proposed GNSO group "CyberSafety Constituency" devoted to censorship?
Via the IGP blog at http://blog.internetgovernance.org/blog/_archives/2009/3/17/4125801.html is the mention that the proposed CyberSafety Constituency (http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#cybersafety) is "an extension of the CP80 Foundation ( <http://www.cp80.org>http://www.cp80.org/). CP80 is devoted to systematic, global censorship of internet content in order to eradicate pornography." In my opinion, ICANN should not be involved with content regulation. Thoughts? Dev Anand Teelucksingh
Dev, I fully agree with you and this is in compliance with the position taken when we discussed .xxx issue. Regards, Matías Altamira IIISI Rep. NomCom Rep. Matías Altamira Abogado ALTAMIRA GIGENA - Estudio Jurídico Bv. San Juan 101 Piso 2° "A" Córdoba - República Argentina Tel: +54 351 4281624 - 4257923 matias@altamiragigena.com.ar www.altamiragigena.com.ar -----Original Message----- From: lac-discuss-en-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:lac-discuss-en-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of Dev Anand Teelucksingh Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 8:07 AM To: lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: [lac-discuss-en] proposed GNSO group "CyberSafety Constituency"devoted to censorship? Via the IGP blog at http://blog.internetgovernance.org/blog/_archives/2009/3/17/4125801.html is the mention that the proposed CyberSafety Constituency (http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#cybersafety) is "an extension of the CP80 Foundation ( <http://www.cp80.org>http://www.cp80.org/). CP80 is devoted to systematic, global censorship of internet content in order to eradicate pornography." In my opinion, ICANN should not be involved with content regulation. Thoughts? Dev Anand Teelucksingh _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en_atlarge-lists .icann.org
I agree, ICANN insists that their mandate pertains specifically to ensuring the structural integrity of the internet space. I submit therefore that getting involved in content regulation is not part of that mandate. Lance Hinds DevNet Georgetown, Guyana -----Original Message----- From: lac-discuss-en-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:lac-discuss-en-bounces@atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of Dev Anand Teelucksingh Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 7:07 AM To: lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: [lac-discuss-en] proposed GNSO group "CyberSafety Constituency" devoted to censorship? Via the IGP blog at http://blog.internetgovernance.org/blog/_archives/2009/3/17/4125801.html is the mention that the proposed CyberSafety Constituency (http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#cybersafety) is "an extension of the CP80 Foundation ( <http://www.cp80.org>http://www.cp80.org/). CP80 is devoted to systematic, global censorship of internet content in order to eradicate pornography." In my opinion, ICANN should not be involved with content regulation. Thoughts? Dev Anand Teelucksingh _______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en_atlarge-lists .icann.org
Dev: We are firmly opposed to any involvement of ICANN in content regulation. This is why I strongly condemned the Morality and Public Order Objection in the gTLD process and involved myself in drafting the official ALAC response to it at Paris. This is where I stand and shall remain. Carlton Samuels On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 6:07 AM, Dev Anand Teelucksingh <admin@ttcsweb.org>wrote:
Via the IGP blog at http://blog.internetgovernance.org/blog/_archives/2009/3/17/4125801.html
is the mention that the proposed CyberSafety Constituency ( http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#cybersafety) is "an extension of the CP80 Foundation ( <http://www.cp80.org> http://www.cp80.org/). CP80 is devoted to systematic, global censorship of internet content in order to eradicate pornography."
In my opinion, ICANN should not be involved with content regulation. Thoughts?
Dev Anand Teelucksingh
_______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en_atlarge-lists...
I strongly agree with Carlton, because our statement made in Paris was as Carlton said. Carlos Dionisio Aguirreabogado - Sarmiento 71 - 4to. 18 Cordoba - Argentina - *54-351-424-2123 / 423-5423 www.derechoytecnologia.com.ar http://ar.ageiadensi.org
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 19:16:54 -0500 From: carlton.samuels@uwimona.edu.jm To: admin@ttcsweb.org CC: lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org Subject: Re: [lac-discuss-en] proposed GNSO group "CyberSafety Constituency" devoted to censorship?
Dev: We are firmly opposed to any involvement of ICANN in content regulation. This is why I strongly condemned the Morality and Public Order Objection in the gTLD process and involved myself in drafting the official ALAC response to it at Paris.
This is where I stand and shall remain.
Carlton Samuels
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 6:07 AM, Dev Anand Teelucksingh <admin@ttcsweb.org>wrote:
Via the IGP blog at http://blog.internetgovernance.org/blog/_archives/2009/3/17/4125801.html
is the mention that the proposed CyberSafety Constituency ( http://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/#cybersafety) is "an extension of the CP80 Foundation ( <http://www.cp80.org> http://www.cp80.org/). CP80 is devoted to systematic, global censorship of internet content in order to eradicate pornography."
In my opinion, ICANN should not be involved with content regulation. Thoughts?
Dev Anand Teelucksingh
_______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en_atlarge-lists...
_______________________________________________ lac-discuss-en mailing list lac-discuss-en@atlarge-lists.icann.org http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/lac-discuss-en_atlarge-lists...
_________________________________________________________________ ¿Querés cuidarte y estar bien? Conocé MSN Salud y Bienestar http://salud.latam.msn.com/
participants (5)
-
carlos aguirre -
Carlton Samuels -
Dev Anand Teelucksingh -
Lance Hinds -
Matías Altamira