Naming the group was RE: scheduling meetings
I've been calling it the NISTCG for want of a better term. Ie the NTIA IANA Stewardship Transition Co-ordination Group. Some of our community objected to it being the 'IANA transfer' group because in their mind they didn't think IANA needed to be transferred at all, but the NTIA. That would rule out Daniel's ICOB. Something witty and catchy would be good - NXFER anyone? Narelle -----Original Message----- From: internal-cg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:internal-cg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@t-online.de Sent: Sunday, 13 July 2014 9:04 PM To: Jari Arkko Cc: internal-cg@icann.org Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] scheduling meetings I also agree. BTW do we have an appropriate acronym for our group? "CG" seems too general. Maybe something with relation to IANA: ICG, CIG, CGI... Let's fix this asap to communicate to our respective groups. Wolf-Ulrich Sent from my personal phone
Am 13.07.2014 um 04:20 schrieb Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>:
For those of us with demanding jobs other than ICANN, it would be useful if we could combine CG meetings with other ICANN meetings to some extent. E.g., target L.A. ICANN meeting in October for our next F2F, add a day on to the beginning or end. IETF or RIR meetings might serve a similar function if we think we need to increase the frequency of F2F meetings (which I hope we don't!)
I agree with this as well. And IGF, which is coming up.
Jari
P.S. The IETF would be happy to see you all in some of our meetings, and you might even stay a few extra days, as we discuss IANA and other topics. You'd be warmly welcome in our Honolulu meeting (Nov 9-14) for instance :-) Or our upcoming Toronto meeting that starts a day after the coordination group meeting in London ends. Future meetings are at http://www.ietf.org/meeting/upcoming.html We also have an IETF policy guest program run by ISOC, a very popular program and something that you might consider if you have not been to an IETF meeting earlier.
IANA Stewardship Transition Co-ordination Group might be better Xiaodong Lee
I've been calling it the NISTCG for want of a better term. Ie the NTIA IANA Stewardship Transition Co-ordination Group.
Some of our community objected to it being the 'IANA transfer' group because in their mind they didn't think IANA needed to be transferred at all, but the NTIA.
That would rule out Daniel's ICOB.
Something witty and catchy would be good - NXFER anyone?
Narelle
-----Original Message----- From: internal-cg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:internal-cg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@t-online.de Sent: Sunday, 13 July 2014 9:04 PM To: Jari Arkko Cc: internal-cg@icann.org Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] scheduling meetings
I also agree.
BTW do we have an appropriate acronym for our group? "CG" seems too general. Maybe something with relation to IANA: ICG, CIG, CGI... Let's fix this asap to communicate to our respective groups.
Wolf-Ulrich
Sent from my personal phone
Am 13.07.2014 um 04:20 schrieb Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>:
For those of us with demanding jobs other than ICANN, it would be useful if we could combine CG meetings with other ICANN meetings to some extent. E.g., target L.A. ICANN meeting in October for our next F2F, add a day on to the beginning or end. IETF or RIR meetings might serve a similar function if we think we need to increase the frequency of F2F meetings (which I hope we don't!)
I agree with this as well. And IGF, which is coming up.
Jari
P.S. The IETF would be happy to see you all in some of our meetings, and you might even stay a few extra days, as we discuss IANA and other topics. You'd be warmly welcome in our Honolulu meeting (Nov 9-14) for instance :-) Or our upcoming Toronto meeting that starts a day after the coordination group meeting in London ends. Future meetings are at http://www.ietf.org/meeting/upcoming.html We also have an IETF policy guest program run by ISOC, a very popular program and something that you might consider if you have not been to an IETF meeting earlier.
_______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
I think we're all getting way too cute with this. CG is fine. The list is already named that. Both TSIF and NXER refer to what we are supposed to facilitate but not to the group itself. Most everyone aware of us knows the context of the CG, so CG will do. Generally, I believe this is not something we should spend a lot more time on --MM
-----Original Message----- From: internal-cg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:internal-cg- bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Jari Arkko Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 8:23 AM To: Narelle Clark Cc: internal-cg@icann.org Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Naming the group was RE: scheduling meetings
Something witty and catchy would be good - NXFER anyone?
I agree. That is pretty good.
I also liked TSIF.
Jari
Hello All, The word Multi Stakeholder sounds great to me as it is a characterization of the group's composition. Can we consider the following? Multi-Stakeholder Coordinating Group on IANA Transition - MSCGIT or MCGIT Multi-Stakeholder Coordinating Group on IANA Stewardship - MSCGIS or MCGIS Mary Uduma On Monday, July 14, 2014 7:15 PM, Milton L Mueller <mueller@syr.edu> wrote: I think we're all getting way too cute with this. CG is fine. The list is already named that. Both TSIF and NXER refer to what we are supposed to facilitate but not to the group itself. Most everyone aware of us knows the context of the CG, so CG will do. Generally, I believe this is not something we should spend a lot more time on --MM
-----Original Message----- From: internal-cg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:internal-cg- bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Jari Arkko Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 8:23 AM To: Narelle Clark Cc: internal-cg@icann.org Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Naming the group was RE: scheduling meetings
Something witty and catchy would be good - NXFER anyone?
I agree. That is pretty good.
I also liked TSIF.
Jari
_______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
Happy to have a new name that makes sense, but if it doesn’t happen very quickly in the next 2 days, I'm with Milton. Paul On 15 Jul 2014, at 4:14 am, Milton L Mueller <Mueller@syr.edu> wrote:
I think we're all getting way too cute with this. CG is fine. The list is already named that. Both TSIF and NXER refer to what we are supposed to facilitate but not to the group itself. Most everyone aware of us knows the context of the CG, so CG will do. Generally, I believe this is not something we should spend a lot more time on --MM
-----Original Message----- From: internal-cg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:internal-cg- bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Jari Arkko Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 8:23 AM To: Narelle Clark Cc: internal-cg@icann.org Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Naming the group was RE: scheduling meetings
Something witty and catchy would be good - NXFER anyone?
I agree. That is pretty good.
I also liked TSIF.
Jari
_______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
To be bluntly explicit: Me too. Either we agree in less than 5 minutes on something new or we remain with coordination group. Daniel Namen sind Schall und Rauch --- Sent from a handheld device.
On 16.07.2014, at 16:55, Paul Wilson <pwilson@apnic.net> wrote:
Happy to have a new name that makes sense, but if it doesn’t happen very quickly in the next 2 days, I'm with Milton.
Paul
On 15 Jul 2014, at 4:14 am, Milton L Mueller <Mueller@syr.edu> wrote:
I think we're all getting way too cute with this. CG is fine. The list is already named that. Both TSIF and NXER refer to what we are supposed to facilitate but not to the group itself. Most everyone aware of us knows the context of the CG, so CG will do. Generally, I believe this is not something we should spend a lot more time on --MM
-----Original Message----- From: internal-cg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:internal-cg- bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Jari Arkko Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 8:23 AM To: Narelle Clark Cc: internal-cg@icann.org Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Naming the group was RE: scheduling meetings
Something witty and catchy would be good - NXFER anyone?
I agree. That is pretty good.
I also liked TSIF.
Jari
_______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
_______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
+1. We need not to spend too much time on the name. Im fine with whichever name we use as much as it allows us to do the job. I will go with CG if there is no consensus on any of the other proposals. 5 mins of this at the beginning the 17? - a. ---------- Sent from an iPad
On Jul 16, 2014, at 20:23, Daniel Karrenberg <daniel.karrenberg@ripe.net> wrote:
To be bluntly explicit: Me too. Either we agree in less than 5 minutes on something new or we remain with coordination group.
Daniel
Namen sind Schall und Rauch
--- Sent from a handheld device.
On 16.07.2014, at 16:55, Paul Wilson <pwilson@apnic.net> wrote:
Happy to have a new name that makes sense, but if it doesn’t happen very quickly in the next 2 days, I'm with Milton.
Paul
On 15 Jul 2014, at 4:14 am, Milton L Mueller <Mueller@syr.edu> wrote:
I think we're all getting way too cute with this. CG is fine. The list is already named that. Both TSIF and NXER refer to what we are supposed to facilitate but not to the group itself. Most everyone aware of us knows the context of the CG, so CG will do. Generally, I believe this is not something we should spend a lot more time on --MM
-----Original Message----- From: internal-cg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:internal-cg- bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Jari Arkko Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 8:23 AM To: Narelle Clark Cc: internal-cg@icann.org Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Naming the group was RE: scheduling meetings
Something witty and catchy would be good - NXFER anyone?
I agree. That is pretty good.
I also liked TSIF.
Jari
_______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
_______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
if we want witty and pronounceable, but perhaps too trivial: MSGFI"X" - Multi Stakeholder Group Facilitating IANA Transition -- MSG however is also an acronym for a preservative added to foods that give some people headaches. I do like including the concept that were are not just meeting and making a decision, but facilitating the process by which the decision emerges/occurs. Are we really spending this many cycles on a name? Joe On 7/14/2014 1:48 AM, Narelle Clark wrote:
I've been calling it the NISTCG for want of a better term. Ie the NTIA IANA Stewardship Transition Co-ordination Group.
Some of our community objected to it being the 'IANA transfer' group because in their mind they didn't think IANA needed to be transferred at all, but the NTIA.
That would rule out Daniel's ICOB.
Something witty and catchy would be good - NXFER anyone?
Narelle
-----Original Message----- From: internal-cg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:internal-cg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@t-online.de Sent: Sunday, 13 July 2014 9:04 PM To: Jari Arkko Cc: internal-cg@icann.org Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] scheduling meetings
I also agree.
BTW do we have an appropriate acronym for our group? "CG" seems too general. Maybe something with relation to IANA: ICG, CIG, CGI... Let's fix this asap to communicate to our respective groups.
Wolf-Ulrich
Sent from my personal phone
Am 13.07.2014 um 04:20 schrieb Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>:
For those of us with demanding jobs other than ICANN, it would be useful if we could combine CG meetings with other ICANN meetings to some extent. E.g., target L.A. ICANN meeting in October for our next F2F, add a day on to the beginning or end. IETF or RIR meetings might serve a similar function if we think we need to increase the frequency of F2F meetings (which I hope we don't!) I agree with this as well. And IGF, which is coming up.
Jari
P.S. The IETF would be happy to see you all in some of our meetings, and you might even stay a few extra days, as we discuss IANA and other topics. You'd be warmly welcome in our Honolulu meeting (Nov 9-14) for instance :-) Or our upcoming Toronto meeting that starts a day after the coordination group meeting in London ends. Future meetings are at http://www.ietf.org/meeting/upcoming.html We also have an IETF policy guest program run by ISOC, a very popular program and something that you might consider if you have not been to an IETF meeting earlier.
_______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
participants (9)
-
Adiel Akplogan -
Daniel Karrenberg -
Jari Arkko -
joseph alhadeff -
Mary Uduma -
Milton L Mueller -
Narelle Clark -
Paul Wilson -
Xiaodong Lee