I strongly agree with Carlton, because our statement made in Paris was as Carlton said. Carlos Dionisio Aguirreabogado - Sarmiento 71 - 4to. 18 Cordoba - Argentina - *54-351-424-2123 / 423-5423 www.derechoytecnologia.com.ar http://ar.ageiadensi.org
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 19:16:54 -0500 From: carlton.samuels@uwimona.edu.jm To: admin@ttcsweb.org CC: lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] proposed GNSO group "CyberSafety Constituency" devoted to censorship?
Dev: We are firmly opposed to any involvement of ICANN in content regulation. This is why I strongly condemned the Morality and Public Order Objection in the gTLD process and involved myself in drafting the official ALAC response to it at Paris.
This is where I stand and shall remain.
Carlton Samuels
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 6:07 AM, Dev Anand Teelucksingh <admin@ttcsweb.org>wrote:
Via the IGP blog at http://blog.internetgovernance.org/blog/_archives/2009/3/17/4125801.html
is the mention that the proposed CyberSafety Constituency ( http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#cybersafety) is "an extension of the CP80 Foundation ( <http://www.cp80.org> http://www.cp80.org/). CP80 is devoted to systematic, global censorship of internet content in order to eradicate pornography."
In my opinion, ICANN should not be involved with content regulation. Thoughts?
Dev Anand Teelucksingh
_______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en_atlarge-lists...
_______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en_atlarge-lists...
_________________________________________________________________ ¿Querés cuidarte y estar bien? Conocé MSN Salud y Bienestar http://salud.latam.msn.com/