Consensus without a quorum? That is really uncommon common sense. I grew up knowing that if there is no quorum, there is no activity that is official coming from that non-quorate "meeting". Therefore, how can there be consensus if there wasn't a quorate meeting? A connsensus of 4? when quorum is double that? Besides, I didn't see a call for a VOTE, I saw an online POLL to confirm the consensus. (Similar as counting hands in a room, or having the members in f2f say AYE or NO. (Which brings us to acclamation) Maybe there's a problem with the translation because poll and vote are two very different things in English. Jacqueline A. Morris Technology should be like oxygen: Ubiquitous, Necessary, Invisible and Free. (after Chris Lehmann ) On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 5:53 AM, carlos dionisio aguirre <carlosaguirre62@hotmail.com> wrote:
Dear Jacqueline. The consensus was the silence. The no other candidate proposal. The lack of oposition. And as Jose said is really a stupid thing call to vote one candidate. My two cents. And common sense please. Enviado desde mi dispositivo inalámbrico BlackBerry®
-----Original Message----- From: Jacqueline Morris <jam@jacquelinemorris.com> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 07:35:12 To: <lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org> Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] LACRALO and Elections
Jose We have one candidate with approval from 4 of 36 ALSes, I don't see how 1/9th can be consensus. I'd think that if I were the candidate in this position, I'd like ALL the ALSes that support me to so say, and hence I am both officially and ethically approved. 4 out of 36 is kind of a big minority, not so? Just my $0.03.
Jacqueline A. Morris Technology should be like oxygen: Ubiquitous, Necessary, Invisible and Free. (after Chris Lehmann )