Dear All, Please find attached the meeting notes from 19 May and the updated draft Guidelines document. Please let me know if you have any feedback or suggestions. The action item from the meeting is: S. No. Action Items Owner 1 Staff to update the draft Guidelines document based on the discussion and circulate SH Kindly note that the meeting recording and the attached notes are also available at the IDNGWG wiki page: https://community.icann.org/display/IDN/IDN+Implementation+Guidelines. Regards, Sarmad From: idngwg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:idngwg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Sarmad Hussain Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2016 9:09 AM To: idngwg@icann.org Subject: Re: [Idngwg] Draft document initial version Thanks Edmon, Dennis and Chris for the suggestions in the text. Dear All, The suggested revisions have been incorporated in the attached document, for further discussion during our call today. Regards, Sarmad From: Edmon Chung [mailto:edmon@registry.asia] Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2016 4:53 AM To: Sarmad Hussain <sarmad.hussain@icann.org <mailto:sarmad.hussain@icann.org> >; 'Tan Tanaka, Dennis' <dtantanaka@verisign.com <mailto:dtantanaka@verisign.com> > Cc: idngwg@icann.org <mailto:idngwg@icann.org> Subject: RE: [Idngwg] Draft document initial version Simple suggestion for 2.1 as discussed in last call: //current recommendation 1: Top-level domain ("TLD") registries supporting Internationalized Domain Names ("IDNs") will do so in strict compliance with the requirements of the IETF protocol for Internationalized Domain Names in Applications. The initial version of this protocol was defined in RFCs 3454, 3490, 3491, and 3492. A revised version is defined in RFCs 5890, 5891, 5892, 5893, and 5894. Both will be in parallel use in applications for an indeterminate transitional period but registries will conform fully with IDNA2008 in the shortest practicable order. Recommendation: Remove reference to obsoleted RFCs (3,xxx series) and just refer to current ones (5,xxx series): Top-level domain ("TLD") registries supporting Internationalized Domain Names ("IDNs") will do so in strict compliance with the requirements of the IETF protocol for Internationalized Domain Names in Applications, as defined in RFCs 5890, 5891, 5892, 5893, and 5894. ================================== Also, due to travel schedules adjustments, I may not be able to join the call later today. I am supposed to arrive into Tokyo about 45 minutes before the call. If there is no delay, I should be able to join. In case of delay, my apologies. Edmon From: idngwg-bounces@icann.org <mailto:idngwg-bounces@icann.org> [mailto:idngwg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Sarmad Hussain Sent: Wednesday, 18 May 2016 17:02 PM To: Tan Tanaka, Dennis <dtantanaka@verisign.com <mailto:dtantanaka@verisign.com> > Cc: idngwg@icann.org <mailto:idngwg@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Idngwg] Draft document initial version Thank you Dennis. From: Tan Tanaka, Dennis [mailto:dtantanaka@verisign.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 1:21 PM To: Sarmad Hussain <sarmad.hussain@icann.org <mailto:sarmad.hussain@icann.org> >; idngwg@icann.org <mailto:idngwg@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Idngwg] Draft document initial version Sarmad, et al Please find enclosed a revised Introduction section for version 4 with commentary. In doing this I reviewed previous versions of the guidelines and tried to come up with a short and sweet version that keeps it generic (i.e. not 2013 RA specific). I will be a few minutes late due to a schedule conflict. Talk to you soon. Dennis From: <idngwg-bounces@icann.org <mailto:idngwg-bounces@icann.org> > on behalf of Sarmad Hussain <sarmad.hussain@icann.org <mailto:sarmad.hussain@icann.org> > Date: Wednesday, May 4, 2016 at 2:00 PM To: "idngwg@icann.org <mailto:idngwg@icann.org> " <idngwg@icann.org <mailto:idngwg@icann.org> > Subject: [Idngwg] Draft document initial version Dear IDNGWG members, Please find attached the an initial version of the document derived from the issues list and follow our discussion in the previous conf. call (see action items in the email below). I have divided “Terminology and Transition” to two sections and added a place holder for EPP, as raised by the community, totaling to eight items – for the WG to finalize. I have also gone through the earlier version 3.0 of these guidelines and added the recommendations from it in the relevant sections (all nine have been mapped) – shown in italics – as a reference starting point. Finally, I have added the terminology we are identifying in the appendix of this document. This list will grow over time, and we will also need to finalize the definitions for each term. The recommendation section against issue is left blank for the WG to discuss and advise. Please feel free to share your feedback to develop the document further. Looking forward to your call tomorrow (Thursday). Regards, Sarmad From: idngwg-bounces@icann.org <mailto:idngwg-bounces@icann.org> [mailto:idngwg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Sarmad Hussain Sent: Friday, April 22, 2016 3:54 PM To: idngwg@icann.org <mailto:idngwg@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Idngwg] Agenda for meeting on 20160421 Dear All, Please find attached a summary of the discussion during our meeting on 21 April, with the following action items. S. No. Action Owner 1 WG members should note that it is being suggested to include indication of recommendations or relevant questions in the scope of initial WG report, in addition to the list of issues. WG members to share their feedback on the proposed scope. WG Members not on the call on 20160421 2 Staff to start the initial report for the WG SH Please feel free to suggest any edits to the summary. Call recording and summary is available at IDNGWG wiki page: https://community.icann.org/display/IDN/IDN+Implementation+Guidelines. Regards, Sarmad From: idngwg-bounces@icann.org <mailto:idngwg-bounces@icann.org> [mailto:idngwg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Sarmad Hussain Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 3:49 PM To: idngwg@icann.org <mailto:idngwg@icann.org> Subject: [Idngwg] Agenda for meeting on 20160421 Dear All, Here is a tentative agenda for the meeting today: 1. review feedback from community from Marrakech meeting 2. consider next steps and scope of initial/interim report 3. timeframe for 2. Regards, Sarmad