Bill, For in-script variants IP asked we provide evidence of the variant relationship. Since the cases you are proposing do not fall in the homoglyph category, the panel must provide a strong reason for inclusion (e.g. Marshelle cases) Thanks, Dennis From: Latingp <latingp-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Bill Jouris <bill.jouris@insidethestack.com> Reply-To: Bill Jouris <bill.jouris@insidethestack.com> Date: Wednesday, August 22, 2018 at 11:54 PM To: "latingp@icann.org" <latingp@icann.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Latingp] Draft in-script variants I've taken the liberty of adding a couple dozen additional candidates. (I held off the Rating 2 cases. These are the slam dunks.) I still think that, as discussed last week, we ought to include more cases rather than fewer. Especially when we are sending a draft to the IP for review -- that's when they can tell us if we have taken a wrong turn. Bill Jouris Inside Products bill.jouris@insidethestack.com 831-659-8360 925-855-9512 (direct) ________________________________ From: "Tan Tanaka, Dennis via Latingp" <latingp@icann.org> To: "latingp@icann.org" <latingp@icann.org> Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2018 7:43 PM Subject: [Latingp] Draft in-script variants Dear Latin GP, Here is the compilation of current in-script variant candidates for our review during tomorrow’s call. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bKKFHxbjgBd9CIPRiuOsej_3x670yTytUMM32Ou7... Talk to you all soon. Best, -Dennis _______________________________________________ Latingp mailing list Latingp@icann.org<mailto:Latingp@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/latingp