Hello All, The word Multi Stakeholder sounds great to me as it is a characterization of the group's composition. Can we consider the following? Multi-Stakeholder Coordinating Group on IANA Transition - MSCGIT or MCGIT Multi-Stakeholder Coordinating Group on IANA Stewardship - MSCGIS or MCGIS Mary Uduma On Monday, July 14, 2014 7:15 PM, Milton L Mueller <mueller@syr.edu> wrote: I think we're all getting way too cute with this. CG is fine. The list is already named that. Both TSIF and NXER refer to what we are supposed to facilitate but not to the group itself. Most everyone aware of us knows the context of the CG, so CG will do. Generally, I believe this is not something we should spend a lot more time on --MM
-----Original Message----- From: internal-cg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:internal-cg- bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Jari Arkko Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 8:23 AM To: Narelle Clark Cc: internal-cg@icann.org Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Naming the group was RE: scheduling meetings
Something witty and catchy would be good - NXFER anyone?
I agree. That is pretty good.
I also liked TSIF.
Jari
_______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg