I have made some changes. In summary: I do not think secretariat should by themselves communicate or be contact points for the ICG. ICG members (and specifically the chair) are the contact points. We can not risk secretariat develop or otherwise communicate on behalf of the ICG. Unless EXPLICITLY so directed by the ICG. For example, as I have written, "manage the contact points for ICG" (not BE the contact point). In ICANN we have a few bad examples where the secretariat have believed they could summarise/propose, draw conclusions and communicate status of whatever group they are a secretariat for. That is not what I feel ICG want. Instead, secretariat should be administerial and then only work on explicit request by ICG. That might include communicate various by ICG developed messages (like press releases) though. Patrik On 1 aug 2014, at 04:57, Narelle Clark <narelle.clark@accan.org.au> wrote:
My thoughts attached.
Narelle
-----Original Message----- From: internal-cg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:internal-cg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Adiel Akplogan Sent: Sunday, 27 July 2014 12:58 AM To: ICG Internal Subject: [Internal-cg] ICG Secretariat
Dear all,
I have volunteered in London to takeover the issue on ICG Secretariat. Please see attached a document for input and comment where are try to define some criteria and framework for the secretariat function. I have suggested that we have the ToR published by the first week of August, so we will need to finalise this document by the end of next week (31/07/2014).
Thanks.
- a.
<ICG-Secretariat-v01-NCedit.docx>_______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg