- Internal-cg - lists.icann.org

Action items from ICG Call #10, 14 January 2015
by Jennifer Chung Jan. 14, 2015

Jan. 14, 2015

Action items from todays call: 1. ICG co-chairs to follow up on the email list on the further division of responsibility of Secretariat functions. 2. Approval of the 10 December 2014 minutes. 3. Fältström to follow up with note to the email list regarding the logistics of working late on the first day of the face-to-face meetings in Singapore (6 February 2015). 4. Cooper to follow up on the email list re the timeline and if the ICG should follow up with the CWG on Naming related functions regarding this issue. Best Regards, Jennifer

1 0

Dial In and Adobe Info
by Drazek, Keith Jan. 14, 2015

Jan. 14, 2015

Can someone please reply to this with the dial-in and adobe link? Thanks, Keith “This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is non-public, proprietary, privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law or may be constituted as attorney work product. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, notify sender immediately and delete this message immediately.”

2 1

Personal update
by Alissa Cooper Jan. 14, 2015

Jan. 14, 2015

Hi all, I wanted to let you know that I’m expecting my first baby in March. As a result, I will not be able to travel to Singapore for ICANN 52, and I will be taking some time away from work after the baby is born. Mohamed, Patrik, and I have discussed ICG chairing responsibilities in light of this and wanted to share that plan with you. For the Feb 6-7 ICG meeting and ICANN 52: * As they did for the September meeting, Patrik and Mohamed will decide amongst themselves who will run each session or portion thereof (and we can of course continue the practice of sharing that responsibility among all the ICG members). * I will participate remotely for as much of the meetings as possible and will be available by phone/Skype/IM for ad hoc discussion as necessary. Daylight hours in Singapore are early-to-late evening hours in California, so this should work ok. For parental leave time: My parental leave will likely start in early-to-mid March (although it could start earlier, it’s not entirely predictable). My rough plan for leave is outline below, but obviously it could change substantially at any time depending on how everything goes. I plan to take 4 weeks entirely off of work after the baby is born. If some ICG emergency requires my attention during that time, Patrik and Mohamed will have my contact details and will be able to reach me. During that time they will decide amongst themselves who will run teleconferences, make consensus calls (if necessary), and make administrative decisions, or they will do those things jointly. After 4 weeks I will still be at home with the baby but will plan to return to my ICG responsibilities. Patrik, Mohamed and I will coordinate if scheduling issues come up on my end but my hope is to be able to re-engage with the mailing list, phone conferences, and the rest of our work. After 12 weeks I will be back to working full-time. I plan to travel to ICANN 53. Please feel free to reach out to me on the mailing list or privately if you have questions. Alissa

18 19

Agenda for January 14 call
by Alissa Cooper Jan. 14, 2015

Jan. 14, 2015

Hi all, Here is a draft agenda for our January 14 call. We will be discussing more details of some of these items on the mailing list between now and then, but I wanted to circulate a preliminary agenda with time for folks to provide feedback or suggest additional agenda items. * Secretariat update (5 minutes) * Proposal assembly and finalization — review volunteers, process, timeline (10 minutes) * ICANN 52 planning (20 minutes) * Community process updates (remaining time) Thanks, Alissa

6 7

Draft minutes of 10 December 2014 teleconference
by Samantha Dickinson Jan. 13, 2015

Jan. 13, 2015

I just realised that I never uploaded the minutes of the last call to Dropbox. Please accept my apologies. The draft minutes are now available at: <https://www.dropbox.com/s/ijhwldzzk4ecx0o/minutes-teleconference-10%20decem…> Regards Sam

1 0

IETF response to ICG
by Jari Arkko Jan. 13, 2015

Jan. 13, 2015

Dear all, As you know, the IETF has been working on the protocol parameters aspects of the transition. We created the IANAPLAN working group, developed a proposed response, and held community discussions. And of course, there has been a lot of past evolution in this space as well. This part of the process is coming to an end from our side. Our steering group, the IESG, approved the proposed response on December 18, and after some minor editorial changes, the document has been formally approved today, January 6. The link to our proposal is below, and we look forward to working with the ICG and other communities on the next steps. We are committed to ensuring a good outcome for the Internet in this topic. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response-09 Jari Arkko

11 17

FW: [CWG-Stewardship] Chairs' Statement - Weekend Sessions 10 & 11 January 2015
by Martin Boyle Jan. 12, 2015

Jan. 12, 2015

Dear colleagues, Following the open consultation on its draft proposal, the Cross-Community Working Group on Naming Related Functions (CWG) held an intensive work weekend on 10-11 January: four conference calls, in total around nine hours. In preparation for the weekend the CWG carried out two surveys to test support for different ideas in the draft proposal and for some of the ideas and comments received during the consultation. I'm afraid that I will not be able to join you on Wednesday evening's call, but I thought it would be useful for you to note the outcome of the intensive work weekend and where the work now stands. I am forwarding to you the chairs' statement from the weekend, which has links to the detailed discussions. Hope this helps Martin From: cwg-stewardship-bounces(a)icann.org [mailto:cwg-stewardship-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Robinson Sent: 12 January 2015 00:25 To: cwg-stewardship(a)icann.org Subject: [CWG-Stewardship] Chairs' Statement - Weekend Sessions 10 & 11 January 2015 All, Please see attached for a Chairs' Statement arising out of the weekend sessions on 10 & 11 January 2015. Thank-you to all who contributed time and energy to the sessions. Best wishes, Jonathan & Lise

1 0

CircleID Blog on Transition
by Drazek, Keith Jan. 10, 2015

Jan. 10, 2015

FYI, in case you haven’t already seen this, it’s highly relevant to the work of the ICG: http://www.circleid.com/posts/20150105_haste_makes_waste_icann_on_cwg_iana_… Keith “This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is non-public, proprietary, privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law or may be constituted as attorney work product. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, notify sender immediately and delete this message immediately.”

9 8

Re: [Internal-cg] [Ianaplan] last call and IESG processing summary for draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response
by Milton L Mueller Jan. 9, 2015

Jan. 9, 2015

I would accept "The WG consensus did not agree with including the recommendations in the ICG response but this does not preclude the IAOC from pursuing them." > -----Original Message----- > From: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, January 7, 2015 2:33 PM > To: Milton L Mueller; Jari Arkko > Cc: Ianaplan@Ietf. Org; internal-cg(a)icann.org; draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg- > response.all(a)tools.ietf.org; IETF-Discussion list > Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] last call and IESG processing summary for draft-ietf- > ianaplan-icg-response > > Try " > > Regards > Brian > > On 08/01/2015 07:05, Milton L Mueller wrote: > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >>> I am afraid this is incorrect. The WG consensus said that it was not > >> necessary to specify the exact supplemental agreements to be > >> negotiated - that this should be left to the IAOC. My understanding > >> of the document, and my basis for agreeing to rough consensus, was > >> that the IAOC could pursue these or not, as it saw fit. > >> > >> I think we may be trying to say the same thing. The document > >> discusses what needs to be achieved. The WG's opinion of what is > >> necessary for the transition. But the WG did not want to put into the > >> document (a) detailed contractual language as that is an IAOC task or > >> (b) additional requests beyond the ones listed in the document. > >> However, the IAOC certainly is in charge of all specific contract language > already, and will be also in this case. > >> They will also consider any additional elements that they think will > >> be useful or needed, as they will always. > > > > Great, this is my understanding, too. So you should modify the assessment > of my comments because they say "The recommendation also states that the > advocated actions are in line with the current IANAPLAN draft. The IAOC has > taken this input for consideration. It should be noted that these > recommendations were discussed as part of the WG deliberations, however. > The WG consensus did not agree with the recommendations." > > > > That's the part that is not correct. > > > > The WG consensus was that there should not be detailed contractual > language in the document, as you say. It did not, however, foreclose or > negate the suggestions I made for future IAOC requests, it simply said that > they should not be specified or required by the IANAPlan document. The > IAOC retains the ability to request them if it thinks it appropriate in the near > term negotiations. > > > > I hope you understand the distinction. It was crucial to achieving rough > consensus. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Ianaplan mailing list > > Ianaplan(a)ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ianaplan > >

2 1

Update from the CRISP Team (Numbers community)
by Paul Wilson Jan. 9, 2015

Jan. 9, 2015

Dear Alissa and all, Here’s an update on the Internet numbers community proposal. All the best Paul. ________________________________________________________________________ Paul Wilson, Director-General, APNIC <dg(a)apnic.net> http://www.apnic.net +61 7 3858 3100 Begin forwarded message: > From: Izumi Okutani <izumi(a)nic.ad.jp> > Subject: Re: Consulting you as ICG member Fwd: Re: [CRISP-TEAM] Fwd: [NRO-IANAXFER] Internet Number Community IANA Stewardship Proposal: Final Call for Comments > Date: 9 January 2015 12:39:46 pm AEST > To: Paul Wilson <pwilson(a)apnic.net> > > Hi Paul, > > > I would appreciate it if you could share the following message to Alissa > Cooper as the Chair of the ICG, and if appropriate, to the ICG. > > > Thanks, > Izumi > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Dear Alissa, > > > I would like to share the status of developing the Internet numbers > community's response to the Request For Proposals issued by the IANA > Stewardship Coordination Group (ICG). > > As you are aware, the draft response has been prepared by the > Consolidated RIR IANA Stewardship Proposal (CRISP) team, based on its > role to integrate the input from each of the 5 RIR regions and finalize > the initial RIR submission to the ICG, in response to the RFP. > > The key dates in developing the response from the number resources > communities are as below, and we are pleased to share that our work is > currently in progress as scheduled. > > Key dates: > First draft comments close: 5 Jan 2015 > Second draft to be published: 8 Jan 2015 > Second draft comments close: 12 Jan 2015 > Final proposal to be sent to ICG: 15 Jan 2015 > > We are now calling for the final comments from the global number > resources community on the <ianaxfer(a)nro.net> mailing list, for the > second version of the draft published on 8th Jan 2015. > > Details of all the CRISP team's work to date, including the draft > response to the ICG (all versions including outdated), recordings, > minutes and agendas of all CRISP teleconferences and a public archive of > the internal CRISP team mailing list, are available at: > https://nro.net/crisp-team > > Please feel free to me know if you have any questions about the response > to be submitted to the ICG for the number resources component of the > IANA transition. > > > > Best Regards, > Izumi Okutani > Chair, The Consolidated RIR IANA Stewardship Proposal Team (CRISP Team) >

1 0