I think it is sufficient to record in the minutes that Wu has reviewed and approved as correct the language representing his statement in the minutes. On 11/25/2014 10:33 PM, Daniel Karrenberg wrote:
On 26.11.14 4:23 , Mary Uduma wrote:
Thank you Samantha for the prompt action.
It is seems No 1 action item needs re-couching, my understanding was that we have a level of comfort from the statements/briefing by Kuo Wu as the ICANN Board liaison to ICG.
Did we agree to demand a written undertaking from the ICANN Board in addition to Wu's statements? I do not think we agreed that. Wu is our liaison, he was there and heard what was said and summarised well by Alissa. I am sure Wu can see to it that his assurances are reinforced as necessary without this action point appearing in the minutes.
Daniel
_______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg