Re: [Internal-cg] Co-chair roles document for comment
I would ask members to use the time frames requested to both comment on numbers as well as on the description of thr role. I would also ask that if we go with one chair we have some form of backup if the one chair can not make a meeting. Sent from my Android phone using TouchDown (www.nitrodesk.com) -----Original Message----- From: Daniel Karrenberg [daniel.karrenberg@ripe.net] Received: Monday, 21 Jul 2014, 12:08PM To: Mary Uduma [mnuduma@yahoo.com]; internal-cg@icann.org [internal-cg@icann.org] Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Co-chair roles document for comment On 21.07.14 0:45 , Mary Uduma wrote:
... In my opinion, I would ask the ICG to rethink on the issue of co-chairs. I think we need only a Chairperson to fast-rack our work. It is always very challenging to row the boat smoothly when there are several captains. Moreover, ICG is not a permanent Group.
We should cut down on bureaucracies of selecting three co-chairs with all the attendant "balancing" that must be considered in the process.
Looking back at 17-18 July meeting, you will agree with me that it was smooth, focused and well steered.
I will urge us to select a capable chair who can always call for volunteer leads on theme(s) and other adhoc task(s}. ...
I think Mary has spoken very wise words here. It is a pity that we have been too far down a rat-hole to hear her when she said this during the meeting. Maybe we can take the chance to heed her advice now. I, for one, completely agree with her. I also believe Alissa did an outstanding job preparing and running the meeting. We should we look further? Daniel _______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
I hummed remotely for two co-chairs and still support that number. After reviewing the description, I think that having just one would be too much work for one person without a sufficient level of official support/back-up from the group. Having three would be inefficient and they would be tripping over themselves a bit as Mary mentions. Best, Jon On Jul 21, 2014, at 6:13 AM, Joseph Alhadeff <joseph.alhadeff@oracle.com> wrote:
I would ask members to use the time frames requested to both comment on numbers as well as on the description of thr role. I would also ask that if we go with one chair we have some form of backup if the one chair can not make a meeting.
Sent from my Android phone using TouchDown (www.nitrodesk.com)
-----Original Message-----
From: Daniel Karrenberg [daniel.karrenberg@ripe.net] Received: Monday, 21 Jul 2014, 12:08PM To: Mary Uduma [mnuduma@yahoo.com]; internal-cg@icann.org [internal-cg@icann.org] Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Co-chair roles document for comment
On 21.07.14 0:45 , Mary Uduma wrote:
... In my opinion, I would ask the ICG to rethink on the issue of co-chairs. I think we need only a Chairperson to fast-rack our work. It is always very challenging to row the boat smoothly when there are several captains. Moreover, ICG is not a permanent Group.
We should cut down on bureaucracies of selecting three co-chairs with all the attendant "balancing" that must be considered in the process.
Looking back at 17-18 July meeting, you will agree with me that it was smooth, focused and well steered.
I will urge us to select a capable chair who can always call for volunteer leads on theme(s) and other adhoc task(s}. ...
I think Mary has spoken very wise words here. It is a pity that we have been too far down a rat-hole to hear her when she said this during the meeting. Maybe we can take the chance to heed her advice now.
I, for one, completely agree with her.
I also believe Alissa did an outstanding job preparing and running the meeting. We should we look further?
Daniel _______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg _______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
Thanks Joe for your comprehensive description. As to the role I fully accept and don't see anything missing. Re the numbers of co-chairs I think 2 is good but necessary. Whether to call them co- or alternate chairs doesn't really matter as long as they share the workload. I was very much satisfied with Alissa navigating us through the London meeting, thank her for hwer willingness to serve as chair and join others having already expressed support for her. Best regards Wolf-Ulrich -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- From: Joseph Alhadeff Sent: Monday, July 21, 2014 12:13 PM To: mnuduma@yahoo.com ; internal-cg@icann.org ; daniel.karrenberg@ripe.net Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Co-chair roles document for comment I would ask members to use the time frames requested to both comment on numbers as well as on the description of thr role. I would also ask that if we go with one chair we have some form of backup if the one chair can not make a meeting. Sent from my Android phone using TouchDown (www.nitrodesk.com) -----Original Message----- From: Daniel Karrenberg [daniel.karrenberg@ripe.net] Received: Monday, 21 Jul 2014, 12:08PM To: Mary Uduma [mnuduma@yahoo.com]; internal-cg@icann.org [internal-cg@icann.org] Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Co-chair roles document for comment On 21.07.14 0:45 , Mary Uduma wrote:
... In my opinion, I would ask the ICG to rethink on the issue of co-chairs. I think we need only a Chairperson to fast-rack our work. It is always very challenging to row the boat smoothly when there are several captains. Moreover, ICG is not a permanent Group.
We should cut down on bureaucracies of selecting three co-chairs with all the attendant "balancing" that must be considered in the process.
Looking back at 17-18 July meeting, you will agree with me that it was smooth, focused and well steered.
I will urge us to select a capable chair who can always call for volunteer leads on theme(s) and other adhoc task(s}. ...
I think Mary has spoken very wise words here. It is a pity that we have been too far down a rat-hole to hear her when she said this during the meeting. Maybe we can take the chance to heed her advice now. I, for one, completely agree with her. I also believe Alissa did an outstanding job preparing and running the meeting. We should we look further? Daniel _______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg _______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
participants (3)
-
Jon Nevett -
Joseph Alhadeff -
WUKnoben