I agree with Daniel's remark. As indicated in my previous email, the fact that the ICANN Board has delegated a Liaison to the ICG should suffice. Jean-Jacques. ----- Mail original ----- De: "Daniel Karrenberg" <daniel.karrenberg@ripe.net> À: "Mary Uduma" <mnuduma@yahoo.com>, "Samantha Dickinson" <samantha@linguasynaptica.com>, "ICG" <internal-cg@icann.org> Envoyé: Mercredi 26 Novembre 2014 04:33:31 Objet: Re: [Internal-cg] Action items from ICG call #8, 26 November 2014 On 26.11.14 4:23 , Mary Uduma wrote:
Thank you Samantha for the prompt action.
It is seems No 1 action item needs re-couching, my understanding was that we have a level of comfort from the statements/briefing by Kuo Wu as the ICANN Board liaison to ICG.
Did we agree to demand a written undertaking from the ICANN Board in addition to Wu's statements?
I do not think we agreed that. Wu is our liaison, he was there and heard what was said and summarised well by Alissa. I am sure Wu can see to it that his assurances are reinforced as necessary without this action point appearing in the minutes. Daniel _______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg