I would ask members to use the time frames requested to both comment on numbers as well as on the description of thr role. I would also ask that if we go with one chair we have some form of backup if the one chair can not make a meeting. Sent from my Android phone using TouchDown (www.nitrodesk.com) -----Original Message----- From: Daniel Karrenberg [daniel.karrenberg@ripe.net] Received: Monday, 21 Jul 2014, 12:08PM To: Mary Uduma [mnuduma@yahoo.com]; internal-cg@icann.org [internal-cg@icann.org] Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Co-chair roles document for comment On 21.07.14 0:45 , Mary Uduma wrote:
... In my opinion, I would ask the ICG to rethink on the issue of co-chairs. I think we need only a Chairperson to fast-rack our work. It is always very challenging to row the boat smoothly when there are several captains. Moreover, ICG is not a permanent Group.
We should cut down on bureaucracies of selecting three co-chairs with all the attendant "balancing" that must be considered in the process.
Looking back at 17-18 July meeting, you will agree with me that it was smooth, focused and well steered.
I will urge us to select a capable chair who can always call for volunteer leads on theme(s) and other adhoc task(s}. ...
I think Mary has spoken very wise words here. It is a pity that we have been too far down a rat-hole to hear her when she said this during the meeting. Maybe we can take the chance to heed her advice now. I, for one, completely agree with her. I also believe Alissa did an outstanding job preparing and running the meeting. We should we look further? Daniel _______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg