Dear All, I continue to maintain my comments as already forwarded It is necessary to reflect the views / course of action referred to by Jari Regards Kavouss 2015-02-22 16:22 GMT+01:00 Manal Ismail <manal@tra.gov.eg>:
Agree .. That's why I was asking whether the ICG should bring to the attention of the CWG-Stewardship the way forward regarding the IANA trademark and domain name, as per the protocol parameters and the numbers proposals ..
Kind Regards --Manal
-----Original Message----- From: internal-cg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:internal-cg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Karrenberg Sent: Friday, February 20, 2015 2:28 PM To: joseph alhadeff; internal-cg@icann.org Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Step 2 assessment
On 18.02.15 16:23 , joseph alhadeff wrote:
Agree with the path forward, and would also suggest that we keep the Names community apprised of our progress on related work as things they may wish to consider in the development of their proposal.
Exactly!
Daniel
_______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg _______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg