+1. We need not to spend too much time on the name. Im fine with whichever name we use as much as it allows us to do the job. I will go with CG if there is no consensus on any of the other proposals. 5 mins of this at the beginning the 17? - a. ---------- Sent from an iPad
On Jul 16, 2014, at 20:23, Daniel Karrenberg <daniel.karrenberg@ripe.net> wrote:
To be bluntly explicit: Me too. Either we agree in less than 5 minutes on something new or we remain with coordination group.
Daniel
Namen sind Schall und Rauch
--- Sent from a handheld device.
On 16.07.2014, at 16:55, Paul Wilson <pwilson@apnic.net> wrote:
Happy to have a new name that makes sense, but if it doesn’t happen very quickly in the next 2 days, I'm with Milton.
Paul
On 15 Jul 2014, at 4:14 am, Milton L Mueller <Mueller@syr.edu> wrote:
I think we're all getting way too cute with this. CG is fine. The list is already named that. Both TSIF and NXER refer to what we are supposed to facilitate but not to the group itself. Most everyone aware of us knows the context of the CG, so CG will do. Generally, I believe this is not something we should spend a lot more time on --MM
-----Original Message----- From: internal-cg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:internal-cg- bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Jari Arkko Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 8:23 AM To: Narelle Clark Cc: internal-cg@icann.org Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Naming the group was RE: scheduling meetings
Something witty and catchy would be good - NXFER anyone?
I agree. That is pretty good.
I also liked TSIF.
Jari
_______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
_______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg