Hi Patrik, Thank you for circulating the agenda for the face-to-face. I have a couple of comments. For the proposal assessment sessions, I think it would be good to specify which ones will be about protocol parameters and which ones will be about numbers. I think it’s important to dedicate time to each of them so we should clearly reserve time for both and not let one crowd out the other. And of course we all need to do our homework and read the assessments and ideally the proposals themselves before Friday. I think it would be helpful to designate a person who has done the assessment for each proposal to kick off the discussion about each. Perhaps Jari for protocol parameters and Paul for numbers? I think we should reserve time at the end of the agenda to discuss the future teleconference and face-to-face meeting schedule, as we normally do. Do we really need an hour to discuss coordination with the CCWG on accountability? Perhaps you or Mohamed could elaborate on what is planned to be included in this discussion. I think we should reserve some time (say 45 minutes) to wrap up the discussion about handling of community comments, and Manal should moderate that discussion. And as noted I think we need time on the agenda for the discussion of the updated timeline. Thanks, Alissa On Jan 28, 2015, at 2:32 AM, Patrik Fältström <paf@frobbit.se> wrote:
All,
First of all, I am happy to see assessments be added to the Dropbox in the folder Evaluation->Assessments->{Names,Numbers,Protocol Parameters}.
Keep up the good work (yes, I know, I am working on the Numbers as promised).
Secondly, I might not be able to participate on the call today due to speaking in the European Commission. It depends a bit on when my speaking slot actually ends up being. I might be able to participate on a portion of the call.
Let me because of that report here in writing:
- Move of website, mailing lists etc to new secretariat
This is under way, and you might see first things moved already end of this week.
Once again, a reminder that we will change domain name for the things we use. But we will also get new features, like a calendar(!).
- Our f2f meeting in Singapore
We will meet Friday and Saturday, and I suggest the following:
Friday
Welcome (Patrik) 9:00-09:30 - Agenda review - Outstanding minutes approval - Secretariat, logistics, teleconferences etc
Status coordination with ICANN Accountability CCWG (Mohamed) 09:30-10:30
Break 10:30-11:00
Process finalization process, questions that are filed etc (Everyone) 11:00-13:00
Lunch 13:00-14:00
Status for each one of the proposals (Everyone) 14:00-15:15
Break 15:15-15:45
Status for each one of the proposals, cont. (Everyone) 15:45-17:00
Group meeting(s) for people gathering in work sessions (food arrangements unclear) 17:00-21:00
Saturday
Status for each one of the proposals, cont. (Everyone) 09:00-10:30
Break 10:30-11:00
Status for each one of the proposals, cont. (Everyone) 11:00-12:30
Summary, path forward and decisions if afternoon session is needed (Everyone) 12:30-13:00
Lunch 13:00-14:00
Overflow: Status for each one of the proposals (Everyone) 14:00-15:15
Overflow: Break 15:15-15:45
Overflow: Status for each one of the proposals, cont. (Everyone) 15:45-17:00
_______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg