hi all, i was reviewing this proposal today and realized that it would have been helpful when we were deciding to suspend the DSSA last December. as it was, we went ahead and suspended it on our own, without checking back with our respective ACs and SOs. having a more formal process would have given us the opportunity to bring broader attention to that decision. so i could either write a personal comment of support as co-chair of that working group, or i could write one for us and use that as an example. i'm not envisioning a really long comment, just an expression of support. thoughts? mikey Begin forwarded message:
From: "ICANN News Alert" <communications@icann.org> Subject: ICANN News Alert -- Proposed Modification of GNSO PDP Manual to Address the Suspension of a PDP Date: March 7, 2013 8:09:24 PM CST To: <mike@haven2.com>
News Alert
http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-07mar13-en.htm
Proposed Modification of GNSO PDP Manual to Address the Suspension of a PDP 7 March 2013
Forum Announcement: Comment Period Opens on Date: 7 March 2013 Categories/Tags: Policy Processes Reviews/Improvements Purpose (Brief): The Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO) Standing Committee on Improvements Implementation (SCI) is recommending a modification of the GNSO Policy Development Process (PDP) Manual, which is an integral part of the GNSO Operating Procedures, to address the possible termination or suspension of a PDP. Public Comment Box Link: http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/pdp-suspension-07mar13-en.htm
This message was sent to mike@haven2.com from: ICANN | 12025 Waterfront Drive Suite 300 | Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536 Email Marketing by
Manage Your Subscription
PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com, HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)