Thanks Daniel for your clarification .. In fact I was also wondering whether this is intended as part of the process .. Glad you have explained .. Will share the current draft and await your and others' input .. Kind Regards --Manal -----Original Message----- From: internal-cg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:internal-cg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Karrenberg Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2015 11:49 AM To: Kavouss Arasteh; Jari Arkko Cc: IANA etc etc Coordination Group Subject: Re: [Internal-cg] Inpiut for Guidance to the Operational Communities Regarding Comments to the ICG On 28.01.15 21:52 , Kavouss Arasteh wrote:
DearDaniel, Dear All, I think we have agreed that 1. Manal kindly prepare a Framework of the draft. 2. Share that draft with all ICG members 3. Finalize the draft on e-mail reflector 4. ICG agrees to the draft with consensus 5. Alissa send it out I think that this is a proper course of action to be followed.. This was agreed and we need to respect the agreement regardless of our individual views Regards Kavouss
Kavouss, thank you for explaining your perception of what we agreed at the previous meeting. It is quite congruent with my perception as far as Manal's action item is concerned. However I was not speaking to Manal's action item, but rather to Alissa's action item regarding a response to questions from the numbers community. My intention is to provide helpful input to Alissa regarding the response based on my perception of the discussion at our last meeting. My recollection is that we agreed that the numbers community deserves a response before we have concluded the discussion Manal is leading and that we asked Alissa to send this response. I also plan to provide coherently worded input to Manal for her action item as soon as my current travel permits. Regards Daniel _______________________________________________ Internal-cg mailing list Internal-cg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg