DearDaniel, Dear All, I think we have agreed that 1. Manal kindly prepare a Framework of the draft. 2. Share that draft with all ICG members 3. Finalize the draft on e-mail reflector 4. ICG agrees to the draft with consensus 5. Alissa send it out I think that this is a proper course of action to be followed.. This was agreed and we need to respect the agreement regardless of our individual views Regards Kavouss 2015-01-28 21:19 GMT+01:00 Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>:
That sounds perfect. Thanks Daniel.
jari
On 28 Jan 2015, at 14:08, Daniel Karrenberg <daniel.karrenberg@ripe.net> wrote:
Here is what I would write:
The ICG suggests that you take all comments made to the ICG about your
proposal or the process of creating it as if they were made inside your process and address them as you normally would. This may include discussing the response in your appropriate fora. In particular we suggest that you respond to the comments as you normally would, preferably in public.
If the ICG has specific questions to you based on the comments we will
explicitly ask them to you as part of our normal ICG process just like any other question we may have.
Daniel _______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
_______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg