertise and experience to this important cross-community effort. I would like to also inform you that, following further discussions within the GNSO, the various Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies have agreed to launch another Expression of Interest (EOI) process, to try to see if we can appoint a second representative to join Heather in the work to come. I wish to emphasize that our intention has nothing to do with Heather’s selection and everything to do with the GNSO’s sense that both it and the broader community will benefit from adding a second GNSO member to the Community Representatives Group. As you are aware, it is likely that most IRP proceedings will involve gTLDs. In addition, the Terms of Reference had prescribed an odd number of members for the Community Representatives Group (presumably to avoid deadlock). At the moment, we have six representatives – in addition to Heather, there is one appointee for the ccNSO and two each for the ALAC and the GAC. The GNSO’s plan to issue a second EOI call should not, and I hope will not, affect or delay the convening of the Community Representatives Group. We fully support the Group commencing its work as soon as feasible, without waiting for the result of this second EOI process. I understand that this may happen once ICANN org has completed the process for bringing on board the external consultant. In this regard, I take this opportunity, on behalf of the GNSO community, to thank ICANN org staff for its transparency in sharing the proposed Statement of Work for the consultant. I hope this note explains the GNSO’s current intentions and next steps. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you! Best regards, Philippe _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. _______________________________________________ Gnso-ssc mailing list Gnso-ssc@icann.org<mailto:Gnso-ssc@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ssc _______________________________________________ By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy [icann.org]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.icann.org/privacy/policy__;!!PtGJab4!...>) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos [icann.org]<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.icann.org/privacy/tos__;!!PtGJab4!rja...>). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
participants (2)
-
Carlton Samuels -
Emily Barabas